The only South Asians to defeat the Greeks-Mauryas

[LURKER]

How when both Chanakya and Maurya were actually punjabis just like rig vedic people who ruled bhaiyas in jungles of Bihar.

Jain source say Chanakya was born in South India , other sources say North India, Buddhist sources say Taxila, how can we say the Buddhist one as legitimate . Where are the Mauryas in Pakistan now btw

 

[Kabira]

Actually if anything, the Porus would rather associate himself with the militarily successful "midget" bhaiyyas than the present day population of your said country which has done nothing in history but rolled over in the face of invasion...

Most people like to be associated with success and power...you wont understand the concept of success...maybe change nationalities..

No offence but what sucess and power? Small country like Pakistan always give middle fimger to your kin.

Jain source say Chanakya was born in South India , other sources say North India, Buddhist sources say Taxila, how can we say the Buddhist one as legitimate . Where are the Mauryas in Pakistan now btw

Lol

Now chanakya was born in South India hahahah

Koi hal nai bc tumari nasal ka, no self respect. Maurya was just a name, jungli aborginal with maurya surname in bihar does not mean anything. I hope you are intelligent enough to understand that?

 

[ShahidT]

it is common knowledge in the streets of Punjab and Sindh and Kashmir and KPK and Baluchistan. All of Pakistan.

Iskandar e Azam is respected by the awaam

[ Iskander / Sikander is a very common name too ]

dont say all. lot of people in rural areas who are illiterate have misconception that he was muslim or that he was zul qarnain. if they find out this is false, and that he was pagan, respect will vanish. otherwise, what is difference between hulaku khan and sikandar? both were great conquerors, mass murderers and polytheists. thats why i say the most important single issue of Pakistan is education, esp. of the rural masses (majority), as lot of stupid ideas and being misled by bhangi fake pirs is cause of this.

 

[LURKER]

You mean Indoi which came from river Sindh. How its Indian? How can ganga bhaiyas claim anything which does not belong to them but mighty indus? Because you guys have no self respect.

Porus was a proud Hindu not a forcefully converted sissy like you. He fought till the end the characteristic you clearly lack

How can people with no self respect like you guys who gave in to any marauding invader easily claim a warrior like Porus

 

[Kabira]

Porus was a proud Hindu not a forcefully converted sissy like you. He fought till the end the characteristic you clearly lack

How can people with no self respect like you guys who gave in to any marauding invader easily claim a warrior like Porus

Proud hindu when he never called himself one, he was pure follower of Rig Vedic religion not ganga shanga bs.

 

[Peshwa]

How when both Chanakya and Maurya were actually punjabis just like rig vedic people who ruled bhaiyas in jungles of Bihar.

Ok...I think its time for your meds...

Porus is called an Indian king in Greek sources.

Indian as in Indian subcontinent...

To be honest, one cannot claim the exact "regional" demography that we hold true in the scenario of modern nation states....

For eg. Guru Gobind Singh was born in Bihar, but preached in present day Punjab and most Sikhs consider him Punjabi....
In my opinion there were massive migrations of populations and mixing, so even if Porus ruled Punjab, it cannot be determined whether he was Punjabi in the modern sense of the word...

 

[LURKER]

No offence but what sucess and power? Small country like Pakistan always give middle fimger to your kin.



Lol

Now chanakya was born in South India hahahah

Koi hal nai bc tumari nasal ka, no self respect. Maurya was just a name, jungli aborginal with maurya surname in bihar does not mean anything. I hope you are intelligent enough to understand that?

Give me the source for Chanakya's birth not your fake insecure laughter. Chanakya was a Hindu Brahmin, never knew Pakistanis had so much love for Hindus . Maurya is a khsatriya caste not just a name I thought you were better than that

 

[Foot12]

Actually if anything, the Porus would rather associate himself with the militarily successful "midget" bhaiyyas than the present day population of your said country which has done nothing in history but rolled over in the face of invasion...

Most people like to be associated with success and power...you wont understand the concept of success...maybe change nationalities to get a taste..

Well, modern Pakistan never established its own Dynasties in the past as it was mostly under foreign rule during ancient
and medieval period. It was the Maurya Dynasty from eastern India that liberated Pakistan from Greek rule and it was the
Gupta Dynasty from eastern India that liberated Pakistan from Scythian rule. But I wonder why neither the Pratihara Dynasty
nor the Rashtrakuta Dynasty made any effort to liberate Pakistan from the Arab rule.

 

[LURKER]

Proud hindu when he never called himself one, he was pure follower of Rig Vedic religion not ganga shanga bs.

People living east of Indus and having Indic culture were called Hindus untill some cowards cave into to their new masters and got Arabized

 

[terro]

Look at Pakistanis trying to claim Chandragupta Maurya hahaha have some self respect

 

[Peshwa]

Proud hindu when he never called himself one, he was pure follower of Rig Vedic religion not ganga shanga bs.

What were you his concubine that you know what Porus called himself as such??? You're talking as if Porus himself whispered this sweet nothing of a secret in your ear...

Delusions Galore!!

Also, the religion he followed may have been Hinduism (probably not modern hindusim but some precursor of it) most probably (cannot be definitive) as Buddism was promoted mainly after the reign of the Mauryas....

 

[Kabira]

Ok...I think its time for your meds...



Indian as in Indian subcontinent...

To be honest, one cannot claim the exact "regional" demography that we hold true in the scenario of modern nation states....

For eg. Guru Gobind Singh was born in Bihar, but preached in present day Punjab and most Sikhs consider him Punjabi....
In my opinion there were massive migrations of populations and mixing, so even if Porus ruled Punjab, it cannot be determined whether he was Punjabi in the modern sense of the word...

Guru Gobind Singh was punjabi khatri, how the **** he was Bihari lol I will give you a hint, Imran Khan is punjabi or pashtun? He may have been born in Punjab but he is 100% racially pashtun. And khatris even now in India don't mix with anyone.

Forgot about Imran Khan since he does not speak pashto. Abdali was born in Multan, does it make him punjabi?

You guys are hilarious.

 

[Marwat Khan Lodhi]

bactria in those times included khyber region and suleiman mountains, which was mostly inhabited by khatri tribes and others similar to hindkowans of today. at any rate, what this have to do with proving alexander's victory? Porus controlled his own kingdom when alexander was on his deathbed- Fact. does ashoka or any other's writings validate the greek version of events? no, in fact eastern sources and tradition says the opposite.

Khatris? Khyber, sulieman mountains etc were inhabited by pashtuns or proto-pashtuns. Afridi tribe is mentioned by greek historians.
According to alberuni, many afghans/pashtuns were hindus and fought on behalf of jaipal against ghaznavi. It is clear that not all pashtuns have single origin. A portion of them were hindus of dardic origin.
Hindkowans came to peshawer during ranjeet singh times from punjab. Those in hazara, also came from punjab during mughal times. It was policy of mughals to not allow pashtun settlements on east of river indus, hindko districts of hazara lie east of indus.

 

[Peshwa]

Well, modern Pakistan never established its own Dynasties in the past as it was mostly under foreign rule during ancient
and medieval period. It was the Maurya Dynasty from eastern India that liberated Pakistan from Greek rule and it was the
Gupta Dynasty from eastern India that liberated Pakistan from Scythian rule. But I wonder why neither the Pratihara Dynasty
nor the Rashtrakuta Dynasty made any effort to liberate Pakistan from the Arab rule.

Internal Politics and bickering...

Indian kings of the medieval era were too busy fighting each other....
Also, they didnt realize that Islam was an ideological war and not just another western king attacking to expand their kingdom.

 

[Jaggu]

Back then the Biharis were the most powerful people of South Asia. They were advanced in the field of science, military and politics.