This is what India fear the most about

[Anish1]

Aww rubber glue syndrome.

Start saying i am a Hindu and i am not a terrorist.

Just like Khan did.

You should make a sign board and glue to your head so next time your national bird Flys over your head you will still have it standing between your two shoulders

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

I have also looked at the latest rainfall data, and Tibet receives very little rainfall.

It is the source of major rivers simply because it is the highest land mass of Asia. Rivers flow from height to sea, so they would all naturally originate in the heighest land feature that is Tibetan Plateau.

Also, as I say, originating point of the river is not the only source of a river. Take a look at Brahmaputra. It starts as a small river in Tibet, but assumes MASSIVE form in Assam because that is where all the rain occurs. If let's say you were to totally divert Brahmaputra above Arunachal Pradesh, it would have no difference for Brahmaputra in Assam, since most of its water in Assam, is due to rain that happens in Assam.

Your assessment is wrong, if China divert water from Brahmaputra river, not only India will get nothing from China and but if China divert excessively the water it will be come a reversed flown which mean China will get water from India and drastically lower the level of water of Brahmaputra and you can kiss good bye of your North East. Your people need this water to survive more than us but if this water can bring back the reforestation of Xinjiang...then it's worth for China to carry on.

The reason China still doing nothing about Tibet water is because China hope to have India as friend and not to piss it off and make India obsessed over the water issue, but when become enemy China will not be polite with India when come to national interest.

 

[Bussard Ramjet]

If that's the case then India and Bangladesh would not be alarmed, a lot of the water is from melting glaciers not rainfall. Tibet is the largest water source on earth after North and South pole bro.

Due to global warming, India is having a drought now, please read the links I posted. If you can't see this threat, I have nothing to say. Who controls Tibet controls the future and Indian strategist knows this. That's why they are protesting like crazy over Chinese dam building.

Umm.. Tibet's water source and third pole theory is advanced by Tibetan separatists in India, to gain attention.

They also advance the theory that Giant Panda is indigenous to Tibet.

By exaggerating the importance of Tibet, they want India and the world to side with them. And Indian right wingers totally take it all up.

You seem to be taking it up as well to feel superior.

As I have shown again and again, Tibet receives very little rain fall. The water there is gathered over many hundreds of years. And that water isn't enough to sustain life. Raw precipitation is what is needed.

Your assessment is wrong, if China divert water from Brahmaputra river, not only India will get nothing from China and but if China divert excessively the water it will be come a reversed flown which mean China will get water from India and drastically lower the level of water of Brahmaputra and you can kiss good bye of your North East. Your people need this water to survive more than us but if this water can bring back the reforestation of Xinjiang...then it's worth for China to carry on.

The reason China still doing nothing about Tibet water is because China hope to have India as friend and not to piss it off and make India obsessed over the water issue, but when become enemy China will not be polite with India when come to national interest.

You don't seem to understand geography, terrain, precipitation patterns etc.

You can take the water of Brahmaputra that is in your side of the border and do as you please with it.

However, you can't touch water that actually falls on our side of the border. It is simply because water doesn't flow back up.

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

High IQ chinese meet going on how to turn India into a desert.

Very interesting.

Indian's monsoon is directly relate to Tibet geographical condition, if China decide to alter the condition of Tibet, India will be a disaster, we don't even need to fire a single shot.


http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/sc...eau-and-the-indian-monsoon/article4651084.ece

 

[Han Patriot]

Umm.. Tibet's water source and third pole theory is advanced by Tibetan separatists in India, to gain attention.

They also advance the theory that Giant Panda is indigenous to Tibet.

By exaggerating the importance of Tibet, they want India and the world to side with them. And Indian right wingers totally take it all up.

You seem to be taking it up as well to feel superior.

As I have shown again and again, Tibet receives very little rain fall. The water there is gathered over many hundreds of years. And that water isn't enough to sustain life. Raw precipitation is what is needed.

Fine, it's propaganda from Tibetan separatist, but hydrological data in China suggests the potential for dams it's huge, with no water, can you explain to me how are they gonna build that many dams? I guess they are under Tibetan separatist propaganda too? That think tank analysing the war strategy is a government think tank, I guess he is under Tibetan propaganda too? I guess it's dry desert too. Take a look at the plateau and count the amount of lakes there.

 

[Guynextdoor2]

That is mean.
Well we plan to stop their oil as part of unsc embargo.
You can match the timing.

OH YOU DO!!! THE SAME UNSC WHERE 4 out of 5 MEMBERS CALL YOU TERRORIST PROMOTER ETC>? Wonder how you will get support of britain/france/us/russia.

You call this an internationally recognized source? Even if it is true, it only says you got so much material, nothing else. and how about your so-called H-bomb? you don't call a 50 kilo ton (the maximum yield you ever achieved) bomb a H-bomb ? Do you?

a 50 KT in Beijing will be enough to return any pain we face. No Indian city is as concentrated as a chinese city. You probably shouldn't be talking about Atomic bombs.

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

You don't seem to understand geography, terrain, precipitation patterns etc.

You can take the water of Brahmaputra that is in your side of the border and do as you please with it.

However, you can't touch water that actually falls on our side of the border. It is simply because water doesn't flow back up.

Sure I do, just do a simulation and you will see what I mean, if we divert more water than we deliver to India, Water from India side will flow into Chinese territory unless you decide to put barrage at you did with Bangladesh or divert water as well.

 

[Bussard Ramjet]

Fine, it's propaganda from Tibetan separatist, but hydrological data in China suggests the potential for dams it's huge, with no water, can you explain to me how are they gonna build that many dams? I guess they are under Tibetan separatist propaganda too? That think tank analysing the war strategy is a government think tank, I guess he is under Tibetan propaganda too? I guess it's dry desert too. Take a look at the plateau and count the amount of lakes there.

Potential for dams is different than water that it carries.

For a dam, the biggest requirement is you need water that quickly descends, in a narrow space.

You can't have a dam in plains, because the water isn't descending fast enough, and if the dam were to be built large amounts of land would submerge.

So, rivers in Tibet and mountains in general carry water (very fresh and pure water), and carry it while descending quickly, and in narrow spaces that can be damned, hence ideal.

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

https://www.thethirdpole.net/2016/10/02/chinese-dam-hurts-tibet-more-than-india/

The doklam standoff has nothing much to do with water. Its more to do with its proximity to India's silguri corridor.

I have never said that this is relate to Donglan affaire

 

[Bussard Ramjet]

Sure I do, just do a simulation and you will see what I mean, if we divert more water than we deliver to India, Water from India side will flow into Chinese territory unless you decide to put barrage at you did with Bangladesh or divert water as well.

But you can't divert more water than you deliver to India. Once you have diverted all the water that you have, the river will simply dry up.

Indian lands in Arunachal and Assam are downstream to the river, meaning the water won't flow back up the river.

Indian's monsoon is directly relate to Tibet geographical condition, if China decide to alter the condition of Tibet, India will be a disaster, we don't even need to fire a single shot.


http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/sc...eau-and-the-indian-monsoon/article4651084.ece

Yeah, but you can't do that again.

Indian monsoons are due to Himalayas and their height. To alter Indian monsoons you will have to blow away a mountain range that is 4000 km in length and 500 km in width, and upto 9000 km in height. AND, most of that range is in India and Nepal.

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

But you can't divert more water than you deliver to India. Once you have diverted all the water that you have, the river will simply dry up.

Indian lands in Arunachal and Assam are downstream to the river, meaning the water won't flow back up the river.

Why not, if we deliver 1 million meter cube of water to India, now if we decide to divert 1.5 millions m^3 of water to Xinjiang...you will expect the reverse flow of the river...LMAO

 

[Han Patriot]

Sure I do, just do a simulation and you will see what I mean, if we divert more water than we deliver to India, Water from India side will flow into Chinese territory unless you decide to put barrage at you did with Bangladesh or divert water as well.

Tibet has water, the problem is it is running off into India, China already did an experiment with Zangmu, they diverted some water and started agriculture in one area. By damming up Tibet, moisture retains in Tibet.

 

[ohmrlobalobayeh]

Sunny Jim you think-- Stopping Water will Only Impact India...

We will stop Buying your products --- are your 60 Bn profit will go in smoke...as it is You are facing Debit Issues.

By the Way -- China blocks Indias WATER WILL Impact Bangladesh, Burma -- your Dear fiends...

Also, we have Capability to Break your Dams...We wouldnt keep Quiet --

Haha thats betraying ur fear n helplessness.

You are using bangladesh as a shield

I repeat:

China has india by the balls.

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

Tibet has water, the problem is it is running off into India, China already did an experiment with Zangmu, they diverted some water and started agriculture in one area. By damming up Tibet, moisture retains in Tibet.

I think China policy maker will not polite with India as before and generously let water run free to India...

 

[Bussard Ramjet]

Tibet has water, the problem is it is running off into India, China already did an experiment with Zangmu, they diverted some water and started agriculture in one area. By damming up Tibet, moisture retains in Tibet.

But that is what I am telling you.

Rivers don't carry water from Point A, to the sea.

Rivers originate in Point A, but then through out their journey they carry water and grow bigger, finally into Sea.

Similarly, when Brahmaputra enters India, it is a small river.

It receives most of its water due to heavy rainfall in Assam, and North East India in general.

So if you cut Brahmaputra at top, it won't make much difference to brahmaputra in Assam.