What's new

The myth of the hidden hand

Solomon2

BANNED
Joined
Dec 12, 2008
Messages
19,475
Reaction score
-37
Country
United States
Location
United States
logo.gif

The myth of the hidden hand

By Arif Rafiq Published: June 13, 2013
562508-ArifRafiqNew-1371065688-857-640x480.JPG
The writer is an adjunct scholar at the Middle East Institute in Washington, DC and president of Vizier Consulting, LLC. He tweets at @arifcrafiq.
I had my eyes on the paan. The distinct sweetness of that betel leaf wrap, I knew, would take me back to Pakistan, albeit for a few fleeting moments.

Meanwhile, the cashier had his eyes on me. A short conversation ensued. And it, too, took me back to Pakistan. But the flavour was bitter sorrow.

With formal introductions out of the way, the cashier and I began to talk of Pakistan’s present troubles. It was a melancholy conversation I’ve had many times before with others here in the US — a conversation that will be familiar to many expatriate Pakistanis and persons of Pakistani origin.

The sequence begins with expressions of horror at what Pakistan has become. Next come explanations of how it came to be this way, followed by lamenting the loss of what was or what might have been. And finally, there are indelicate attempts to punctuate the conversation with optimism or a supplication. The exchange is a formulaic, rapid fire form of collective therapy, probably common to many diaspora members from conflict-struck countries. It is a way to cope with disaster from a distance.

The cashier — an exceedingly polite, clean-shaven man with salt and pepper hair — said to me: “They cannot be Muslims. The people who are doing all this, they cannot be Muslims. Does anyone in your family do things like this? Blowing up masjids? No. And neither does anyone in mine.”

I stood there — keema in one hand, paan in the other — as he presented to me a narrative that has become an indelible part of the Pakistani intellectual diet. This is the narrative of the hidden hand — the third force that is supposedly pitting Muslim against Muslim in Pakistan.

I spoke with the man, but I do not know him personally. I do not know why he, as an individual, has subscribed to this myth. I will not pretend that I know why. But I did pretend to agree with him. He was both a stranger and an elder. I came into his store. And I came as a customer, not as a professional who analyses militancy in South Asia. It wasn’t my place to rebut him and I couldn’t change his mind in the few minutes I had.

Ultimately, it is only honesty from Pakistan’s leadership that can weaken the hold of this narrative of the hidden hand. Truth-telling must start at the top. It must come from Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif.

On terrorism, Sharif has been an enigma. In the past five years, he has been refreshingly honest about Pakistan-based militants who target Afghanistan and India. Yet, he has avoided direct condemnation of militant groups behind the murder of thousands of Pakistanis.

The establishment, too, has had a binary approach towards militant groups. The army is quite focused on targeting al Qaeda and the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), while it has had a weaker approach toward other groups — for obvious reasons. Still, the establishment rarely mentions al Qaeda and the TTP specifically when speaking to the Pakistani public.

The citizens of Pakistan deserve the honest truth from their leadership. They should be told that most of the violence that takes place in Pakistan is not done by hands that are hidden. The hands are, in fact, visible, soaked in Pakistani blood and waving with pride. The TTP have claimed responsibility for the murder of thousands of Pakistanis. They do so by phone, email and videos published on the internet.

Denial, it could be said, is a river that runs through Pakistan. But it has not yet overflowed. The least Sharif could do is call these killers by their names. When the hidden hand myth meets its death — when more Pakistanis realise that the terrorists are fellow Pakistanis aiming to take over the state and impose their ideology on 180 million people — then we might see sustained public support for a national security policy that results in more Pakistanis living.

Published in The Express Tribune, June 13th, 2013.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
But we can't handle the truth! Now what?

...when more Pakistanis realise that the terrorists are fellow Pakistanis aiming to take over the state and impose their ideology on 180 million people — then we might see sustained public support for a national security policy that results in more Pakistanis living.
The author believes if Pakistanis can't handle the truth they must accept a death rate from terrorism greater than they would have if they could handle the truth.

That's the price of hubris and cowardice, imo. The first time I saw Pakistanis suffer from this conundrum was in 1971. The solution was for the East to break away and the West to experience martial law and forgetfulness. But these have proven, time and again, to be only temporary solutions. If you really want to fix things that are messed up in your country, you have to work to change its values.
 
The author believes if Pakistanis can't handle the truth they must accept a death rate from terrorism greater than they would have if they could handle the truth................

If you really want to fix things that are messed up in your country, you have to work to change its values.
...............

Look at the 60,000 lives lost over the last few years with such forbearance, and you can clearly see just how accepting we are of the higher death rate. In addition, if this high rate continues, I can see us carrying on with nary a shrug, being perfectly comfortable with the values that we have, and therefore the way things are in the country.
 
I can see us carrying on with nary a shrug, being perfectly comfortable with the values that we have, and therefore the way things are in the country.
Well, if you aren't willing to work for change, why should other Pakistanis do so?
 
There is so much analysis of death and terrorism in pakistan, what if it magically stops after 2014, US withdrawl from afganistan. :cheers:
 
logo.gif

The myth of the hidden hand

By Arif Rafiq Published: June 13, 2013
562508-ArifRafiqNew-1371065688-857-640x480.JPG
The writer is an adjunct scholar at the Middle East Institute in Washington, DC and president of Vizier Consulting, LLC. He tweets at @arifcrafiq.
I had my eyes on the paan. The distinct sweetness of that betel leaf wrap, I knew, would take me back to Pakistan, albeit for a few fleeting moments.

Meanwhile, the cashier had his eyes on me. A short conversation ensued. And it, too, took me back to Pakistan. But the flavour was bitter sorrow.

With formal introductions out of the way, the cashier and I began to talk of Pakistan’s present troubles. It was a melancholy conversation I’ve had many times before with others here in the US — a conversation that will be familiar to many expatriate Pakistanis and persons of Pakistani origin.

The sequence begins with expressions of horror at what Pakistan has become. Next come explanations of how it came to be this way, followed by lamenting the loss of what was or what might have been. And finally, there are indelicate attempts to punctuate the conversation with optimism or a supplication. The exchange is a formulaic, rapid fire form of collective therapy, probably common to many diaspora members from conflict-struck countries. It is a way to cope with disaster from a distance.

The cashier — an exceedingly polite, clean-shaven man with salt and pepper hair — said to me: “They cannot be Muslims. The people who are doing all this, they cannot be Muslims. Does anyone in your family do things like this? Blowing up masjids? No. And neither does anyone in mine.”

I stood there — keema in one hand, paan in the other — as he presented to me a narrative that has become an indelible part of the Pakistani intellectual diet. This is the narrative of the hidden hand — the third force that is supposedly pitting Muslim against Muslim in Pakistan.

I spoke with the man, but I do not know him personally. I do not know why he, as an individual, has subscribed to this myth. I will not pretend that I know why. But I did pretend to agree with him. He was both a stranger and an elder. I came into his store. And I came as a customer, not as a professional who analyses militancy in South Asia. It wasn’t my place to rebut him and I couldn’t change his mind in the few minutes I had.

Ultimately, it is only honesty from Pakistan’s leadership that can weaken the hold of this narrative of the hidden hand. Truth-telling must start at the top. It must come from Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif.

On terrorism, Sharif has been an enigma. In the past five years, he has been refreshingly honest about Pakistan-based militants who target Afghanistan and India. Yet, he has avoided direct condemnation of militant groups behind the murder of thousands of Pakistanis.

The establishment, too, has had a binary approach towards militant groups. The army is quite focused on targeting al Qaeda and the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), while it has had a weaker approach toward other groups — for obvious reasons. Still, the establishment rarely mentions al Qaeda and the TTP specifically when speaking to the Pakistani public.

The citizens of Pakistan deserve the honest truth from their leadership. They should be told that most of the violence that takes place in Pakistan is not done by hands that are hidden. The hands are, in fact, visible, soaked in Pakistani blood and waving with pride. The TTP have claimed responsibility for the murder of thousands of Pakistanis. They do so by phone, email and videos published on the internet.

Denial, it could be said, is a river that runs through Pakistan. But it has not yet overflowed. The least Sharif could do is call these killers by their names. When the hidden hand myth meets its death — when more Pakistanis realise that the terrorists are fellow Pakistanis aiming to take over the state and impose their ideology on 180 million people — then we might see sustained public support for a national security policy that results in more Pakistanis living.

Published in The Express Tribune, June 13th, 2013.

here comes another piece off **** by a newspaper full off **** and full off USA paid writers so nothing new same old crap by ET
 
Last edited by a moderator:
here comes another piece off **** by a newspaper full off **** and full off USA paid writers so nothing new same old crap by ET
what according to you sir should be done to stop blood bath there?
 
Well, if you aren't willing to work for change, why should other Pakistanis do so?

Well Sir, to be honest, if you haven't noticed already, in reality Pakistanis really do not want any substantive changes. Whether I am willing to work for it, or not, becomes irrelevant given the situation.
 
how will that stop terror, it will only make fat people fatter.. :)

I meant official fee not private commission.. which you are probably already paying.

All terrorists need weapon and all weapon pas through Pakistan air space and land.... terrorist needs petrol and all petrol goes from Pakistan.

By blocking every thing we cut the supply lines and we have done it in past for few months.. which lead to stop in terrorism.

I'm just proposing repeat of same for 5 years and see the results.
 
I meant official fee not private commission.. which you are probably already paying.

All terrorists need weapon and all weapon pas through Pakistan air space and land.... terrorist needs petrol and all petrol goes from Pakistan.

By blocking every thing we cut the supply lines and we have done it in past for few months.. which lead to stop in terrorism.

I'm just proposing repeat of same for 5 years and see the results.
terrorists do not get weapon or money through a supply line, the weapons are smuggled sometimes, and in some cases available to everybody.
You need to stop terror finance to stop petrol , nobody sends petrol to terrorists. :)
 
terrorists do not get weapon or money through a supply line, the weapons are smuggled sometimes, and in some cases available to everybody.
You need to stop terror finance to stop petrol , nobody sends petrol to terrorists. :)

WHo is missing record of his finances in Afghanistan is only US, who is consuming most of petrol of Pakistan, in Afghanistan is India. if blocklage of supply lines does not mean blockage of weapons and explosives than .. we both have different understanding of supply lines, whereas my version is based on experience.. which i witnessed after salala attacks.

One other way is to supply Pakistan with drones and attack 5 squadrons of attack hellis.

This will also help to kill terrorists faster than there production..
 
WHo is missing record of his finances in Afghanistan is only US, who is consuming most of petrol of Pakistan, in Afghanistan is India. if blocklage of supply lines does not mean blockage of weapons and explosives than .. we both have different understanding of supply lines, whereas my version is based on experience.. which i witnessed after salala attacks.

you seriously think blocade to supply line after salala decrease terror attack? any stats to prove it?
 
Back
Top Bottom