They threatened to kill us if we didn’t leave India: Rohingya

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

Then offer to take them into Pakistan instead of hypocritically demanding India to take in refugees.
You can't laugh at Indian poverty while demanding India to divert resources to refugees
You can't shout at every single instance of Islamophobia in India and acting like India is hell for Muslims and then attack India for not taking in refugees. You don't shout at hell for not taking in people

Your country was founded on secularism, so it shouldn’t matter the religion of refugees, right?

Pakistan is not going to take any unwanted refugees from India, BD, or Burma. We are trying to reduce our population now.

This is conspiracy of Pakistan supporting Kashmiris , they want rohangias to settle in jammu just to reduce Hindu population.

It’s the wish of Kashmiris to help their brothers. Pakistan does not have any influence over Rohingya. Stop peddling your Hindutva nonsense theories.

 

[Godman]

Your country was founded on secularism, so it shouldn’t matter the religion of refugees, right?

Pakistan is not going to take any unwanted refugees from India, BD, or Burma. We are trying to reduce our population now

We don't take refugees regardless of their religion. We can't maintain them
All the Rohingyas that came to SL have been handed over to the UNHCR and were settled in countries willing to take them

 

[Khanate]

Then offer to take them into Pakistan instead of hypocritically demanding India to take in refugees.
You can't laugh at Indian poverty while demanding India to divert resources to refugees
You can't shout at every single instance of Islamophobia in India and acting like India is hell for Muslims and then attack India for not taking in refugees. You don't shout at hell for not taking in people

Over 400,000 Rohingyas live in Pakistan so no hypocrisy here. Moreover, countries around the world, including Pakistan, have taken in refugees while fighting poverty. The hypocrisy is India claiming to be secular while only accepting non-Muslim refugees.

READ: The new citizenship bill and the Hinduisation of India

 

[Godman]

Over 400,000 Rohingyas live in Pakistan so no hypocrisy here. Moreover, countries around the world, including Pakistan, have taken in refugees while fighting poverty. The hypocrisy is India claiming to be secular while only accepting non-Muslim refugees.

READ: The new citizenship bill and the Hinduisation of India

There is at least a thread about poverty in India or Islamophobia in PDF everyone time I come here. Why should you force Rohingyas to go to such a place? There is hypocrisy there. If India is so bad why force India to take in Rohingyas. If you are not a hypocrite then you hate Rohingyas so much you want them to go to a place you consider hell for Muslims
India has to use its resources for its citizens and its interests NOT run a charity.
India can take in anyone they want and refuse anyone they want. If Rohingyas are not compatible with Indian culture or the arrival of refugees pose a threat to security and the safety of its citizens India has the right to refuse them.
If you want Rohingyas so much then take every single one into Pakistan without being a hypocrite

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

There is at least a thread about poverty in India or Islamophobia in PDF everyone time I come here. Why should you force Rohingyas to go to such a place? There is hypocrisy there. If India is so bad why force India to take in Rohingyas. If you are not a hypocrite then you hate Rohingyas so much you want them to go to a place you consider hell for Muslims
India has to use its resources for its citizens and its interests NOT run a charity.
India can take in anyone they want and refuse anyone they want. If Rohingyas are not compatible with Indian culture or the arrival of refugees pose a threat to security and the safety of its citizens India has the right to refuse them.
If you want Rohingyas so much then take every single one into Pakistan without being a hypocrite

Kashmir is not India. You don’t have a right to prevent Kashmiris from welcoming Rohingya refugees into their ancestral homes.

 

[Godman]

Kashmir is not India. You don’t have a right to prevent Kashmiris from welcoming Rohingya refugees into their ancestral homes

I certainly don't have a right to stop anyone from entering India and neither does you to force people into entering India illegally. The closest thing to "Ancestral Lands" the Rohingya have in are in BD. Making up fairy tales isn't going to force a country to take in illegal migrants. Rohingyas don't magically fly or teleport to Kashmir and the Indian govt can stop anyone entering their borders illegally.

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

I certainly don't have a right to stop anyone from entering India and neither does you to force people into entering India illegally. The closest thing to "Ancestral Lands" the Rohingya have in are in BD. Making up fairy tales isn't going to force a country to take in illegal migrants. Rohingyas don't magically fly or teleport to Kashmir and the Indian govt can stop anyone entering their borders illegally.

So why is the Indian government trying to attract minorities in Pakistan and Bangladesh?

Obviously religion matters a lot to the BJP, it’s their whole worldview.

Rohingya don’t bother Indian and are no threat to India, but India views all Muslims as a threat.

It hasn’t changed a bit since ‘47.

 

[Godman]

So why is the Indian government trying to attract minorities in Pakistan and Bangladesh?

Obviously religion matters a lot to the BJP, it’s their whole worldview.

Rohingya don’t bother Indian and are no threat to India, but India views all Muslims as a threat.

It hasn’t changed a bit since ‘47.

There are enough Muslims in India and just because there are islamophobes doesn't mean India views all Muslims are a threat.

It is beneficial for India to take in minorities from Pak and BD becuase its good for PR, easier to integrate and their numbers are low enough to manage unlike the Rohingya who keep flooding and taking in more will only encourage even more to flood creating a situation similar to the EU immigrant crisis.

And again India can choose who enters and who doesn't. Its their choice

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

There are enough Muslims in India and just because there are islamophobes doesn't mean India views all Muslims are a threat.

It is beneficial for India to take in minorities from Pak and BD becuase its good for PR, easier to integrate and their numbers are low enough to manage unlike the Rohingya who keep flooding and taking in more will only encourage even more to flood creating a situation similar to the EU immigrant crisis.

And again India can choose who enters and who doesn't. Its their choice

If India can't handle handle Rohingya refugees as it claims, why not help Bangladesh nip the problem in the bud by forcing Burma to take responsibility and end their suffering.

Don't you think Indian BJP support for the Burmese slaughter is counter intuitive with such a large Muslim minority and Bangladeshi, Rohingya immigrants in your country?

 

[Godman]

If India can't handle handle Rohingya refugees as it claims, why not help Bangladesh nip the problem in the bud by forcing Burma to take responsibility and end their suffering.

Don't you think Indian BJP support for the Burmese slaughter is counter intuitive with such a large Muslim minority and Bangladeshi, Rohingya immigrants in your country?

What is India supposed to do? India can't end the Rakhine conflict. It is a bomb that would have exploded eventually

 

[Soumitra]

If India can't handle handle Rohingya refugees as it claims, why not help Bangladesh nip the problem in the bud by forcing Burma to take responsibility and end their suffering.

how is it our problem what happens to them in BD or Burma? We are not the thekedar of Islam

 

[Khanate]

There is at least a thread about poverty in India or Islamophobia in PDF everyone time I come here. Why should you force Rohingyas to go to such a place? There is hypocrisy there. If India is so bad why force India to take in Rohingyas. If you are not a hypocrite then you hate Rohingyas so much you want them to go to a place you consider hell for Muslims

If you haven't noticed, Rohingyas themselves picked West Bengal perhaps based out of kinship or because Hindu nationalist BJP isn't in power there. Either way, Rohingyas aren't following my suggestions in this thread.

Your point on alleged hypocrisy has already been addressed i.e. Pakistan hosts 400,000 Rohingyas while India hosts about 18,000. Moreover, India proclaims to be secular so there is hypocrisy involved here but not in the way you think. Going by your worldview, millions of Indians shouldn't live and work in Muslim-majority nations like Pakistan and UAE. Yet, they do.

• There are more Indian migrants living in Pakistan than the United States (Quartz)

India has to use its resources for its citizens and its interests NOT run a charity.

Clueless.

UNHCR pays to host the refugees.

https://www.unhcr.org/protection/operations/50001ec69/india-fact-sheet.html

India can take in anyone they want and refuse anyone they want.

India has signed international conventions hence international law applies here as such there are norms to be followed.

• UNHCR seeking clarification from India over returns of Rohingya (Jan 2019)

If Rohingyas are not compatible with Indian culture

What is the compatibility criteria?

or the arrival of refugees pose a threat to security and the safety of its citizens India has the right to refuse them.

Of course, national security exemptions apply.

If you want Rohingyas so much then take every single one into Pakistan without being a hypocrite

Sharing is caring.

 

[Godman]

If you haven't noticed, Rohingyas themselves picked West Bengal perhaps based out of kinship or because Hindu nationalist BJP isn't in power there. Either way, Rohingyas aren't following my suggestions in this thread.

Your point on alleged hypocrisy has already been addressed i.e. Pakistan hosts 400,000 Rohingyas while India hosts about 18,000. Moreover, India proclaims to be secular so there is hypocrisy involved here but not in the way you think. Going by your worldview, millions of Indians shouldn't live and work in Muslim-majority nations like Pakistan and UAE. Yet, they do.

• There are more Indian migrants living in Pakistan than the United States (Quartz)

Clueless.

UNHCR pays to host the refugees.

https://www.unhcr.org/protection/operations/50001ec69/india-fact-sheet.html





India has signed international conventions hence international law applies here as such there are norms to be followed.

• UNHCR seeking clarification from India over returns of Rohingya (Jan 2019)

What is the compatibility criteria?





Of course, national security exemptions apply.





Sharing is caring.

How is Indians working in Muslim countries related to refugees? India allows Muslims to work there. There are many Arabs working in India. If you are talking about refugees talk about REFUGEES not migrant workers. Going by your world view you.... Oh wait you don't even know the difference between migrant workers and refugees
Putting dumb memes isn't going to cover up for putting unrelated and non-existent issues


You are showing your hypocrisy by forcing countries to take refugees specially the one you make fun of. I don't care how retarted Pakistan is to take in more after the Afghan refugees. If Pakistanis weren't that suicidal Pakistan would have been a developed country that had long surpassed India. You can't be suicidal and call the sane nations hypocrites


Hypocrisy is where you bash India for its poverty and islamophobes but force them to take in refugees who also happen to be Muslim. Rohingyas are heavily radicalised and pose a security threat to India and Indian citizens.

 

[Nilgiri]

Eloquently put @Godman

 

[Khanate]

How is Indians working in Muslim countries related to refugees? India allows Muslims to work there. There are many Arabs working in India. If you are talking about refugees talk about REFUGEES not migrant workers. Going by your world view you.... Oh wait you don't even know the difference between migrant workers and refugees
Putting dumb memes isn't going to cover up for putting unrelated and non-existent issues


You are showing your hypocrisy by forcing countries to take refugees specially the one you make fun of. I don't care how retarted Pakistan is to take in more after the Afghan refugees. If Pakistanis weren't that suicidal Pakistan would have been a developed country that had long surpassed India. You can't be suicidal and call the sane nations hypocrites


Hypocrisy is where you bash India for its poverty and islamophobes but force them to take in refugees who also happen to be Muslim. Rohingyas are heavily radicalised and pose a security threat to India and Indian citizens.

Since you enjoy my memes, this sums up your argument.

I simply applied your worldview i.e. if Rohingyas are not compatible with Indian culture to Indians themselves. If you don't like your own worldview then I encourage you to get a new one.

Eloquently put @Godman

400% in agreement with you.