The new war epic film is a masterpiece ''The battle at lake Changjin''

[FairAndUnbiased]

You misunderstood what I said. I didn't say CCP prohibits people from touching each other's heart. I certainly didn't say CCP doesn't try to touch people's hearts. What I said is that CCP prohibits people from touching each other's heart IN THEIR OWN WAYS. In China, you can do whatever you like as long as it is sanctioned by CCP. For regular folks living in China, this kind of practice is what they are familiar with for thousands of years. In effect, CCP is practicing feudalism, with high-ranking officials and their families are the new lords and the party secretary being the new emperor. That is why CCP can hold on to its power for a long time and it is important to isolate its people from the rest of the world since feudalism has kind of been out of fashion.

Do you know what feudalism is?

Do you believe in experience through real life?

 

[nang2]

Do you know what feudalism is?

Do you believe in experience through real life?

Feudalism, as it separates from slavery, is a system where labors are restricted in the lands owned by their lords. If you had any experience in real life, particularly the time when government operated all enterprises and farm lands, you would know what it is alike.

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

Feudalism, as it separates from slavery, is a system where labors are restricted in the lands owned by their lords. If you had any experience in real life, particularly the time when government operated all enterprises and farm lands, you would know what it is alike.

You can quit your job in China. This is well documented and proven. Can you quit your job in feudalism?

China has more outbound tourism than any other country so how is it isolated?

 

[nang2]

You can quit your job in China. This is well documented and proven. Can you quit your job in feudalism?

China has more outbound tourism than any other country so how is it isolated?

That is now. Not when CCP was in full swing. Wait until it thinks it has gathered enough strength to fight with capitalism.

As of isolation, you do know that China has the Great Firewall, don't you? Why do you need outbound tourism when you can visit other countries without stepping out your own? Is that how you would encourage Chinese people to know about other countries?

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

That is now. Not when CCP was in full swing. Wait until it thinks it has gathered enough strength to fight with capitalism.

As of isolation, you do know that China has the Great Firewall, don't you? Why do you need outbound tourism when you can visit other countries without stepping out your own? Is that how you would encourage Chinese people to know about other countries?

The opposite did happen though. KMT thought they had the strength to fight with socialism. They lost 99% of their territory and millions of them got killed. Nazi Germany also thought they had the strength to fight with socialism. Hitler shot himself in his own bunker as Soviet Army raised the hammer and sickle on the Reichstag.

Outbound tourism is personal experience. Wow I can't believe you actually think that someone with real life experience is comparable to someone who saw something on the internet. Lmao no wonder you are so detached from reality.

 

[nang2]

The opposite did happen though. KMT thought they had the strength to fight with socialism. They lost 99% of their territory and millions of them got killed. Nazi Germany also thought they had the strength to fight with socialism. Hitler shot himself in his own bunker as Soviet Army raised the hammer and sickle on the Reichstag.

Outbound tourism is personal experience. Wow I can't believe you actually think that someone with real life experience is comparable to someone who saw something on the internet. Lmao no wonder you are so detached from reality.

No outbound tourism can beat outbound migration. Living in a foreign country helps you learn far more than just visiting it. My personal experience is NOT outbound tourism but outbound migration.

I feel sad that Soviet propaganda was so effective that many people today still think Nazism and Fascism are the opposite of Socialism and don't see they are just internal strife of the same faction.

By the way, the strength that defeated KMT was NOT socialism. Letting peasants to own their lands was never a characteristics of socialism. Socialism is against the private ownership of the means of production. That strength was from a clever lie from CCP, which was soon busted when they pushed the people's commune, which took back the ownership of lands.

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

No outbound tourism can beat outbound migration. Living in a foreign country helps you learn far more than just visiting it. My personal experience is NOT outbound tourism but outbound migration.

I feel sad that Soviet propaganda was so effective that many people today still think Nazism and Fascism are the opposite of Socialism and don't see they are just internal strife of the same faction.

By the way, the strength that defeated KMT was NOT socialism. Letting peasants to own their lands was never a characteristics of socialism. Socialism is against the private ownership of the means of production. That strength was from a clever lie from CCP, which was soon busted when they pushed the people's commune, which took back the ownership of lands.

letting peasants farm land without paying rent - as opposed to paying rent on the privately owned land of the landlord as a sharecropper - is indeed socialism. That is why the landlords were executed by the peasants. If the landlords were so beloved, someone would've defended them. You can't do anything of that magnitude without popular support.

actually, Nazis and fascists were voted into power. There are quotes on Wikipedia and Google of Nazis outright saying that they are pro private ownership and love big corporations. So they have nothing to do with socialism.

 

[nang2]

letting peasants farm land without paying rent - as opposed to paying rent on the privately owned land of the landlord as a sharecropper - is indeed socialism. That is why the landlords were executed by the peasants. If the landlords were so beloved, someone would've defended them. You can't do anything of that magnitude without popular support.

actually, Nazis and fascists were voted into power. There are quotes on Wikipedia and Google of Nazis outright saying that they are pro private ownership and love big corporations. So they have nothing to do with socialism.

Landlords were not executed by the peasants. They were executed by CCPs who had guns. Peasants didn't have guns.

You really need to study into what makes nazism and fascism, instead of just following the lines from Soviet. Nazism and Fascism have very similar economic policies. They were born out of the frustration among socialists who saw no realization of Marx's prediction. They gave a token appearance of private ownership of the means of production. But, and this is the key part, all productions were under the directives of the government. When you cannot use your properties in the way you like but following someone's order, are they really your properties? In another word, if someone else decides who can live in your house, is it really your house?

 

[Brainsucker]

You misunderstood what I said. I didn't say CCP prohibits people from touching each other's heart. I certainly didn't say CCP doesn't try to touch people's hearts. What I said is that CCP prohibits people from touching each other's heart IN THEIR OWN WAYS. In China, you can do whatever you like as long as it is sanctioned by CCP. For regular folks living in China, this kind of practice is what they are familiar with for thousands of years. In effect, CCP is practicing feudalism, with high-ranking officials and their families are the new lords and the party secretary being the new emperor. That is why CCP can hold on to its power for a long time and it is important to isolate its people from the rest of the world since feudalism has kind of been out of fashion.

Actually, that's my point. Old fashion idea can't hold tight in today modern world life. Specially when information can be obtained very easy everywhere. Ok, CPC has their internet great wall that prevent their people obtain information from aboard. But what prevent those people from getting VPN, and get new ideas that make them think that neighbor's grass is greener than your own lawn? Even today there are a lot of foreign propaganda that exactly do that, to sway those 1.4 billions people heart. They can always have a forum / social media that prohibited by the government to gather simply by using VPN. Even if VPN is considered as illegal, they can still obtained it easily in the internet, touch each other's heart IN THEIR OWN WAYS without being able to prevented by CPC. And it is not that hard to bring millions people to join, if they really hate CPC. Once they can get enough, what PLA can do to hold them?

Remember, since the ancient time, it is the government that follow the popular demand rather than people follow the government. Roman Emperor Constantine converted to Christianity just because that religion was the most popular idea among his subject. Mongol Princes and Khan embrace Islam in Central Asia just because it is the religion that embraced by the majority of their population. CPC can't hold their seat if they don't follow the trend of Chinese civilization today. Nobody can. If someday the majority of Chinese population demand democracy, CPC can't do anything except change their way in order to survive, and prevent China to become like Syria.

And those 1.4 billions people of China are not stupid. According to data, almost all of them are literates. There are hundred of millions University graduates. Smart people value freedoms more than literates one. They value their own freewill more than ancient people in Imperial China. they're harder to satisfied than those poor peasants in early 20th century. IF CPC still embrace old fashion idea, and strictly hold on that old fashion one, CPC will definitely fall. Even if there are only 200 millions discontent people in China has already can destroy the country. Because PLA can't stand against a massive rebellion of that extend.

So the only way for CPC to hold their power is by following the trend, and let their people satisfied. They can plan any crazy ideas but, if those ideas are unpopular, it will cause discontent among the population. And believe me, that is very dangerous for some kind of authoritarian Government. With democracy, when people discontent with the government, they can choose other choice and prevent a bloodshed. But with a single authoritarian government, when people are discontent, then they're doomed. Because the only choice that those people have is bloody revolution.

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

Landlords were not executed by the peasants. They were executed by CCPs who had guns. Peasants didn't have guns.

You really need to study into what makes nazism and fascism, instead of just following the lines from Soviet. Nazism and Fascism have very similar economic policies. They were born out of the frustration among socialists who saw no realization of Marx's prediction. They gave a token appearance of private ownership of the means of production. But, and this is the key part, all productions were under the directives of the government. When you cannot use your properties in the way you like but following someone's order, are they really your properties? In another word, if someone else decides who can live in your house, is it really your house?

No, they were lynched once tyrannical police and army didn't protect them anymore. They weren't just shot, they were hanged and beaten in public anger.

US historians even admit that the Nazis were capitalist and US sources have those quotes, so you're going against US historical consensus? If they were socialist as you claim why do they care about even lip service to private ownership which is seen as obsolete and to be replaced by public ownership?

 

[GiantPanda]

That is now. Not when CCP was in full swing. Wait until it thinks it has gathered enough strength to fight with capitalism.

As of isolation, you do know that China has the Great Firewall, don't you? Why do you need outbound tourism when you can visit other countries without stepping out your own? Is that how you would encourage Chinese people to know about other countries?

Dumbest thing I have ever heard. Visiting some place virtually on a computer is better than going there? You sound like some Indian nitpicking because China has the world largest outbound tourist AND outbound student populations AND the world's trading regime which forces China to interact with customers around the globe.

Unlike the USSR and North Korea, millions of Chinese have traveled the world, traded with practically every nation and spent years being educated around the world.

Seriously, you simply can't be the world's largest trading nation if you're isolated.

 

[Leishangthem]

Another space where Chinese lacks in comparion to US is big corporate owned multimedia news networks aimed at global audience setting their own narrative globally.
The VOA,RFA which are state-owned by the US gov is nowhere near as effective or wide spanning as the CNN,CNBC,FOX .
You can hardly find one well funded international news outlet from china which isn't tagged "chinese state funded media" except for SCMP,which is originally a H K media .
State media of any nation tends to be too regimented,uninspiring & constricted. China needs their own army of corporate backed news and other media outlets ,which are more in sync with public. I wonder if alibaba opened a news network,will it still be labeled "chinese state funded"? .The independent corporate owned media will be more creative and inspiring than state owned media,the corporate media can chart their own course,they can improve their content quality and they be more ingenious and innovative if global expansion and profit was their goal instead of waiting for state funds .

 

[Titanium100]

Another space where Chinese lacks in comparion to US is big corporate owned multimedia news networks aimed at global audience setting their own narrative globally.
The VOA,RFA which are state-owned by the US gov is nowhere near as effective or wide spanning as the CNN,CNBC,FOX .
You can hardly find one well funded international news outlet from china which isn't tagged "chinese state funded media" except for SCMP,which is originally a H K media .
State media of any nation tends to be too regimented,uninspiring & constricted. China needs their own army of corporate backed news and other media outlets ,which are more in sync with public. I wonder if alibaba opened a news network,will it still be labeled "chinese state funded"? .The independent corporate owned media will be more creative and inspiring than state owned media,the corporate media can chart their own course,they can improve their content quality and they be more ingenious and innovative if global expansion and profit was their goal instead of waiting for state funds .

Media will come easily but first focus should be on undoing the Dollar and changing it with new world currency and countries will change from keeping their money or assets in western banks by default. Sanction policy will die forever.

The digital Yuan has best chance of replacing the dollar and it is slowly campaigning itself to replace it with little campaign here and there and some patience the Dollars value will wane in the coming 2 decades by late 2030s and early 2040s the target is for the whole world being users of Digital Yuan as the world currency. For this two decades you slowly inject the DY into the markets and it grows slowly replacing Dollar because China has already most manufacturing and exports it only makes it easier for them to slowly but surely start taking payments on DY

 

[silverox]

M has a special killing target. He said that 5% of the people are hidden enemies. Therefore, the whole country has designated enemies for this killing target, and many people have been killed. M is the Qin Shihuang of modern society, and M himself likes to be called Qin Shihuang. Qin Shihuang was a famous tyrant in Chinese history.

 

[Battlion25]

‘Battle At Lake Changjin’ Is China’s All-Time Highest-Grossing Film

‘Battle At Lake Changjin’ Is China’s All-Time Highest-Grossing Film

Directed by Chinese filmmaking heavyweights Dante Lam, Chen Kaige and Tsui Hark, the war epic stormed to an all-time box office high of $892 million. However, the state-backed film is embroiled in controversy, with a ban in Malaysia and international criticism over its historical inaccuracies.

www.forbes.com