karnivore
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2009
- Messages
- 81
- Reaction score
- 0
No, I did not claim, that "Pakistanis are not native to the Indus Valley". But the only argument in favour of Pakistanis, being exclusive descendants of IVC, seems to be the fact, that the ruins of IVC are mostly in Pakistan. The question is not if Pakistanis are direct descendants of IVC, the question is if they are the ONLY descendants.IVC is being claimed on the basis of Pakistanis being native to Indus Valley and the civilisation is part of the Pakistani identity and history.
Very little is known about IVC culture, language or religion, but its ignorant to claim that Buddhism and Hinduism didnt change the culture of Indus Valley people in the same way Islam changed their culture around 8th century AD.
As for Tipu Sultan, nobody claimed he was a Pakistani ancestor.
There is more to Pakistani identity than just 'geographical location'. If you have to make such mindless claims please also explain how Pakistanis are not native to the Indus Valley.
It would appear, that cultural acculturation and hereditary lineage have a magical tendency of stopping abruptly at the boarder of a non-existing political boundary between countries.