What's new

The race to 5G wireless tech is on. A report finds Americans may have an early lead.

F-22Raptor

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
16,980
Reaction score
3
Country
United States
Location
United States
U.S. policymakers keep wringing their hands over a competition with China to build the world’s first mass-market 5G wireless network. But a new report from Cisco may offer reasons to breathe easier for now.

By 2022, fifth-generation cellular networks will power as many as 9 percent of mobile data connections across North America, Cisco said, compared with just 4 percent in Asia. The new projections were unveiled Tuesday as part of Cisco’s annual Visual Networking Index report, which studies industry trends.

The report underscores the substantial work that countries like China face as they seek to out-develop Western nations. And it reflects U.S. policies that put the United States in a strong position to lead, said Cisco, which makes networking technology.

Proponents say 5G will offer download speeds faster than what many households receive on their home Internet connections. And, they say, 5G’s reliability will unlock new capabilities such as self-driving cars, remote medicine and a thriving ecosystem of smart appliances that require a constant connection.

Although the Asia-Pacific region will be home to more than twice the number of 5G devices compared with North America by 2022, 5G connections will account for just a tiny share of the mobile devices in that region, according to Cisco. 5G connections will account for a greater share of mobile devices in Western Europe, about 6.5 percent.

Tuesday marks the first time Cisco has dedicated an entire section in its mobile report to 5G technology.

“The U.S. has made a good start in changing policies to support the deployment of 5G, and as we look around the rest of the world, policy changes of the type we’ve seen here in the U.S. have not yet happened,” said Mary Brown, senior director of government affairs at Cisco. “We do expect that’s going to be changing over the next 12 to 18 months, and so the race to 5G is very real.”

A head start in 5G penetration could be critical for determining which countries get to shape — and benefit from — the knock-on innovations in apps, services and other economic fruits of the technology, according to policy analysts. When the United States took the lead on 4G mobile technology, it gave rise to the app economy, which remains dominated by U.S.-based firms today, said Brown.

“The stakes with 5G are even higher," she said.

For now, a true 5G experience remains out of reach for the average consumer. The very first 5G smartphones aren’t expected until later this year; in the meantime, carriers such as AT&T and Verizon have been locked in a marketing war to convince customers that they’re making rapid progress (though AT&T was recently sued for some of its promotional activities).

Telecom executives, and many federal officials, have cited intense competition against global rivals as a reason to accelerate the spread of 5G in the United States with deregulation and policies favorable to the industry.

“U.S. leadership in 5G technology is a national imperative for economic growth and competitiveness,” said Ajit Pai, chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, at a White House summit on the issue last year. “We cannot let today’s red tape strangle the 5G future.”

Last year, in a bid to grease processes at the local level, the FCC moved to limit how much cities could charge telecom companies for using publicly owned utility poles and required swifter decisions on infrastructure permits.

The plan was welcomed by industry groups as a crucial step toward building 5G but was assailed by critics who said it amounted to a massive corporate handout.

“This effectively transfers $2 billion from cities to carriers,” Blair Levin, a former FCC chief of staff, wrote in a blog post last week. “In return, the FCC asks carriers for nothing.”

Complicating the picture are ongoing concerns about the security of networking equipment from companies such as China’s Huawei, which the Trump administration is expected to target with a possible executive order. The FCC, in a separate move, has proposed limiting federal funding to U.S. telecom companies that use Huawei’s hardware. Policymakers worry that foreign manufacturers could secretly install spyware in their products that could allow other governments to eavesdrop on sensitive U.S. communications. Huawei’s founder on Tuesday rejected those claims as speculation in an interview with CBS.

The uncertainty surrounding U.S. infrastructure policy, Washington’s stance on foreign firms and the details of 5G technology that are still being hammered out could result in delays.

“We anticipate that some large scale commercial 5G deployments may not be executed until after the current forecast period (after 2022),” Cisco said in its report.

But even after considering those factors, North America will wind up ahead of the competition in 5G penetration by 2022, Cisco found.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/tech...ns-have-an-early-lead/?utm_term=.dd0526b5d4bf
 
.
The US is ahead, right? That's why AT&T is fraudulently advertising 5G and your silly excuse for a government is screaming at the top of its lungs at everyone to ban Huawei. You're a real winner.

lol jk, you're a delusional sadsack from a country that's circling the drain. Here are your allies, "winner":

https://www.engadget.com/2019/02/19/germany-may-let-huawei-play-role-in-5g/

It's a blow to the US' attempt to show Huawei the door.

The UK isn't the only country skeptical of talking to the Wall Street Journal say the country has made a "preliminary decision" to let Huawei bid on contracts for 5G networking despite US pressure to ban the Chinese company. A cybersecurity agency investigation didn't show evidence that Huawei could steal data through its wireless equipment, the officials said, even though the country had US help. It also couldn't find proof that Huawei had done anything wrong, and conversations with the US and UK over potential security holes were ultimately "inconclusive."

Political leaders are expected to discuss the decision on the night of February 19th. There's no guarantee Huawei will receive the greenlight, though. While Chancellor Merkel and other top brass might agree, there's a chance members of the administration and parliament might balk over security fears.

Germany does have incentives to let Huawei in. One of the officials told the WSJ that Germany "missed the boat" on broadband due to its lack of fiber optics, and Huawei would give it a way to catch up without paying as much as it would for alternatives. If there isn't a demonstrable security risk, why hurt the country's chances?

Should the country allow Huawei's involvement, it might foil the US' overall attempts to deter its allies from using Huawei gear. If Germany (and earlier, the UK) believes Huawei gear is acceptable, that could lead other allies to follow suit and continue doing business with the Chinese tech giant. The anti-Huawei campaign might only have a limited effect if there isn't support for it outside of the US and a handful of countries like Australia.

:omghaha:
 
.
The US is ahead, right? That's why AT&T is fraudulently advertising 5G and your silly excuse for a government is screaming at the top of its lungs at everyone to ban Huawei. You're a real winner.

lol jk, you're a delusional sadsack from a country that's circling the drain. Here are your allies, "winner":

https://www.engadget.com/2019/02/19/germany-may-let-huawei-play-role-in-5g/

It's a blow to the US' attempt to show Huawei the door.

The UK isn't the only country skeptical of talking to the Wall Street Journal say the country has made a "preliminary decision" to let Huawei bid on contracts for 5G networking despite US pressure to ban the Chinese company. A cybersecurity agency investigation didn't show evidence that Huawei could steal data through its wireless equipment, the officials said, even though the country had US help. It also couldn't find proof that Huawei had done anything wrong, and conversations with the US and UK over potential security holes were ultimately "inconclusive."

Political leaders are expected to discuss the decision on the night of February 19th. There's no guarantee Huawei will receive the greenlight, though. While Chancellor Merkel and other top brass might agree, there's a chance members of the administration and parliament might balk over security fears.

Germany does have incentives to let Huawei in. One of the officials told the WSJ that Germany "missed the boat" on broadband due to its lack of fiber optics, and Huawei would give it a way to catch up without paying as much as it would for alternatives. If there isn't a demonstrable security risk, why hurt the country's chances?

Should the country allow Huawei's involvement, it might foil the US' overall attempts to deter its allies from using Huawei gear. If Germany (and earlier, the UK) believes Huawei gear is acceptable, that could lead other allies to follow suit and continue doing business with the Chinese tech giant. The anti-Huawei campaign might only have a limited effect if there isn't support for it outside of the US and a handful of countries like Australia.

:omghaha:
Got to look at the little things. When 3G was out they say Chinese cannot afford smartphones. When 4 G was out, they say Chinese cannot lead in telecommunications. Not it's only America may lead.

That says it all doesn't it.

This is why while I don't like Gordon Chang, at least he says it like China death tomorrow prepare now. He's certain about it. Certainly wrong, but certain never the less. These guys are just may or may not, which is their way of saying they have no idea what they are talking about.
 
.
Is that the same Cisco that has "backdoor" installed on all its products and repeatedly discovered by others?
 
.
If it is about deployment and "early lead" then that make sense. But if Cisco could not provide 5G solution ahead or at least comparable to what Huawei can offer then the leadership finally can't be sustained.
 
. . . .
Uncle Sam, I know what you did last summer. Remember "Prism".
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom