This photo says so much about China's view of the South China Sea ruling

[ito]

Similar to India in Sikkim?? Or West Bengal? Or Balochistan conspiracy?
India should comply with the real history -- -- -- --divided into 100 pieces.

If you look at India's historic maps, India stretched from Afghanistan to Laos. That does mean that India start claiming all areas from Afghanistan to Laos? Talks sense.

 

[yolo2016]

Similar to India in Sikkim?? Or West Bengal? Or Balochistan conspiracy?
India should comply with the real history -- -- -- --divided into 100 pieces.


Don't need to ask CCP, I can directly ask Mr Obama's younger brother, Mr Mark. After all, he has been living in China for 12 years. Enough love China.

You need to ask someone to figure out the difference between a rock, man made islands and actual vibrant, and populated island?

 

[beijingwalker]

The world then was governed by few nations, divide by treaties and war . Where is China @ the time of Colonization era , still and the cave?

Its too late for China for become a colonizer , even rocks on the sees you cannot have it in this modern world.

We don't want to be a colonizer and those islands or rocks are ours and we firmly have them, what are you going to do about this fact?

 

[Mangus Ortus Novem]

The multipolar order has emerged faster than it was expected. Even in Asia one can see the mulitpolar order taking shape. On side Chinese leadership, SCO, OBOR and on the other the alliance of japan-india with US and Asutralia doing whatever its asked to by the US.

SCS and ECS are Chinese for a long time. No discussion necessary.

BRICS died a quite death thanks to coupe in Brazil and indian alliance with the US.

 

[yolo2016]

And what would you like to say about Diego Garcia, as far as I know their locals were thrown out of the island forcefully so that it can be handed over to US, or would you like to deny that too in a favor of your beloved Country?

Actual inhabited islands since 1790s and part of grandfathered territories vs rocks and man made islands. It was the British that relocated the population. Relocation that your benefactor China forces at many instances in their own country and you don't seem to object. Frankly, if you support this ancient map theory then India has 100% rights over Paksitani land and waters around it. Trying to be more chinese than chinese as usual?

 

[Beidou2020]

If you look at India's historic maps, India stretched from Afghanistan to Laos. That does mean that India start claiming all areas from Afghanistan to Laos? Talks sense.

LOL there was no such thing called 'India' until the British conquered dozens of small kingdoms and put them together and made it into a 'country' and called it 'India'

'India' is not a country. It's a geographical expression.

Pakistan was considered part of this 'India' by the British early on. But they got broke away, and many others will eventually break away too.

Sikhs and Tamils are completely different people that should have their own countries (which I believe they will as I predict India to Balkanise sometime in the 21st century) just like Pakistan broke away. There are many other countries that should get their own independence from the Union of 'India'.

India is an artificially created Union. Without the Brits, the land you refer to as 'India' would be made up of dozens of small countries.

 

[SBUS-CXK]

If you look at India's historic maps, India stretched from Afghanistan to Laos. That does mean that India start claiming all areas from Afghanistan to Laos? Talks sense.

If you know the China' Tang dynasty army with Arab -- -- -- -- Battle of Talas. You should know that the whole is also China's central Asia and Afghanistan. Does this on behalf of the Chinese to claim the entire central Asian sovereign??

If you know that in 1368 China's Ming dynasty military conquest of the Mongol empire, conquer the Lake Baikal region, on behalf of the Chinese to claim sovereignty Mongolia?

So, India to Sikkim, west Bengal, baluchistan, south Tibetan sovereignty claims that all is illegal.
Divided into 100 pieces.

The world then was governed by few nations, divide by treaties and war . Where is China @ the time of Colonization era , still and the cave?

Its too late for China for become a colonizer , even rocks on the sees you cannot have it in this modern world.

Oh, Afghanistan belongs to the modern world? Baby, I think so -- -- -- -- -- -- -- if China is the cave, so all the economic and per capita GDP is lower than China....(Including Afghanistan) Landfill, shit, hell.

This is Afghanistan's understanding of the world?

 

[.]

By the same logic, Moon belongs to US

Hey doesn't matter all matters is who got their first and to who it belongs now : @
Just like Indian Kashmir

 

[ito]

LOL there was no such thing called 'India' until the British conquered dozens of small kingdoms and put them together and made it into a 'country' and called it 'India'

'India' is not a country. It's a geographical expression.

Pakistan was considered part of this 'India' by the British early on. But they got broke away, and many others will eventually break away too.

Sikhs and Tamils are completely different people that should have their own countries (which I believe they will as I predict India to Balkanise sometime in the 21st century) just like Pakistan broke away. There are many other countries that should get their own independence from the Union of 'India'.

India is an artificially created Union. Without the Brits, the land you refer to as 'India' would be made up of dozens of small countries.

Now don't explain India to an Indian.

 

[kankan326]

Communist China propaganda failed miserably , they feed their people with raw propaganda and backfired pretty bad .look what happened to their *9 dash line.

The 9 dash line(11 dash line back then) was made by KMT, who was sworn enemy of CCP.

 

[cnleio]

This photo says so much about China's view of the South China Sea ruling

• Amanda Macias

• 17h

While Manila triumphed over Beijing in a historic legal decision last week, the fight in the South China Sea is far from over.

On July 12, the Permanent Court of Arbitration issued a 500-page unanimous ruling in Republic of Philippines v. People's Republic of China, and found that Beijing had violated the Philippines' economic and sovereign rights.

The court concluded there was no legal basis for China's nine-dash line territorial claim, which encompasses approximately 85% of the South China Sea.

However, within a day of the ruling, China landed a civilian aircraft on Mischief Reef — a tiny bit of land in the Spratly Islands that was found to belong entirely to the Philippines.

Chinese state-run media published photos of the China Southern Airlines crew posing in front a plane after the landing.

Crew members holding a Chinese national flag pose in front of a plane at a new airport China built on Mischief Reef in the South China Sea. Reuters

"That timing [of the flight] was clearly a signal of discontent of the ruling, but this was going to happen sooner rather than later," Gregory Poling, director of Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told Business Insider.

"Of course, in light of the ruling, this is rubbing salt in the Philippines' wound," Poling added.

"The court ruled China's initial occupation of Mischief Reef and its construction of facilities there illegal," Poling said, "so every day that China continues to make use of those facilities it is violating international law."

http://uk.businessinsider.com/photo-china-southern-airlines-mischief-reef-2016-7?yptr=yahoo

I add three photos here to tell us, what next China will put on islands in SCS ...(sorry not good photo)

 

[simple Brain]

It was the British that relocated the population.

I do not see anywhere where it says that the British relocated the genuine inhabitants of the Diego Garcia Island. But the matter of fact is that they forcefully kicked them out of the Island. Read this one out and open your eyes a bit, there is also a world a bigger world outside of US.
https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2012/feb/15/diego-garcia-few-man-fridays
And do not miss this one.
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_truth_about_the_us_military_base_at_diego_garcia_20150615

Relocation that your benefactor China forces at many instances in their own country and you don't seem to object.

lol what are you a 4 year old kid? do you even understand the meaning of relocation? That's China's own Population and their relocation is not like they did to the Red Indians back in 1800's. Read this one out.
https://www.loc.gov/teachers/classr...esentations/immigration/native_american2.html
China relocate their People for the sake of their own benefits, Chinese Government built hundreds of state-of-the-art cities to accommodate their citizens, these cities have everything that one needs in a modern city. How could you even compare a forced relocation of the inhabitants to an economically beneficial relocation?

Frankly, if you support this ancient map theory then India has 100% rights over Paksitani land and waters around it.

what are you trying to say in here? You dont make any sense mate, just tell me that you are not an active employee of CNN or CNBC or Fox news? Are you?

Trying to be more chinese than chinese as usual?

Well to be honest with ya, I love China, you like or not, but People of Pakistan admire China because of thousands of reasons, and I do not expect you to understand being an American.

 

[AndrewJin]

I do not see anywhere where it says that the British relocated the genuine inhabitants of the Diego Garcia Island. But the matter of fact is that they forcefully kicked them out of the Island. Read this one out and open your eyes a bit, there is also a world a bigger world outside of US.
https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2012/feb/15/diego-garcia-few-man-fridays
And do not miss this one.
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_truth_about_the_us_military_base_at_diego_garcia_20150615



lol what are you a 4 year old kid? do you even understand the meaning of relocation? That's China's own Population and their relocation is not like they did to the Red Indians back in 1800's. Read this one out.
https://www.loc.gov/teachers/classr...esentations/immigration/native_american2.html
China relocate their People for the sake of their own benefits, Chinese Government built hundreds of state-of-the-art cities to accommodate their citizens, these cities have everything that one needs in a modern city. How could you even compare a forced relocation of the inhabitants to an economically beneficial relocation?



what are you trying to say in here? You dont make any sense mate, just tell me that you are not an active employee of CNN or CNBC or Fox news? Are you?



Well to be honest with ya, I love China, you like or not, but People of Pakistan admire China because of thousands of reasons, and I do not expect you to understand being an American.

I think he is maybe a CCP agent hired to deliberately make stupid comments to make USA look stupid.

 

[yolo2016]

I do not see anywhere where it says that the British relocated the genuine inhabitants of the Diego Garcia Island. But the matter of fact is that they forcefully kicked them out of the Island. Read this one out and open your eyes a bit, there is also a world a bigger world outside of US.
https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2012/feb/15/diego-garcia-few-man-fridays
And do not miss this one.
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_truth_about_the_us_military_base_at_diego_garcia_20150615



lol what are you a 4 year old kid? do you even understand the meaning of relocation? That's China's own Population and their relocation is not like they did to the Red Indians back in 1800's. Read this one out.
https://www.loc.gov/teachers/classr...esentations/immigration/native_american2.html
China relocate their People for the sake of their own benefits, Chinese Government built hundreds of state-of-the-art cities to accommodate their citizens, these cities have everything that one needs in a modern city. How could you even compare a forced relocation of the inhabitants to an economically beneficial relocation?



what are you trying to say in here? You don't make any sense mate, just tell me that you are not an active employee of CNN or CNBC or Fox news? Are you?



Well to be honest with ya, I love China, you like or not, but People of Pakistan admire China because of thousands of reasons, and I do not expect you to understand being an American.

1.If you don't know the history, I'd suggest you read up on it. The French sold it to British in 1790s. Who relocated people almost 100 years later, not Americans
2. In your zeal to act more chinese than the chinese and perpetually kiss their___ - you forgot that chinese relocated Tibetans, who are not Chinese Hans.
3. Btw, the term Red indians, dear uneducated Pakistani, is a racist term, similar to calling you a **** is . call them "Native Americans".
4. Ancient map theory, which you support as China's claim as a basis of 9 dash line; if applied to Pakistan, would place Pakistan under Indian territory. Actually balochistan would not be yours too, after you annexed them. I'm not sure if that is too cerebral for you comprehend bro.

 

[Mangus Ortus Novem]

I now know why Afghanistan is one of the world's most failed state. Because of the low IQ.

That poster is an indian. But the rest of your statement is still valid.