This Is What Supercontinent Pangea Looks Like Mapped With Modern Borders

[LeGenD]

All those pictures you posted show taxonomic features which lead us to one species: Homo Sapiens Sapiens. We have certain features which classify us as one species.

Variation in skeletons of modern humans are not limited to skulls, FYI. These variations can be significant and have multiple causes that include life-style and environment.

Check following links:

Skeletal Series Part 1: Bone Variation & Biomechanics | These Bones Of Mine

VARIATIONS IN THE HUMAN SKELETON AND THEIR CAUSES - BRINTON - 2009 - American Anthropologist - Wiley Online Library

http://www.icr.org/i/pdf/imp/imp-323.pdf

http://smithsonianscience.si.edu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/homo_neanderthalensis.jpg

This is gold:

In this science of late years we hear and read a great deal of “ retrogressive anomalies,” of “ atavistic traits,” of ‘‘ pithecoid,” and “ simian ” and “ lemurian reversions.’’ Any unusual structural variation is at once claimed as the inexplicable apparition of some ancestral type, the ghost of some grandfather a thousand times removed, but ever inopportunely popping up in the present. (Brinton, D.)

Homo erectus

Conjecture, my friend.

Homo australopithecus (in the middle)

You might have heard about and/or seen pygmy modern humans and also those with short faces.

Homo rudolfensis

etc etc

This is a "reconstructed" skull. It may not be accurate.

Now you dont need to study human anatomy to understand that those are not from the same species (Why did no one on this planet point out that these might all be humans if your claim was true anyways?)

The structure of the skeleton, body weight, brain volume, height etc etc... non of these aspects point towards a modern human. You might as well take a chimpanzee skeleton and claim it might be a human.

Evolutionists look at the bones, notice 'some' differences, and bang; we have a new species. They need to focus on the diversity among modern humans and think really hard.

Modern humans already noticeably vary in outer appearance, skeletal features, DNA make-up, size/stature and strength.

And no, Chimpanzee skeleton looks nothing like that of a modern human. Have a look: https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/49/b1/a1/49b1a1f5af5d00f71f8a1451fd38f076.jpg

 

[Zibago]

All those pictures you posted show taxonomic features which lead us to one species: Homo Sapiens Sapiens. We have certain features which classify us as one species.

Homo erectus

Homo australopithecus (in the middle)

Homo rudolfensis

etc etc


Now you dont need to study human anatomy to understand that those are not from the same species (Why did no one on this planet point out that these might all be humans if your claim was true anyways?)

The structure of the skeleton, body weight, brain volume, height etc etc... non of these aspects point towards a modern human. You might as well take a chimpanzee skeleton and claim it might be a human.




Pakistan has indeed a very diverse geological landscape since the collision of the Indian plate with Eurasia folded up and "mixed through" several different layers of sediments

India`s one is less diverse but much older in comparison (More than billions of years in large areas!)

Homo erectus is an actual species

 

[Koovie]

Variation in skeletons of modern humans are not limited to skulls, FYI. These variations can be significant and have multiple causes that include life-style and environment.

Check following links:

Skeletal Series Part 1: Bone Variation & Biomechanics | These Bones Of Mine

VARIATIONS IN THE HUMAN SKELETON AND THEIR CAUSES - BRINTON - 2009 - American Anthropologist - Wiley Online Library

http://www.icr.org/i/pdf/imp/imp-323.pdf

http://smithsonianscience.si.edu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/homo_neanderthalensis.jpg

This is gold:

In this science of late years we hear and read a great deal of “ retrogressive anomalies,” of “ atavistic traits,” of ‘‘ pithecoid,” and “ simian ” and “ lemurian reversions.’’ Any unusual structural variation is at once claimed as the inexplicable apparition of some ancestral type, the ghost of some grandfather a thousand times removed, but ever inopportunely popping up in the present. (Brinton, D.)


Conjecture, my friend.


You might have heard about and/or seen pygmy modern humans and also those with short faces.


This is a "reconstructed" skull. It may not be accurate.


Evolutionists look at the bones, notice 'some' differences, and bang; we have a new species. They need to focus on the diversity among modern humans and think really hard.

Modern humans already noticeably vary in outer appearance, skeletal features, DNA make-up, size/stature and strength.

And no, Chimpanzee skeleton looks nothing like that of a modern human. Have a look: https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/49/b1/a1/49b1a1f5af5d00f71f8a1451fd38f076.jpg

Again, there are certain taxonomic features which point toward a specific species.
Thats the issue which you are frantically denying... or ignoring



And the fossils found are 100% NOT human. Infact there is no paleontologist, physician etc on Earth who seriously doubts that those fossils are not human.

Simply because they arent build in the same way as ours.

All your examples are simply variations within the human skeleton structure, but still point towards ONE species.



You can clearly see here that these arent human skeletons (the ones on the right)

 

[XenoEnsi-14]

I think you are talking about Rodinia, which was the first supercontinent in the pre Cambrian era (=Older than 500 MY ago)
Rodinia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Actually that would Pannotia not Rodinia, Rodinia existed about a billion years ago, Pannotia about 600 million years ago.

 

[Koovie]

Actually that would Pannotia not Rodinia, Rodinia existed about a billion years ago, Pannotia about 600 million years ago.

Yes, my bad

 

[Asian.Century]

Interesting some Pakistan is neighbour of Yemen, Oman and Saudia on one hand and other is with India, tibet etc.

 

[truthfollower]

Pakistan was under water for quite sometime