What's new

The U.S. ‘Obviously’ Doesn’t Want to Contain China, Mattis Says

haidian

BANNED
Joined
Dec 18, 2010
Messages
4,888
Reaction score
1
Country
China
Location
China
The U.S. ‘Obviously’ Doesn’t Want to Contain China, Mattis Says

Bloomberg News
BloombergOctober 16, 2018

6a7d5be20ebe7a5b6929c8777baa2c87

The U.S. ‘Obviously’ Doesn’t Want to Contain China, Mattis Says

(Bloomberg) -- Secretary of Defense James Mattis played down tensions with Beijing, saying the U.S. was “not out to contain China” and was cooperating whenever possible, but that there would be times they would “step on each other’s toes.”

“Obviously, we’re not out to contain China. We’d have taken an altogether different stance had that been considered. It has not been considered,” he told reporters Monday on a plane en route to Vietnam.

“We seek a relationship with China that’s grounded in fairness, reciprocity and respect for sovereignty,” he said.

He said Washington is cooperating with China on issues including North Korea and the United Nations.

“So we’re two large powers, or two Pacific powers, two economic powers. There’s going to be times we step on each other’s toes, so we’re going to have to find a way to productively manage our relationship,” he said.

Mattis spoke on his way to attend defense ministers’ meetings hosted by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations in Singapore, where he could cross paths with Chinese officials.

China canceled high-level security talks with Mattis that had been planned for mid-October in Beijing, the New York Times reported on Oct. 1.

Escalating Rhetoric

Trump called Mattis “sort of a Democrat” in a weekend interview with “60 Minutes.” He also hinted the former U.S. Marine Corps general may be planning to quit. Mattis is seen as a force for stability in foreign policy in the Trump administration, managing crises from North Korea to Syria under a leader who prides himself on his unpredictability.

Mattis “hasn’t told me” that he plans to leave, Trump added, without directly answering the question of whether he’d like the Pentagon chief to depart.

Mattis’s latest attempt to soften the White House’s messaging came amid escalating rhetoric between the U.S. and China in recent weeks, as the world’s two largest economies remain locked in a trade battle.

Maneuvers in the disputed South China Sea, including a close call between a U.S. and a Chinese destroyer, fueled Beijing’s concern that the U.S. wants to stop China from threatening its dominance of the Indo-Pacific.

Vice President Mike Pence ramped up the administration’s anti-China rhetoric in a speech, saying Beijing has created a “a whole-of-government approach” to sway U.S. public opinion, including spies, tariffs, coercive measures and a propaganda campaign.

And Trump accused the Chinese of meddling in U.S. congressional elections while at the United Nations General Assembly, saying President Xi Jinping might no longer be a friend.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/mattis-plays-down-tensions-china-015735167.html
 
.
Which obviously means they do try to contain China and they do try to gain unfair advantages and do lack the respect and so on but that's all they can afford right now...
 
.
If you look at Mike Pence's speech it's actually directed more at the CCP, which they think it has backtracked political reforms set forth by Deng in recent years, rather than China as a country. Even though the media haven't said much about the negotiations I think under the table they are pressuring China to make not just economic reforms but political reforms too.

Former Chief Strategist:
 
.
If you look at Mike Pence's speech it's actually directed more at the CCP, which they think it has backtracked political reforms set forth by Deng in recent years, rather than China as a country. Even though the media haven't said much about the negotiations I think under the table they are pressuring China to make not just economic reforms but political reforms too.

Former Chief Strategist:
US is getting very anxious and will do anything to remain the world's only superpower
 
.
nothing keep the same for ever otherwise the first empire should still ruling yes empires some live long some live short like the soviet empire lived shortly while the British empire lived longer now the US being in power for 70-80 years and still strong enough to continue now for how long no one knows
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom