What's new

Three more Pantsirs were destroyed by Turkish drones in Libya within 24h

Well, radar on this one starts working just one second before explosion. Not active again basically.



All Pantsirs that were hit not active. The only one that is active in first seconds and its not hit.

Ok buddy, whatever makes you feel happy. :tup:
 
.
Ok buddy, whatever makes you feel happy. :tup:

Whats your problem, dude? Two pantsirs hit on these videos, radars not working on them(starts working 1 sec before explosion on one). Just stating facts. You managed to track them before they became active. Good for you.
 
.
Whats your problem, dude? Two pantsirs hit on these videos, radars not working on them(starts working 1 sec before explosion on one). Just stating facts. You managed to track them before they became active. Good for you.


What you are trying to prove ? You mean Pantsir was actually super systems but Turks always catch them non-active so they became a sitting duck against tactical drones ?

 
.
Battles are determined by who wins, not by who losses what. Half a million American soldiers fell in WW2 yet America won the war.
 
.
Battles are determined by who wins, not by who losses what. Half a million American soldiers fell in WW2 yet America won the war.

png-rage-comic-internet-meme-anger-crying-meme-love-white-child-face-clipart.png
 
.
What you are trying to prove ? You mean Pantsir was actually super systems but Turks always catch them non-active so they became a sitting duck against tactical drones ?


Yea, genius. Thats best strategy to destroy Pantsir trying to locate and catch them while they are not active or on the move. And what are you trying to prove? Yet, Pantsir can be destroyed even in active mode, its not any kind of invicible system.
 
. .
Pissst, we are gonna win the war, too...

We shall see.

Yea, genius. Thats best strategy to destroy Pantsir trying to locate and catch them while they are not active or on the move. And what are you trying to prove? Yet, Pantsir can be destroyed even in active mode, its not any kind of invicible system.

Pantsir has pretty good kill ratio against TB2 in Libya. Hence GNA failed to take Sirte even with Turkish army support.
 
. .
Yea, genius. Thats best strategy to destroy Pantsir trying to locate and catch them while they are not active or on the move. And what are you trying to prove? Yet, Pantsir can be destroyed even in active mode, its not any kind of invicible system.


so what you are crying for ? Members post the videos of new destroyed Pantsirs and appreciate the success of Turkish drones against your SAMs.The number of Russian SAMs destroyed in both Libya and Syria approached to 20 units and You can see all active and non-active destruction of your missile systems in footages revealed by Turkish sources. Before maoning about it, At least try to find a better excuse for your face-saving posts.
 
.
so what you are crying for ? Members post the videos of new destroyed Pantsirs and appreciate the success of Turkish drones against your SAMs.The number of Russian SAMs destroyed in both Libya and Syria approached to 20 units and You can see all active and non-active destruction of your missile systems in footages revealed by Turkish sources. Before maoning about it, At least try to find a better excuse for your face-saving posts.

No crying, just laughable to read here your non-stopping bragging with fantasy numbers about some super-duper invicible Turkish drones that fly around and destroy all air defenses then in reality there were getting shot down in dozens and in most cases only hit inactive Pantsirs and unprotected hangars.
 
.
No crying, just laughable to read here your non-stopping bragging with fantasy numbers about some super-duper invicible Turkish drones that fly around and destroy all air defenses then in reality there were getting shot down in dozens and in most cases only hit inactive Pantsirs and unprotected hangars.

In Turkish drones are so invincible why don't they flight Russia? :disagree:
 
.
No crying, just laughable to read here your non-stopping bragging with fantasy numbers about some super-duper invicible Turkish drones that fly around and destroy all air defenses then in reality there were getting shot down in dozens and in most cases only hit inactive Pantsirs and unprotected hangars.

I am not talking about fantasy. It is you who is generating non-stop stories without backing what you are talking. All I share is the official informations supported with footages. On the other hand, You are talking with imaginary numbers and excuses without showing any single visual proofs from Syria. At first, when the first Pantsir footage was revealed, You called them as video game, fake but now, at least, You accept that Pantsirs were destroyed but you are just generating different kind of excuses as “they were not active, They were under the shelters, unprotected hangars”. That is a positive advance for me. At the end of the day, You will come close to the point we are talking.

A dozen of Russian air defence system have been destroyed by a group of tactical drones having 55kg payload. Rest is about your fantasy and excuses.
 
.
I am not talking about fantasy. It is you who is generating non-stop stories without backing what you are talking. All I share is the official informations supported with footages. On the other hand, You are talking with imaginary numbers and excuses without showing any single visual proofs from Syria. At first, when the first Pantsir footage was revealed, You called them as video game, fake but now, at least, You accept that Pantsirs were destroyed but you are just generating different kind of excuses as “they were not active, They were under the shelters, unprotected hangars”. That is a positive advance for me. At the end of the day, You will come close to the point we are talking.

A dozen of Russian air defence system have being destroyed by a group of tactical drones having 55kg payload. Rest is about your fantasy and excuses.

Pantsir is a kind of CIWS, not a medium AD.
 
. .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom