What's new

The systematic removal of Judge Malik to overturn NS's sentence

. .

This whole matter is a godsend if pursued fully.
They called that crook judge Qayyum.
They ambushed SC and CJ had to escape.
They sent Crook SC judge Tarar with briefcases to Quetta to wedge SC judges.
Both Judiciary and establishment pamper them too much and now they just cant fathom what's happening with them.
Rabbit hole goes very deep.
 
.
Why Judge Malik kept meeting Nawaz and co while being judge of their case? He should be shamed and put in jail for corruption. After that new Nawaz Sharif trial can begin with hopefully honest judge at charge.

Now saying he was being blackmailed by Nawaz family even if true sound suspicious.
 
. . .
Lesson & the moral.

In All top cases, judges should be protected & guarded by intelligence agency of Pakistan.

Which includes panama, fake accounts & money laundering related cases

@Shane what do you say?
I concur, a very pertinent point. But it is a tightrope as corruption hounds and libtards in toe are always looking to malign and implicate agencies, strangely more so when mega corrupt are involved. What could be the reason? Lol.

I am sure they do keep a security parameter, specially if there is suspicion of foul play or suspicious activity is reported.

There is always more than meets the eyes, like videos of video makers themselves caught in the act.

Reportedly, there are some videos by some others, of Pmln video makers along with their judge while they were making those videos, lol.

 
.
You meant you are one of sharif’s son or a hidden one ?
Probably Ishaq Dar himself must be active defending his figure fudging and economic slow poisoning days of loot and plunder. He has nothing better to do these days anyway. Ishaq Dar has the same mediocre mannerism, Intelligence Quotient and suspended logic as is generally on display here by any average PMLN street thug cum leader like Nasir Butt.
 
. .
Probably Ishaq Dar himself must be active defending his figure fudging and economic slow poisoning days of loot and plunder. He has nothing better to do these days anyway. Ishaq Dar has the same mediocre mannerism, Intelligence Quotient and suspended logic as is generally on display here by any average PMLN street thug cum leader like Nasir Butt.


Bro you won’t ( not want )believe me !

I was thinking the same since the first post I’ve seen from him ! Especially since when he have said he is in England and has hundreds workers under him !
 
Last edited:
. .
Yeah after he got exposed in video. Should have come forward when they blackmailed him, too late now dummy.
Chicken and eggs. If judge had gone forward first, PMLN mafia would have released his video anyway claiming he was asking for bribes :D
 
.
You meant to say the Havaldar version is more appropriate for health. Unfortunately i always see the both for better understandings!!!!:big_boss:

Another thing i do this for hobby, but you may say what you please,may be Allah knows the best. I can say it with confidence my income is more than this whole forum combined.:astagh:

What is there to answer.

Atizaz Ashan has given a details information about this in his interview to Dawn.

If this is the smoking gun than why doesnt Maryam Safdar files a petition in Supreme Court on the basis of these videos.

Once she files the petition she has to make sure following people are available for evidence:

1. the person who recorded the video
2. the person who recorded the audio
3. The PML N fella who is also wanted for murders;
4. The other person who is seen in the video.
5. the person who downloaded the video from the recording device and stored in onto storage medium
6. any person who edited or compiled the video.
7. Herself as to how she accessed the videos and also answer the question about other videos she has.​

Once these people give evidence about the video and the judge has to give evidence about the video and its content.

If the judge as he has filed the affidavit still asserts that Maryam and her gang was blackmailing him than the SC judges have to look at whether there was miscarriage of justice.

Only after than will there be re-trial.

She will not do this as she knows she will be digging a bigger hole for her. Yes it does put a question mark mainly on the verdict in which her father was acquitted.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom