What's new

'This could destroy China': parliament sets Xi Jinping up to rule for life

This decision now also sets the precedent for future dictators to rule for life in China.
What precedents is Trump setting, I wonder?
So you are expecting China to collapse in 2018? Or 2019? Please give a date. I think I've heard this claim every single year for the past 29 years.:coffee:
These Coming Collapse of China people are like a millenarian cult. Hopefully they'll all drink the poisoned Kool-Aid soon.
 
.
President Xi appears to be very capable, I dont understand why Western propagandists are getting so upset?
 
.
Even though that I'm not in favor of more than two terms President but saying this could destroy China is just a pure drama, China has survived and prevailed for over 5 millennium mean that we Chinese know how to adapt to the situation and geo-politic environment but I do hope that during Xi presidency that he can improve to make China a competitive governing system.

By competitive governing system I mean every single of governing department shall be competitive and outperform other nation's counterpart and be productive to serve Chinese people interest regardless of ideology such communism, Socialism, Capitalism or democratism, bottom line Chinese system must be the best of best in order to prevail in this world.
 
.
Western anus burning :lol:

Western anus is burning on a whole host of things LOL Each day is a celebratory day.

Orange man has been one terrible omen for the Western world since he took office. Just as predicted.

President Xi appears to be very capable, I dont understand why Western propagandists are getting so upset?

Anywhere the Western world is unable to impose its sham "democracy" it deems a threat and alien. By sham democracy I mean the kind which is run by poodles who follow every dictation set by the West. That is the whole ordeal for being upset.

The West is too afraid for its own good. The West will always need an enemy to remain united. Remember that heads were being chopped in the Western world not so long ago. China or Russia wasn't chopping these heads.

As long as China's able to maintain steady economic growth and expansion it will be politically stable, if the day ever comes that this changes, I'm sure China can adapt as they see fit.

Meanwhile the US has got an petulant orangutan in the oval office, Britain has voted for its own misery through Brexit and Europe is seeing an insurgent far right. The Chinese can be forgiven for looking at the West's criticism of their internal politics and spotting some very apparent irony.

Well said. The problem is that the West doesn't want an economically and politically stable China.

What precedents is Trump setting, I wonder?

These Coming Collapse of China people are like a millenarian cult. Hopefully they'll all drink the poisoned Kool-Aid soon.

These are the same Western nations that were predicting the non-existence of Pakistan not so long ago.

One can only smile at these doomsday predictions for China.
 
. . . . . . .
Its Chinese internal affairs. I wonder why the "West" cares so much about Xi Jinping becoming the new emperor of China if we go by this rule of life thing?

If Xi Jinping is a good leader, then China should have him obviously.

Only an idiot would think otherwise.
 
.
So you are expecting China to collapse in 2018? Or 2019? Please give a date. I think I've heard this claim every single year for the past 29 years.:coffee:

Amerikkka has a reality TV star in the oval office and the next administration might be Oprah Winfrey :cheers:

I wanna see Jerry Springer or Hulk Hogan.

No, I said nothing of a Chinese collapse. This is just another self inflicted wound that will lead to the internal rot of the CCP over a number of years. It's no different than what has happened in countless other dictatorships.

This decision has my full support. I want to congratulate China on their new lifelong dictator!
 
.
The pattern couldn't be more evident. If one digs out the past articles from the West relating to China's economic crash, hard landing, housing bubble, ghost cities, HK's doomsday after its return to Mainland, HK democracy no more, tiananmen square incident (massacre according to the West), Tibet and Xinjiang suppression and many more one can see how they always seem "concerned" with China's economic and political well being with those "beneign" advice.
The West and India enjoy sticking their noses into matters that doesn't concern them, very odd behavior if you ask me. You don't see Chinese people meddling with their political system, no criticism, no advice. But every single time they got it all wrong. Now why is that? :lol:

Aren't there more urgent matters to deal with when UK is struggling to deal with Post Brexit situation for the British? Shouldn't European journalists be more concerned when Trump is announcing trade war with Europe? Shouldn't slumdogs focus more on the dire economic situation India has been facing for decades?

It's an internal affair for China and its citizens, how our leaders are elected and how the constitutions will be adjusted are nobody's business. It's not your country, you are not of the Chinese race so why do idiots like those slumdogs think they have the right to tell China what to do? :rofl:

No, I said nothing of a Chinese collapse. This is just another self inflicted wound that will lead to the internal rot of the CCP over a number of years. It's no different than what has happened in countless other dictatorships.

This decision has my full support. I want to congratulate China on their new lifelong dictator!

Self inflicting wound? in what way? what do you predict will happen then if you don't mean anything about economic collapse.
 
.
No, I said nothing of a Chinese collapse. This is just another self inflicted wound that will lead to the internal rot of the CCP over a number of years. It's no different than what has happened in countless other dictatorships.

This decision has my full support. I want to congratulate China on their new lifelong dictator!

You westerner prediction is always wrong about China, extension of presidential term is not equal dictatorship but it's true if it happens to American President because you guys are so predictable :lol:.
 
.
The Chinese leader, Xi Jinping, has succeeded in abolishing presidential term limits, a momentous political coup that paves the way for him to stay in power for years to come.

Nearly 3,000 members of China’s National People’s Congress voted the highly controversial constitutional amendment through during a Sunday afternoon session at the Great Hall of the People – an imposing Mao-era theatre on the western fringe of Tiananmen Square.

Applause rippled through the auditorium as Xi cast his vote, using two hands to place a salmon-coloured ballot into a bright red box at 3.24pm. A further 2,957 ballots were cast in favour of the change while three delegates abstained and two voted against, a small hint of the outrage the move has caused in some liberal circles.

The identifies of the five dissenters is - and will almost certainly remain - a mystery.

“I can now announce that the proposals to amend the constitution of the People’s Republic of China has passed,” an announcer proclaimed, sparking a 20-second burst of applause.

Two other amendments designed to shore up Xi’s supremacy were also approved through the same vote: the addition of a political philosophy called Xi Jinping Thought to the constitution, and the creation of politically driven “supervisory commissions” tasked with investigating party members and civil servants.

The parliament’s chairman, Zhang Dejiang, told delegates it was time to get behind Xi’s push to make China great again.

“The great dream of national rejuvenation encourages us to keep striving; the great era inspires us to forge ahead,” Zhang said.

“Let us hold high the banner of socialism with Chinese characteristics, thoroughly study and apply Xi Jinping Thought ... and realise the Chinese Dream.”

Yuan Weixia, a delegate from Hubei province, said she was excited to be part of such a pivotal moment in Chinese history and had no hesitation in backing her leader.

“Xi has shown us the right direction in development and if you have found the right path why change?” she said before placing her ballot into one of 28 boxes in the Great Hall. “We need a strong leadership which can keep leading us forwards.”

“It’s what we need to keep advancing in the right direction,” agreed Mayisifu, a delegate from the Hui minority from Qinghai province.

For Xi, who is now widely considered China’s most dominant leader since Mao Zedong, Sunday’s vote represents a landmark victory in his battle for complete command of the world’s number two economy.

Opponents, however, call the decision to scrap the two-term limit – introduced in 1982 to prevent a repeat of the horrors of the Mao era – a calamity that risks plunging China into a new age of political turbulence and one-man dictatorship.

“This could destroy China and the Chinese people. So I cannot stay silent. I have to let them know that there are people against it, and to do so publicly,” protested Li Datong, a retired newspaper editor who became the face of liberal opposition to Xi’s power grab when he published a combative open letter attacking the move.

Li said he felt livid that with Sunday’s vote “more than 2,000 deputies were acting like puppets and leading us back to the Mao era”. “What about holding referendum? Dare they hold a referendum? Of course they don’t,” he said. “I’m sorry, when I think about this, I can’t stop getting angry, and saying bad words.”

The political commentator Cary Huang called Xi’s attempt to become China’s “de facto monarch” possibly the most controversial political development of modern Chinese history.

“History has shown that many political leaders who sought lifelong service have not managed to realise their vision,” Huang warned in Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post. “Some have been deposed … others have been assassinated by political enemies”.

“The stakes could not be any higher; renewed hostility among political rivals and the repression of political dissent puts China at risk of repeating the tragedies of the Mao era,” Huang added.

Elizabeth Economy, the author of a forthcoming book about Xi called The Third Revolution, said Xi’s bid to grab “all the levers of power” reflected his conviction that only he could put China back at the centre of global affairs.

“The greatest risk for him is that he makes himself a lightning rod. So if the Chinese economy slows significantly, or if there is some major disaster or problem, then he has basically assumed responsibility for whatever happens in the country,” said Economy, the director for Asia studies at the Council on Foreign Relations.

Economy said that with his relentless anti-corruption campaign and purges, Xi had created “some pretty significant pockets of discontent among powerful players”.

According to one recent count, since taking power in 2012 Xi has used an anti-corruption campaign to bring down a succession of heavyweight rivals including more than 100 generals and admirals and six top party figures who were accused of plotting a coup.

“If somehow there is a weakness to be found, I think that his enemies will circle and go in for the kill. That’s the greatest danger to him at this point,” Economy said.

For world leaders Economy said she could see at least one potential upside to Xi’s longevity which would allow them to predict more clearly “the opportunities and threats they would face when dealing with China”.

“There is no mystery as to the direction in which he wants to take the country.”

For those who opposed Xi and his crackdown on human rights and dissent it boded ill, she said. “I think it’s very bleak, the outlook politically.”

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...arliament-sets-xi-jinping-up-to-rule-for-life

A massive self inflicted wound for China, and a coup for the United States. Thank you China...

I am a bit disappointed with that decision but United States should worry more about its lifetime terms for its own senators. US have more 70 and 80 olds zombies still in power than China.

Quote
As of March 11, 2018, 5 senators are in their 80s, 18 are in their 70s

I sometimes also wish Mahathir had continue serving as prime minister of Malaysia and not step down.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile...alaysia-mahathir-mohamad-najib-razak.amp.html
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom