What's new

The PLA's modernization and its implications - Part I: Anti-ship ballistic missiles

China's Military Has Surpassed US in Ships, Missiles and Air Defense

1 Sep 2020
Military.com | By Richard Sisk


China's People's Liberation Army (PLA) has already surpassed the U.S. in missile development and its number of warships and air defense systems under the Chinese Communist Party's plan to achieve dominance by 2049, the Defense Department said in a sobering report Tuesday.

The ultimate goal of the People's Republic of China, or PRC, is to "develop a military by mid-Century that is equal to -- or in some cases superior to -- the U.S. military, or that of any other great power that the PRC views as a threat," the DoD's annual report to Congress said.


To that end, the PRC has "marshalled the resources, technology, and political will over the past two decades to strengthen and modernize the PLA in nearly every respect," the report said.

Under the national strategy pressed by Chinese President Xi Jinping, the result has been that "China is already ahead of the United States in certain areas" essential to its overall aim of progressing from homeland and periphery defense to global power projection, the report said.


"The PRC has the largest navy in the world, with an overall battle force of approximately 350 ships and submarines, including over 130 major surface combatants," the report said.

That's compared to the U.S. Navy's current battle force of 295 ships.

In addition, "the PRC has more than 1,250 ground-launched ballistic missiles (GLBMs) and ground-launched cruise missiles (GLCMs) with ranges between 500 and 5,500 kilometers," while the U.S. currently fields one type of conventional GLBM with a range of 70 to 300 kilometers and no GLCMs, the report said.

In some respects, China is also ahead on integrated air defense systems with a mix of Russian-built and homegrown systems, the report said.

"The PRC has one of the world's largest forces of advanced long-range surface-to-air systems" -- including Russian-built S-400, S-300, and domestically-produced anti-air systems -- making up "part of its robust and redundant integrated air defense system," the report said.

Despite the advances, the PLA "remains in a position of inferiority" to the U.S. in overall military strength, said Chad Sbragia, the deputy assistant secretary of Defense for China.

The 173-page DoD report "does not claim that China's military is 10 feet tall," but the Chinese Communist Party wants it to be, and has the plan and resources to reach that goal, Sbragia, a retired Marine officer, said at an American Enterprise Institute forum on China's military.

At an earlier Pentagon briefing on the report, Sbragia said Beijing's military strategy was driven by the view that the U.S. has decided upon a long period of confrontation to counter the global spread of China's influence.

He said that China "increasingly views the United States as more willing to confront Beijing on matters where the U.S. and PRC interests are inimical."

"The CCP leaders view the United States' security alliances and partnerships -- especially those in the Indo-Pacific region -- as destabilizing and irreconcilable with China's interests," Sbragia said.

The DoD report, titled "Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic of China" comes about two weeks before Congress is set to return from recess to convene a Senate-House Conference Committee on the National Defense Authorization Act and the defense budget for Fiscal Year 2021.

Defense Secretary Mark Esper has acknowledged downward pressures on the defense budget to offset the enormous costs of the COVID-19 response while arguing for sustained increases of 3-5% in defense spending in future years to maintain U.S. superiority and readiness.

The 20th annual report on China by DoD noted the "staggering" improvements in China's ability to build, coordinate and project power since the first report was issued.

"DoD's first annual report to Congress in 2000 assessed the PRC's armed forces at that time to be a sizable but mostly archaic military that was poorly suited to the CCP's long-term ambitions," the report said.

In 2000, "the PLA lacked the capabilities, organization, and readiness for modern warfare," the report said. But the CCP, it added, recognized the shortcomings and set about with determination to "strengthen and transform its armed forces in a manner commensurate with its aspirations to strengthen and transform China."

"More striking than the PLA's staggering amounts of new military hardware are the recent sweeping efforts taken by CCP leaders that include completely restructuring the PLA into a force better suited for joint operations" and for "expanding the PRC's overseas military footprint."

The PLA has already established its first overseas military base in Djibouti, about a mile from U.S. Africa Command's main base on the Horn of Africa.

In its commentary on the DoD assessment, the American Enterprise Institute noted that the report also stressed that "The PRC has likely considered locations for PLA military logistics facilities in Myanmar, Thailand, Singapore, Indonesia, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, United Arab Emirates, Kenya, Seychelles, Tanzania, Angola, and Tajikistan."

Despite the progress made by China's military over the past two decades, "major gaps and shortcomings remain" in readiness and operational capability, the report said, but China's leaders are acutely aware of the problems and have detailed plans to overcome them.

"Of course, the CCP does not intend for the PLA to be merely a showpiece of China's modernity or to keep it focused solely on regional threats," the report said.

"As this report shows, the CCP desires the PLA to become a practical instrument of its statecraft with an active role in advancing the PRC's foreign policy, particularly with respect to the PRC's increasingly global interests and its aims to revise aspects of the international order," it added.

 
.
ASBM can work against groups of movingtargets in a single shot.Just rain many bomblets.
The better idea is combine small bomblets and singular big warheads altogether, and maybe include ECM warheads as well. In some Chinese forums, some suggested having 20 DF-21D or DF-26 missiles attacking on a single aircraft carrier in the first round attack. Economically it is feasible and mixed warheads definitely can be used.

BTW using ASBM to hit a moving ship with very high velocity was successfully tested by Soviet long long time ago. Pakistan also has CM-400AKG, which is ASBM although in much smaller size. The Pakistanis wouldn't have procured the model without having substantial testing.

The biggest challenge to ASBM is not hitting moving targets. The biggest challenge is having sensors constantly tracking the targets and getting to know where they are accurately.

wv0ORkO.jpg


Of course Soviet didn't continue the development of ASBM because during the time they only had radio detecting satellites, which can be easily fooled by the Americans and are not comparable to today's sensors made of modern electronics and optics. They gave up and turned to ASCMs.
 
Last edited:
.
Following information is relevant to this discussion:

"We launched the DF-21 and DF-26, and the missiles hit a vessel sailing south of the Paracel Islands," Wang said during a closed-door gathering in China's eastern Zhejiang province in October, according to the South China Morning Post. “Shortly after that, an American military attaché in Geneva, [Switzerland] complained and said it would lead to severe consequences if the missiles hit an American aircraft carrier. They see this as a show of force. But we are doing this because of their provocation."


Wang does not appear to have given any details about the target ship, its construction, how fast it might have been moving, or how the PLA may have cued the missiles their target.

It remains unclear exactly how many missiles the PLA fired during the exercise on Aug. 26. South China Morning Post's initial report had indicated that two weapons had been launched, one DF-26B and one DF-21D, from sites in China's northwestern Qinghai province and in Zhejiang, respectively. A subsequent report from Reuters said that the U.S. government had assessed that the Chinese had fired four ballistic missiles, in total.

"The Department of Defense is concerned about the People’s Republic of China (PRC) recent decision to conduct military exercises, including the firing of ballistic missiles, around the Paracel Islands in the South China Sea on August 23-29," the Pentagon said in a statement on Aug. 27. "The PRC’s actions, including missile tests, further destabilize the situation in the South China Sea."

The statement did not say anything about how many missiles the Chinese had fired in total or what types they had employed in the drill.

The DF-26B and the DF-21D are both understood to have maneuvering reentry vehicles capable at least of hitting large ships, such as aircraft carriers or large amphibious assault ships. The DF-21D has a maximum range in excess of 932 miles (1,500 kilometers), according to the Pentagon, while DF-26-series missiles can reportedly strike targets out to 2,500 miles.

FULL READ in the following LINK: https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zo...-struck-moving-ship-in-south-china-sea-report
 
.
Following information is relevant to this discussion:

"We launched the DF-21 and DF-26, and the missiles hit a vessel sailing south of the Paracel Islands," Wang said during a closed-door gathering in China's eastern Zhejiang province in October, according to the South China Morning Post. “Shortly after that, an American military attaché in Geneva, [Switzerland] complained and said it would lead to severe consequences if the missiles hit an American aircraft carrier. They see this as a show of force. But we are doing this because of their provocation."


Wang does not appear to have given any details about the target ship, its construction, how fast it might have been moving, or how the PLA may have cued the missiles their target.

It remains unclear exactly how many missiles the PLA fired during the exercise on Aug. 26. South China Morning Post's initial report had indicated that two weapons had been launched, one DF-26B and one DF-21D, from sites in China's northwestern Qinghai province and in Zhejiang, respectively. A subsequent report from Reuters said that the U.S. government had assessed that the Chinese had fired four ballistic missiles, in total.

"The Department of Defense is concerned about the People’s Republic of China (PRC) recent decision to conduct military exercises, including the firing of ballistic missiles, around the Paracel Islands in the South China Sea on August 23-29," the Pentagon said in a statement on Aug. 27. "The PRC’s actions, including missile tests, further destabilize the situation in the South China Sea."

The statement did not say anything about how many missiles the Chinese had fired in total or what types they had employed in the drill.

The DF-26B and the DF-21D are both understood to have maneuvering reentry vehicles capable at least of hitting large ships, such as aircraft carriers or large amphibious assault ships. The DF-21D has a maximum range in excess of 932 miles (1,500 kilometers), according to the Pentagon, while DF-26-series missiles can reportedly strike targets out to 2,500 miles.

FULL READ in the following LINK: https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zo...-struck-moving-ship-in-south-china-sea-report
This is old news. The tracking and NOTAM data from Henri indicates two missiles were fired. The "four missiles" is either just outright error or misinterpretation of two missiles launching four objects - two warheads and two sensor modules, as I discussed in the OP.

I would love to know about how the tracking worked end-to-end, but the PLA will never release that kind of information.

Edit: I forgot to mention - amateur video taken at the time of the test also indicates that only two missiles were fired.
 
.
This is old news. The tracking and NOTAM data from Henri indicates two missiles were fired. The "four missiles" is either just outright error or misinterpretation of two missiles launching four objects - two warheads and two sensor modules, as I discussed in the OP.

I would love to know about how the tracking worked end-to-end, but the PLA will never release that kind of information.

Edit: I forgot to mention - amateur video taken at the time of the test also indicates that only two missiles were fired.
OK, thanks.

DF-26 (IRBM class) striking a ship of any size is very impressive and a big leap in ASBM capability. Therefore, this news is worth mention in this thread.
 
.
DF-26 (IRBM class) striking a ship of any size is very impressive and a big leap in ASBM capability. Therefore, this news is worth mention in this thread.
Maybe. I see the DF-26 in an anti-ship role as a natural evolution of the DF-21D. The next major revolution will come when we see hypersonic glide vehicles like the DF-17 being used in an anti-ship role. There's also the air-launched ballistic missile carried by the H-6N.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom