What's new

The Sack of Baghdad(End of golden Age of Islam).

Harry Potter

BANNED
Joined
Dec 14, 2011
Messages
600
Reaction score
0
Mongol Siege of Baghdad

mongol-bagdad

Date:

22 January–10 February 1258.

Location:

on the Tigris River, approximately 500 miles upriver from the Persian Gulf.

Forces Engaged:

Mongol: possibly 200,000. Commander: Hulagu.

Arab: unknown, reportedly 100,000 citizens in the city. Commander: Caliph Mustasim.

Importance:

Mongol destruction of Baghdad made it a minor city until modern times.

Historical Setting

In the wake of Genghis Khan’s death in 1227, the Mongols continued conquering, with their horsemen reaching eastern Europe and threatening the Middle East. In the 1230s, the Mongols pastured in the region of modern Georgia and Azerbaijan, while in the Middle East rival populations fought among themselves rather than face the Asian conquerors: crusaders and Muslims struggled in the Holy Land, Byzantines and Seljuk Turks fought over Anatolia, while in Egypt the Mamluke dynasty was beginning its rise to power.

In the 1250s the great khan was Mangu. His brother, Hulagu, commanded the Mongols of the southwestern sphere and he began extending Mongol power into Persia. There, the primary obstacle was the cult of the Assassins, who had terrorized the area since 1090. When he was informed that the Assassins were targeting him, Mangu ordered Hulagu to remove them. Hulagu led his troops into the mountains of northern Persia, where the Assassins held a hundred fortresses protecting their main headquarters at Alamut. He reduced a number of them before reaching Alamut, which held out for three years before Grand Master Rukn ad-Din sued for peace. He surrendered on 19 November 1256, but none of his followers were spared. Men, women, and children were all slaughtered; the historian Juvaini who was traveling with Hulagu wrote that “the world was cleansed” of them. Hulagu’s men proceeded to destroy the remaining castles and kill all the inhabitants until no Assassins were left. Only Rukn ad-Din was spared, to be presented to Mangu, but the great khan refused to meet with him. The grand master was killed afterward, probably by his guards.

With the Assassins gone, Hulagu directed his army westward toward Baghdad, seat of Caliph Mustasim, spiritual leader of all Islam. As the Mongols practiced a strict tolerance for all religions, a faith that was aggressive in spreading its own word was too much of a threat to the Pax Mongolica. Further, Mangu’s chief wife was a Nestorian Christian who harbored no love for Islam. Hulagu’s army was reinforced by other Mongols fresh from battles against the Seljuk Turks and with a contingent of Christian soldiers from Georgia. Hulagu sent messengers to the caliph, asking why he had not provided aid in the campaign against the Assassins; such an oversight could only be corrected by tearing down Baghdad’s walls and swearing fealty to Mangu.

Mustasim was no match for the Mongols, but he had the experience of history on his side. He reminded Hulagu, in a haughty response, that many armies had tried and failed to take Baghdad. Unfortunately, Mustasim could not back up history with contemporary strength. The city walls had long been in disrepair and the caliph’s grand vizier Ibn al-Alkami was a self-serving sycophant who exercised entirely too much influence over Mustasim. The vizier assured the caliph that all of Islam would rise up to protect the center of the faith, although Mustasim’s generals argued for an immediate call-up of troops and repairs to the walls. Comfortable in his conceit, Mustasim continued his profligate ways and ignored any warnings. He had 50,000 soldiers on hand, but although “the caliph still had the authority to summon soldiers from all the Moslem empires, there were only two of them left, and while his taunting opposition had lost him the loyalty of the Mamluks, the princes of Syria, whom he had supported, were already busy preparing their own defences” (Chambers, The Devil’s Horsemen, p. 144).

Several more exchanges of messages, arriving from increasingly nearer Mongol forces, finally convinced Mustasim to offer tribute, but not loyalty. That provoked Hulagu to order his men into four columns to strike Baghdad. Finally Mustasim ordered work done on the walls and the arming of the citizenry, but Ibn al-Alkami continued to subvert the defense. He allegedly was in secret contact with Hulagu and was hoping that he could trade his treason to Mustasim for the caliph’s throne under the Mongols. Further, as a Shi’ite, the vizier had often persecuted the region’s Sunni Muslims, so they decided they had little interest in answering the caliph’s call for troops.

As word of the Mongols’ approach reached Mustasim, he finally ordered 20,000 cavalry out of the city to confront them on 11 January 1258. It was a futile gesture. The Mongols broke the Tigris River dikes and flooded the Muslim camp; when the troops engaged, most of the Muslims had either drowned or fled. Few returned to Baghdad. By the 18th the Mongols stood before the city.

The Siege

Baghdad, although the center of religion in the Islamic world, had long been a fading flower intellectually and commercially. By the time of the siege the business district was almost deserted and was therefore easily occupied. Mongols also soon took over the city suburbs, dug a ditch around the city’s eastern walls, and brought up their catapults. With little stone in the area, ammunition had to be brought from the mountains. Until that time the Mongols used tree trunks, and stone pillaged from the houses, to bombard the city. They also shot arrows into the city with messages promising safety to any who would surrender. Mustasim finally sent messengers offering to swear fealty, but it was too late. Hulagu by this point would accept only unconditional surrender.

After round-the-clock bombardment, the Mongols launched their assault on 6 February. They were soon in possession of the eastern wall. Once in possession, Hulagu stopped the attack and sent in messengers calling on the defending soldiers to surrender, implying that they would be allowed safe passage to Syria. They were not. Instead, as they marched out of the city unarmed, Hulagu had them executed. Mustasim offered up himself, his three sons, and 3,000 courtiers, all of whom were taken prisoner. That encouraged the population to emerge, but they too found themselves slaughtered as had the soldiers. Only those who sought refuge in the Christian churches were spared as the sack began on 13 February.

Results

Mustasim watched his citizens being slaughtered, then he lost his own life on the 15th. Hulagu had feasted with Mustasim as the city was being sacked, taunting him: why did you not use your immense wealth to pay your soldiers? After revealing the location of his hidden treasure, Mustasim and his sons were sewn up in carpets and trampled by Mongol horses. The number of Muslim citizens killed is open to question, but the estimates range from 80,000 to a million. The Mongols were finally obliged to remove their camp to avoid the smell of ******* corpses.

Two wagon trains of treasure left Baghdad for Karakorum, the Mongol capital and Mangu’s home. Baghdad was looted for a month, until few citizens or buildings remained standing. Ibn al-Alkami survived to be named ruler of the city’s remains, but he lived only three months, dying it is said of a broken heart.

The fall of Baghdad motivated most of the Muslim fortress cities to surrender. Only Aleppo fell in combat, to a combined force of Mongols and crusaders, who saw the steppe horsemen as allies of convenience in their war against Islam. Mustasim’s death, along with that of his sons, brought to an end the Abbassid caliphate, established 500 years before by Muhammad’s uncle Abbas. All of Islam could have been in peril, but both timing and Mongol tradition saved them. As Genghis Khan’s death had stopped the invasion of Europe, so did Mangu’s death halt the sweep into the Middle East. Hulagu returned to Karakorum to take part in the election of the new great khan. He left behind a smaller army under his subordinate Kit-boga, who was defeated by Mamluk forces at Ain Jalut on 3 September 1260. That ended the threat of Mongol domination of the Middle East while making the Egyptian Mamluk dynasty the reigning power in the region.

When the Mongols sacked Baghdad in 1256 (or 1258) the Islamic Empire never recovered. Trade routes became unsafe. Urban life broke down. Individual communities drew in upon themselves in feudal isolation. Science and philosophy survived for a while in scattered pockets, but the Golden Age of Islam was at an end.

Mongol Siege of Baghdad
Hulagu Khan the great follower of Tengrism was mighty conqueror indeed.He ended that Abbasid empire.
 
Yes, is the Mongol invasion the reason why Khan became a popular last name in Islam?
 
There are very valid arguments against the claim the title makes (haven't read the article yet, too long). That invasion is rather seen as the agent that reinvigorated the ummah. When Muslim people become a burden on the advancement of God's global project it is said that they are replaced by another. This invasion gave us a new set of people, the Turks and Mongols, which were a dying kingdom themselves after Changez Khan (and thus reinvigorated even the Mongols), that themselves became Muslim (to whatever degree is immaterial) and brought civilization to much of the northern belt from the Caucasus into western China down to India.

Drawing a modern parallel, the 2003 invasion of 3iraq could lead to a new and better 3iraq and to the longevity of the US.

Yes, is the Mongol invasion the reason why Khan became a popular last name in Islam?
Not directly. The Arabs didn't adapt the name, otherwise we'd have many Qans today. Yes Qan is how the Arabs called the Khan (Han if you're Chinese). The title of Khan is popular in the belt that arches North East over the Arabs. The Turks ruled In Iran (Safawis), Turkey (3uthmani) and India (Chaghtai (of whom the Mughals were the last dynasty)). Whence my mum's family title Khaqan (Khan of Khans).

Now I also understand where the word Tengri (=God) entered Urdu. It's a synonym of Khuda, and has gone obsolete in modern times.
 
It's Turkic for God. Some elderly from older Muslim families (i.e. of north-western provenance) from the UP or Dilli etc still know this word, although it has fallen off the public vocabulary.
 
Now I also understand where the word Tengri (=God) entered Urdu. It's a synonym of Khuda, and has gone obsolete in modern times.

Tengri is an Mongolic/Turkic word for God '' in modern Turkish, tanrı''. Tengri was called god of sky and everything under it... Thats where our two of the holiest symbols come from...

Wolf = Asena, female wolf who gave birth to Turkish nation. Also Turkic and Mongolic people believed that Tengri would take wolfs shape when it came down to earth.

Cresendant = Comes from Turkic worship of Tengri, by worshiping sun, moon and stars (praticly worshiping of sky)
 
It was not the end of Islamic domination. It was a major setback which ended Muslim dominance for a century. Later, Mongols converted to Islam and Ottoman Islamic Empire gained domination again, which lasted up to early 18th Century, after which it lost power and British and French empire gained dominance.

More accurately speaking, the Era of Islamic dominance starts from 661 AD when the Persian and Byzantine (Roman) empires, which were superpowers at that time, were conquered. 661 AD to early 18th Century was the era of Islamic domination, barring one century in the midst. That is 1240 - 100 = About 1140 years.

Gog and Magog was released in the lifetime of the prophet, which eventually succeeded in conquering Jerusalem in 1917, which ended Islamic power completely. Now, there is no state which submits to the authority of God, as required in Islam - not Pakistan, not KSA not anyone. Effectively, Islam has 0 political power now. All so-called Islamic countries are secular states.

Islamic dominance will return again when Jesus pbuh returns and kills the false Messiah, Dajjal. This time, the whole world would be conquered by Islam (Pax Islamica) and not a single person who does not believe in God will remain, according to what is prophecised by the blessed Prophet pbuh.
 
There are very valid arguments against the claim the title makes (haven't read the article yet, too long). That invasion is rather seen as the agent that reinvigorated the ummah. When Muslim people become a burden on the advancement of God's global project it is said that they are replaced by another. This invasion gave us a new set of people, the Turks and Mongols, which were a dying kingdom themselves after Changez Khan (and thus reinvigorated even the Mongols), that themselves became Muslim (to whatever degree is immaterial) and brought civilization to much of the northern belt from the Caucasus into western China down to India.

I have reservations about this part because they didn't bring civilization but came to destroy other civilizations. Bakhtiyar Khilji, landed in my land in 1197AD and put Nalanda University and Vikramshila University on fire(Nalanda University's library burnt for many days) and I don't remember what civilization they brought to our land.

But I do have regards for Mughals, they made contributions.
 
I have reservations about this part because they didn't bring civilization but came to destroy other civilizations. Bakhtiyar Khilji, landed in my land in 1197AD and put Nalanda University and Vikramshila University on fire(Nalanda University's library burnt for many days) and I don't remember what civilization they brought to our land.

But I do have regards for Mughals, they made contributions.
Brought THEIR civilization, I should've specified. Thanks for pointing it out.

Their civilization was, well what what Mongol hordes are known for, and it bore the same effects on existing civilizations, Hindu, Zoroastrian Or Muslim alike.

An anecdote is well-known after the fall of Baghdad: some commanders of the Mongol army accepted Islam (a fact which is a historic aberration because conquerors don't embrace the way of life of the conquered) and their foot-soldiers followed suit. Some of these men were drinking in the streets of Baghdad and raising a drunkard din. A chief scholar of Baghdad was passing by and people drew his attention to the fact and told him to go tell them drinking wasn't permissible. His reply: these guys just became Muslim days ago, while they've been killing and plundering for decades each, if they were to stop being drunk, they'd go back to doing what they do best when not drunk! Old habits die hard, and civilizations too have great cultural inertia.
 
There are very valid arguments against the claim the title makes (haven't read the article yet, too long). That invasion is rather seen as the agent that reinvigorated the ummah. When Muslim people become a burden on the advancement of God's global project it is said that they are replaced by another. This invasion gave us a new set of people, the Turks and Mongols, which were a dying kingdom themselves after Changez Khan (and thus reinvigorated even the Mongols), that themselves became Muslim (to whatever degree is immaterial) and brought civilization to much of the northern belt from the Caucasus into western China down to India.

Drawing a modern parallel, the 2003 invasion of 3iraq could lead to a new and better 3iraq and to the longevity of the US.


Not directly. The Arabs didn't adapt the name, otherwise we'd have many Qans today. Yes Qan is how the Arabs called the Khan (Han if you're Chinese). The title of Khan is popular in the belt that arches North East over the Arabs. The Turks ruled In Iran (Safawis), Turkey (3uthmani) and India (Chaghtai (of whom the Mughals were the last dynasty)). Whence my mum's family title Khaqan (Khan of Khans).

Now I also understand where the word Tengri (=God) entered Urdu. It's a synonym of Khuda, and has gone obsolete in modern times.
i thought tengri means leg piece of chicken or mutton. :)

most of the muslim world apparently are the progeny of chengiz khan and his soldiers. I heard that he and his sons would kill men and impregnate the women and spread their barbaric genes
 
Brought THEIR civilization, I should've specified. Thanks for pointing it out.

Their civilization was, well what what Mongol hordes are known for, and it bore the same effects on existing civilizations, Hindu, Zoroastrian Or Muslim alike.

An anecdote is well-known after the fall of Baghdad: some commanders of the Mongol army accepted Islam (a fact which is a historic aberration because conquerors don't embrace the way of life of the conquered) and their foot-soldiers followed suit. Some of these men were drinking in the streets of Baghdad and raising a drunkard din. A chief scholar of Baghdad was passing by and people drew his attention to the fact and told him to go tell them drinking wasn't permissible. His reply: these guys just became Muslim days ago, while they've been killing and plundering for decades each, if they were to stop being drunk, they'd go back to doing what they do best when not drunk! Old habits die hard, and civilizations too have great cultural inertia.


I think they brought cultures of Iranians in the sub-continent instead of their own Turkic or Mongol culture. They made Persian as their court language and Urdu to major extent and Hindi to lesser extent has mainly Persian loanwords instead of Turkish language. Our Hindustani music was also influenced by Persian Music and food culture was also influenced by that of Iran. But I think Sufi traditions are Turkic in nature.
 
It didn't end the golden age of Islam...
 
Back
Top Bottom