What's new

'They are Northeastern people not Bangladeshis', says Karnataka Home Minister

You can cry like a river but fact is a fact. Foreign ministry of Bangladesh protested such hereasy and propaganda of 3.2 million Bangladeshi living in India that is why it was not included in 2017 report. Why do you think the largest block of migrant in the world disappeared in report? Lol. I am quoting a former Foreign Ministry Secretary who said it in a talk saw India entered the data and we had to protest to remove it from later reports.

Bangladeshi representive was not present when earlier report was prepared based on false data supplied by Hindu extremist of India. To date no one knows how many Bangladeshi lives in India or vice versa. In 2004 one Indian minister claimed 12 million Bangladeshis lives in India later denounced it say it was based on hereasy and unreliable data. If your minister can say something like that at the parliament and later denounce it, there is no credibility what India says about the issue.

It is not even mentioned yet how the initial figure of 3.2 million was published and what is the source of it. No doubt some Hindus migrated to India and any such figure contain mostly Hindus.

Didn't even read you BS post. Did you even check out the UN-DESA site ?

No proofs, no data, no links

Total BS, so typical Bangladeshi...:rofl:

Bangladeshi representive was not present when earlier report was prepared based on false data supplied by Hindu extremist of India.

A big LOL
 
.
Didn't even read you BS post.

No proofs, no data, no links

Total BS, so typical Bangladeshi...:rofl:


I already provided 2017 link which thrown out garbage data supplied by India.

What happened to you biggest block of migrant in the world? UN by mistake did not include that. Lol :rofl:

You can laugh and cry on the floor whole night but fact remain facts there was no credibility of the data and not yet mentioned what was the source of it based on which India supplied it?

However UN also included the following thing as well.

The definition of international migrants used in the report is broad and takes into account anyone living in a country different from their own and includes refugees and economic migrants, both those immigrating officially and those who do so "irregularly," said Bela Hovy, the chief of the Migration Section of the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs(UNDESA).
 
.
Look, friends both Indian and BD, no one aware of the geography will ever doubt that infiltration took place. If we dwell into the reasons thereof, the prime among them will be the Chit Mahals, better known as Enclaves, or parcels of areas that changed hands according to the result of board games that we call pasha in Bangla.

I have been to the enclaves many a times on official duty as have our friends from BD. Each time I returned home thinking about the fate of the people who couldn't call themselves Indian or Bangladeshi in the real sense. Partition was a cruel joke, people on both sides were not prepared for it least of all those living in those artificial habitats. They had nowhere to go, Indian lands for instance had to pass through BD areas and vice versa. I have heard of a BD Chit Mahal that is enclosed by an Indian one, only that the entire structure is deep inside Bangladesh. Figure that!

Those Bangladeshis and even some of us Indians always tomtom about their GDP growth and what not, I am not good with figures but what I understand is that these figures are of no use if the benefits don't trickle down to the most downtrodden segment of the society. The enclave dwellers certainly didn't receive much of the benefit since our independence.
 
.
I already provided 2017 link which thrown out garbage data supplied by India.

What happened to you biggest block of migrant in the world? UN by mistake did not include that. Lol :rofl:

You can laugh and cry on the floor whole night but fact remain facts there was no credibility of the data and not yet mentioned what was the source of it based on which India supplied it?

More fantasies by conspiracy theorists...Thrown out what ? :lol: Tell me what this is...Migrants by origin & destination.

http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/data/estimates2/estimates17.shtml

The definition of international migrants used in the report is broad and takes into account anyone living in a country different from their own and includes refugees and economic migrants, both those immigrating officially and those who do so "irregularly,"

We don't offer work visas to BD, do we ?
 
.
.
By 3.2 million which was originally said in 2013 did not mean all are illegal migrants rather there were many refugees
More fantasies by conspiracy theorists...Thrown out what ? :lol: Tell me what this is...Migrants by origin & destination.

http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/data/estimates2/estimates17.shtml



We don't offer work visas to BD, do we ?


There are many students studying in India, many Hindus went there and seek refugee claim, many Hindus are economic migrant as well, there are Bangladeshi business man and working professionals as well. Many Bangladeshis has relatives in India and staying in India for extended period with tourist visa. If they count all these and came up with the figure that is one thing which indicated reduced by .8 million since 2000. But still the question remains if it counted illegal migration how they counted them. Unless any illegal migrant asked for some kind of document or detained there are no way to count them.
 
.
By 3.2 million which was originally said in 2013 did not mean all are illegal migrants rather there were many refugees



There are many students studying in India, many Hindus went there and seek refugee claim, many Hindus are economic migrant as well, there are Bangladeshi business man and working professionals as well. Many Bangladeshis has relatives in India and staying in India for extended period with tourist visa. If they count all these and came up with the figure that is one thing which indicated reduced by .8 million since 2000. But still the question remains if it counted illegal migration how they counted them. Unless any illegal migrant asked for some kind of document or detained there are no way to count them.

The number of students/legal immigrants wouldn't make 3.1 million. Bangladeshis must draw a salary of over 16 lakh P.A to be granted employment Visa here (9 lakh if married to an Indian/PIO)

No, India is not a party to 1951 refugee convention and do not accept them as refugees. Instead they are illegal immigrants for us.

However according to UNHCR there are 200,000 refugees (by their definitions) in India from several regions including Sri Lanka & Tibet.

https://m.timesofindia.com/world/re...mber-of-refugees/amp_articleshow/47773635.cms
 
Last edited:
. . . . .
Now that 3.1 million even count legal migrants.

And how many legal Bangladeshis are in India in the first place, given that you need to earn over Rs 16 lakh for an employment Visa ?
 
Last edited:
. . .
Will you stop talking stupid and insane? What is the relationship between an election result and rectifying a false assumption? It is BD which is suffering because the unemployed Indians regularly pole vault to BD, get employment and remit $4.5 billion to their families in the rich India. Do we regularly complain about this? But, the little Indians complain when even tens from BD are not found in their hungry Europe. It is because the Indians are bigots.

No one cares about your claims inside your little swamp (because honestly no one really goes there and you are full of lies from the get go about some genocide hoax and GDP extraction hoax for your very political founding...that you then had to get on your knees to Dada for).....I only judge on what you lot do outside your swamp today (given no more BBS fakery present there)....it speaks volumes:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...ing-dhaka-dubai-turkey-detained-a7713911.html

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/sate...row-for-launching.550790/page-4#post-10369670

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/land-acquired-for-indian-economic-zones.550354/page-6#post-10366772
 
.
Back
Top Bottom