What's new

The only South Asians to defeat the Greeks-Mauryas

Status
Not open for further replies.
Don't engage him he is a Professional Troll on PDF only here for derailing the thread.
Says the troll himself.. Take a quick look at your postings.

When did that happened?

The web is there for such things or better ask your darjalingi frnd.
 
speak for yourself brother.

it is common knowledge in the streets of Punjab and Sindh and Kashmir and KPK and Baluchistan. All of Pakistan.

Iskandar e Azam is respected by the awaam

[ Iskander / Sikander is a very common name too ]
 
it is common knowledge in the streets of Punjab and Sindh and Kashmir and KPK and Baluchistan. All of Pakistan.

Iskandar e Azam is respected by the awaam

[ Iskander / Sikander is a very common name too ]

But Porus is one of us, if Alexander had not invaded then Porus would have conquered bhaiyas in jungles.
 
But Porus is one of us, if Alexander had not invaded then Porus would have conquered bhaiyas in jungles.

Ironically for you the bhaiyas from Bihar conquered the martial race :sarcastic:
 
But Porus is one of us, if Alexander had not invaded then Porus would have conquered bhaiyas in jungles.
Really haha joke he was already in allegiance with Nanda empire .
 
But Porus is one of us, if Alexander had not invaded then Porus would have conquered bhaiyas in jungles.

would've, could've, should've.....Porus was an ant compared to the dynasties that actually ruled India...He was simply a king in Punjab or some claim of a himalayan kingdom...

Whether Porus himself would like to be associated with "Pakistan" of today is a debatable subject....so please dont go around putting nationalities on him
 
would've, could've, should've.....Porus was an ant compared to the dynasties that actually ruled India...He was simply a king in Punjab or some claim of a himalayan kingdom...

Whether Porus himself would like to be associated with "Pakistan" of today is a debatable subject....so please dont go around putting nationalities on him

how could mighty Porus relate to midgets bhaiyas? Ruling jungles was hardly any big archivement, punjabi Maurya ruled whole South Asia.
 
would've, could've, should've.....Porus was an ant compared to the dynasties that actually ruled India...He was simply a king in Punjab or some claim of a himalayan kingdom...

Whether Porus himself would like to be associated with "Pakistan" of today is a debatable subject....so please dont go around putting nationalities on him

Porus is called an Indian king in Greek sources.
 
Ironically for you the bhaiyas from Bihar conquered the martial race :sarcastic:

How when both Chanakya and Maurya were actually punjabis just like rig vedic people who ruled bhaiyas in jungles of Bihar.
 
how could mighty Porus relate to midgets bhaiyas? Ruling jungles was hardly any big archivement, punjabi Maurya ruled whole South Asia.

Did the Mauryas moved en masse to Bihar after the partition , where are the punjabi Mauryas today in Pakistan:omghaha:
 
Porus is called an Indian king in Greek sources.

You mean Indoi which came from river Sindh. How its Indian? How can ganga bhaiyas claim anything which does not belong to them but mighty indus? Because you guys have no self respect.
 
how could mighty Porus relate to midgets bhaiyas? Ruling jungles was hardly any big archivement, punjabi Maurya ruled whole South Asia.

Actually if anything, the Porus would rather associate himself with the militarily successful "midget" bhaiyyas than the present day population of your said country which has done nothing in history but rolled over in the face of invasion...

Most people like to be associated with success and power...you wont understand the concept of success...maybe change nationalities to get a taste..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom