The Pakistan Nuclear Nightmare

[NHUDA]

King Pins in India STILLL wins on Anti-India Rhetoric ... Recent Most Election Campaign is evident of that .... (when was the last time in Pakistan an election was campaigned around india ??? {Bilawal have been infact mocked for Making use of the issue as its political return})

Yet India & "world" (Read: economic beneficiaries of indian Payroll) Wants Pakistan to let go of Multiple threats from india & NOT develop a full spectrum ...

Did they Forgot;
1- It was India who tested the Devices First & a significant threat was posed, should Pakistan never have tested the Devices.
2- The Nuclear Deterrent have Worked in 1999 & 2001 & 2008 ... instead of Annihilation of Hundred Thousands (instead of full blown War), it has justified its existence as a "DETERRENT" ....
3- LOC is not IB & Pakistan will keep up the attempts to complete the Unfinished Business... the Nukes with Pakistan make sure India does not turn it into a full blown War (It is a War, we Play by our Strengths & this is one of the leverage...
learn to live by it)
3- the Tactical Nukes are also a response to Indian Mindset of Surgical Strike & Cold Start ... the More India Will grow Conventionally the More Pakistan has to modify its Nuclear doctrine in order to serve its ACTUAL purpose .. DETER india.
4- Our Neighbors immediately Jump over the mention of Conventional disparity between the Two Nations (All this is for China) ... well Please provide us in Written, that in case of an Skirmish or War with Pakistan What kind of Weapons U will use & what U will not use ... (otherwise IF ALL indian Weapons are supposed to be used in the War) than don't say this Particular Squadron or those Destroyers are for China .. In case of War .. Even then i doubt U would remember that . & hence is our preparation !

Considering the Above Pakistan is not creating its Full Spectrum Capability to Show Off or Out of Hobby ... but out of Necessity ... !!!!

So Unless Someone Address these concerns of Pakistan (& some More) .... talking of One Way Surrender is all rubbish !!!

As for the Writer i don't have to say Much .. as one word i learned from my Friends in India would do the Job ... Presstitutes is it ! One person write any thing on the internet & world go Crazy -_-

 

[monitor]

If the west is so much paranoid about Pakistan's nuclear weapons especially tactical small warhead they should provide superior conventional weapons to Pakistan so that in any India Pakistan war Pakistan withstands Indian conventional superiority both in number and quality they are inducting.

 

[TankMan]

The ''International Community'' can not expect Pakistan to accept such bull when it comes to nuclear deterrence. Either apply the same standards to India and maintain deterrence, or shove these standards where the radiation doesn't shine.

 

[Paksanity]

King Pins in India STILLL wins on Anti-India Rhetoric ... Recent Most Election Campaign is evident of that .... (when was the last time in Pakistan an election was campaigned around india ??? {Bilawal have been infact mocked for Making use of the issue as its political return})

Yet India & "world" (Read: economic beneficiaries of indian Payroll) Wants Pakistan to let go of Multiple threats from india & NOT develop a full spectrum ...

Did they Forgot;
1- It was India who tested the Devices First & a significant threat was posed, should Pakistan never have tested the Devices.
2- The Nuclear Deterrent have Worked in 1999 & 2001 & 2008 ... instead of Annihilation of Hundred Thousands (instead of full blown War), it has justified its existence as a "DETERRENT" ....
3- LOC is not IB & Pakistan will keep up the attempts to complete the Unfinished Business... the Nukes with Pakistan make sure India does not turn it into a full blown War (It is a War, we Play by our Strengths & this is one of the leverage...
learn to live by it)
3- the Tactical Nukes are also a response to Indian Mindset of Surgical Strike & Cold Start ... the More India Will grow Conventionally the More Pakistan has to modify its Nuclear doctrine in order to serve its ACTUAL purpose .. DETER india.
4- Our Neighbors immediately Jump over the mention of Conventional disparity between the Two Nations (All this is for China) ... well Please provide us in Written, that in case of an Skirmish or War with Pakistan What kind of Weapons U will use & what U will not use ... (otherwise IF ALL indian Weapons are supposed to be used in the War) than don't say this Particular Squadron or those Destroyers are for China .. In case of War .. Even then i doubt U would remember that . & hence is our preparation !

Considering the Above Pakistan is not creating its Full Spectrum Capability to Show Off or Out of Hobby ... but out of Necessity ... !!!!

So Unless Someone Address these concerns of Pakistan (& some More) .... talking of One Way Surrender is all rubbish !!!

As for the Writer i don't have to say Much .. as one word i learned from my Friends in India would do the Job ... Presstitutes is it ! One person write any thing on the internet & world go Crazy -_-

Brilliant!

If the west is so much paranoid about Pakistan's nuclear weapons especially tactical small warhead they should provide superior conventional weapons to Pakistan so that in any India Pakistan war Pakistan withstands Indian conventional superiority both in number and quality they are inducting.

They won't or else they will loose their leverage to pressurise Pakistan on this issue. Serious government circles know Pakistan won't curtail its programme and will continue to match the threat but they will use media outlets to keep the pressure.

The ''International Community'' can not expect Pakistan to accept such bull when it comes to nuclear deterrence. Either apply the same standards to India and maintain deterrence, or shove these standards where the radiation doesn't shine.

It hurts them to see Pakistan have such capability. But it is a reality and they better come to terms with it.

 

[Ifteqar Aisan]

Pakistan Nuclear Programme guaranteed peace in the region and prevented war with India.
Without Nuclear deterrence Pakistan and India fought many wars since 1947. Now tactical Nukes are important to maintain full spectrum nuclear deterrence capability. Tactical Nukes can prevent short duration war, which indian so called military minds assumed that war is possible between both countries below Nuclear threshold.
If world is serious to curtail Pakistan Nuclear programme, or they want to convince Pakistan authorities to give away idea of tactical nukes, here are few steps before such development.
1. Convince india to curtail conventional capabilities against Pakistan to 1:1.
2. Resolve main issues , such as Kashmir, Terrorism and water.
3. Increase economic cooperation and interdependence

Without going into the debate about exactly what purpose is served by our nukes, about the formula that you propose:

1. India will not curtail its conventional capabilities, they have China to worry about. We can wish whatever we want, but realism helps.
2. India will not give us Kashmir, and as for the other issues, unless their ins international monitoring nothing can get done. They will say water issue is resolved, we will continue to deny it; we will say terrorism is solved, they will continue to deny it.
3. Increased economic cooperation is the only long-term viable option for peace, and should be pursued vigorously.

The ''International Community'' can not expect Pakistan to accept such bull when it comes to nuclear deterrence. Either apply the same standards to India and maintain deterrence, or shove these standards where the radiation doesn't shine.

The same standards do not apply to India for two reasons:

1. They have not been known to proliferate nuclear technology to third parties.
2. They have a "no first use policy".

The world understands nukes as deterrence against other nukes. When there is a "no first use" policy in play, that reason evaporates. Our deterrence policy may make sense to us, but the rest of the world views it differently.

 

[Neutron]

Without going into the debate about exactly what purpose is served by our nukes, about the formula that you propose:

1. India will not curtail its conventional capabilities, they have China to worry about. We can wish whatever we want, but realism helps.
2. India will not give us Kashmir, and as for the other issues, unless their ins international monitoring nothing can get done. They will say water issue is resolved, we will continue to deny it; we will say terrorism is solved, they will continue to deny it.
3. Increased economic cooperation is the only long-term viable option for peace, and should be pursued vigorously.

1. If india cannot curtail aggressive conventional posturing against Pakistan....... it is necessity of Pakistan to develop tactical nukes.
2. Without resolution of kashmir and other issues it is futile to expect peace in the region.

 

[Ifteqar Aisan]

1. If india cannot curtail aggressive conventional posturing against Pakistan....... it is necessity of Pakistan to develop tactical nukes.
2. Without resolution of kashmir and other issues it is futile to expect peace in the region.

Now you are changing your position from 1:1 parity to "curtail aggressive conventional posturing". They are not the same thing. The former is never going to happen, the latter ought to happen, and only the international community can monitor and ensure that.

About Kashmir and "other issues", that is very, very tricky. Pakistan would be justified in demanding international intervention in pending disputes. But India says otherwise. The question is, is Pakistan willing to put Kashmir on the backburner and proceed with talks? Our government says India uses terrorism as a bogey to not settle other disputes, but can't the Indians allege that we use Kashmir to do the same?

 

[Pindi Boy]

Pakistan is not our enemy ...China is. Convince China to curtail conventional capabilities to 1:1.with regard to India.

 

[Tricktor]

Conveniently forgot kargil war ? Nuclear weapons or no nuclear weapons war will take place if it has to .
It is just wishful thinking that india is deterred by nukes. Simply put india would not lose much even after a nuclear strike india can still fight a conventional war without resorting to nukes.

If wishes were horses beggars would be riding them.

LMAO! No, you don't seem to know anything about history, or the fact Russia and America have avoided war due to the nuclear deterrent. It is not wishful thinking, unless you think Indians don't mind dying in the millions and their country being destroyed. What a silly thing to say.

If going to war means Pakistan will make India into a Nuclear wasteland, and Pakistan will become one too, obviously India will not go to war. We all know India has been doing its best to instigate a war, begging for war, but they know we will not hesitate to make every Indian city a footnote in history if they dare.

This is not a news article, but really just your typical Jewish American racism. If one is concerned about dangerous nukes, why would they not even mention Israel?

This article will only play to ignorant Americans. It means nothing. Pakistan is the one that talks about peace talks, about resolving issues with India. India is the one that says no, and only talks about war. Modi keeps mentioning bombing Pakistan, while Sharif only mentions peace. Only a liar would not admit this.

The Muslim countries need to band together, and support the regional savior, Pakistan. Thankfully, we will never bow to American demands. Why on Earth would we allow India to try and destroy Pakistan? And why on Earth would we ever limit are military? That will never happen.

 

[MEAGAN FOXSS]

LMAO! No, you don't seem to know anything about history, or the fact Russia and America have avoided war due to the nuclear deterrent. It is not wishful thinking, unless you think Indians don't mind dying in the millions and their country being destroyed. What a silly thing to say.

If going to war means Pakistan will make India into a Nuclear wasteland, and Pakistan will become one too, obviously India will not go to war. We all know India has been doing its best to instigate a war, begging for war, but they know we will not hesitate to make every Indian city a footnote in history if they dare.

This is not a news article, but really just your typical Jewish American racism. If one is concerned about dangerous nukes, why would they not even mention Israel?

This article will only play to ignorant Americans. It means nothing. Pakistan is the one that talks about peace talks, about resolving issues with India. India is the one that says no, and only talks about war. Modi keeps mentioning bombing Pakistan, while Sharif only mentions peace. Only a liar would not admit this.

The Muslim countries need to band together, and support the regional savior, Pakistan. Thankfully, we will never bow to American demands. Why on Earth would we allow India to try and destroy Pakistan? And why on Earth would we ever limit are military? That will never happen.

Hahaha good one bro . . . . . .

 

[Aamir Hussain]

Whatever needs to be done by international community should be done on a comprehensive basis and on a regional basis and not Pakistan specific only.

It will be a non starter from Pakistani perspective. US and others should engage India to ramp down the Terr. rhetoric and talks of hot pursuit or cold start and engage Pakistan in a long term face saving solution of Kashmir for both sides.

Hostility towards each other, and tensions between the two neighbors needs to be brought down. Afghanistan, support to Kashmiri Freedom Fighters, Insurgency in Baluchistan, Support to Anti Govt. efforts in Karachi, need to be tackled.

Right now India is in quite a belligerent mode vis a vis Pakistan be it in the field of economics, sports, and military at all sorts of international forums.

Water crisis is building up, any one can see that.

Both GoP and GoI owe it to their people to resolve these resolvable issues with utmost priority and sincerity. Otherwise this region is a ticking bomb -- our fates are linked together because of geography -- both have fundos in their ranks -- sanity should prevail before and insane on any one side cash in all of our chips combined, for good.

 

[VCheng]

Whatever needs to be done by international community should be done on a comprehensive basis and on a regional basis and not Pakistan specific only.

Why? Look at the Iranian nuclear deal as an example which is quite country specific and not regional at all.

 

[Tricktor]

Whatever needs to be done by international community should be done on a comprehensive basis and on a regional basis and not Pakistan specific only.

It will be a non starter from Pakistani perspective. US and others should engage India to ramp down the Terr. rhetoric and talks of hot pursuit or cold start and engage Pakistan in a long term face saving solution of Kashmir for both sides.

Hostility towards each other, and tensions between the two neighbors needs to be brought down. Afghanistan, support to Kashmiri Freedom Fighters, Insurgency in Baluchistan, Support to Anti Govt. efforts in Karachi, need to be tackled.

Right now India is in quite a belligerent mode vis a vis Pakistan be it in the field of economics, sports, and military at all sorts of international forums.

Water crisis is building up, any one can see that.

Both GoP and GoI owe it to their people to resolve these resolvable issues with utmost priority and sincerity. Otherwise this region is a ticking bomb -- our fates are linked together because of geography -- both have fundos in their ranks -- sanity should prevail before and insane on any one side cash in all of our chips combined, for good.

Fundos exist in every country. The difference between Pakistan and India is, the fundos in India are the party leaders. Modi is basically the Indian Hitler. He is a vile murderer, who wants war.

We should not have any expectations in the international community. Forget the international community. They are all racists or corrupted by money interests. Remember, Modi was banned from entering UK and US due to being a murderous war criminal, but they changed their mind when he became PM due to money. They have zero problems with a butcher who promotes the murder and rape of innocents, as long as it is an Indian who brings them money.

What we should focus on is, united the Muslim world through nationalism, not through religion. We all need to be unified. The international community, outside of the Muslim world is only interested in one thing when it comes to Pakistan, how can we destroy them? First thing to do is, resolve Shia and Sunni issues. That is the most important step in the Muslim world. From there, everything can fall into place. There's a reason Israel and America have killed and murdered Secular Nationalist Arab movements for over 50 years. Secular nationalists in the Muslim world can solve our problems, but the west would rather see us divided and conquered.

One thing we all know is, no one, no matter what will ever convince us to inhibit our military. Never. Our military stops us from the Indian war mongers. Limiting our military is like asking us to kill ourselves.

 

[PakShaheen79]

For anyone who consider that Indian military buildup is against China and not Pakistan should see the map of deployment of Indian army and everything will be clear.

 

[Tricktor]

For anyone who consider that Indian military buildup is against China and not Pakistan should see the map of deployment of Indian army and everything will be clear.

It's an absolutely bizarre claim to make, that the Indian military buildup is about China, not Pakistan. The Indian government, and Modi are frequently, and openly talking about bombing Pakistan and about war.

Modi rejects peace. OPENLY. He says it almost every change he can get, that he wants to bomb Pakistan. It's not a secret. Yet this racist NYT article does not mention this. Modi is a very scary and frightening man. The one thing Modi has done is to remind every single Pakistani, why the creation of our country was necessary.