The Muslim Blackmail

[Politico]

I will ask Ms. Long Legs if i interest where she is from.

Our definition of Farang and Angrez is deeply misunderstood by you.

Angrez angrezi bolte hain or Farang jo alag dikhte ho.

Anyhow whiteys or lets say British for your indulgence, invaded every country except Mongolia and one or two others. On their part it cannot be ignorance but pure racism. Most of the colonised peoples only interaction has been very limited but Europeans have pillaged in these parts for hundreds of years now.

You see thats where I swim against the current. Maybe your Indian husband has rubbed in this subjugation in you my lady. You still have 30 days.

Am I not evil?



Do you know how many countries favored the invasion of Iraq?
Back then they were Iraqis and now they are Muslims? Iraq was in your neighbours pockets when it was 'invaded' or more like invited by the people themselves. A civil war broke out.

Crusades are a thousand year old. No historical evidence can prove those numbers and even if it did. Muslims killed more and rightly so.

Hitler caused World War 2. The biggest loss of human life. First use of Nuclear Bomb.

World War 1. Muslims could have easily been neutral. They poked their nose in matters that matter nothing to do them. We lost the Caliphate.

Do you write a Muslim Arab or an Arab Muslim? A Persian Muslim or Muslim Persian?

And we have yet to reach the concept of Nation States.

So stop sugarcoating your Lust for Lavish Life as some Renaissance of Muslim World.

Brit whiteys cannot be blamed for their ignorance due to the fact that their forefathers ruled the world and not them. Average Brit whitey hasn't passed further than Spain for an out of country holiday. The education system here pays little or no attention to the days of colonialism focusing more on the Battle of Hastings than the glory days of the empire thus giving the average Anglo-Saxon that feel good psyche of being a victim at the hands of that damn Norman-French king William who slaughtered Harold and his men. My Indian husband subjugated? He hails from a well known Indian family who are featured regularly in financial articles employing scores of people including in the UK. He would be the last person who would have any feeling of subjugation (save when he is with me and I am dishing out orders to him). Only part about him which I find despicable is his innate hatred for Pakistan. My dad and him could spend hours discussing what a failure Pakistan is and how glorious their "homeland" India is. Drives my poor Pakistani mother crazy and I have to figuratively hold the "Ummah" together in my house

 

[El Sidd]

Brit whiteys cannot be blamed for their ignorance due to the fact that their forefathers ruled the world and not them. Average Brit whitey hasn't passed further than Spain for an out of country holiday. The education system here pays little or no attention to the days of colonialism focusing more on the Battle of Hastings than the glory days of the empire thus giving the average Anglo-Saxon that feel good psyche of being a victim at the hands of that damn Norman-French king William who slaughtered Harold and his men. My Indian husband subjugated? He hails from a well known Indian family who are featured regularly in financial articles employing scores of people including in the UK. He would be the last person who would have any feeling of subjugation (save when he is with me and I am dishing out orders to him). Only part about him which I find despicable is his innate hatred for Pakistan. My dad and him could spend hours discussing what a failure Pakistan is and how glorious their "homeland" India is. Drives my poor Pakistani mother crazy and I have to figuratively hold the "Ummah" together in my house

Well Mahabharata is an eventuality i guess.

And poor brits. Now with Brexit they even isolated themselves further.

No Wonder its known for its fascist movements

 

[Solomon2]

Your avatar is insulting to me.

Why is that?

 

[Politico]

Well Mahabharata is an eventuality i guess.

And poor brits. Now with Brexit they even isolated themselves further.

No Wonder its known for its fascist movements

Only fascist movement in Britishstan is the government

 

[El Sidd]

Only fascist movement in Britishstan is the government

All governments are fascist.

Why is that?

Pakistan does not recongize Israel and you waving kissing flags at me

 

[Solomon2]

Pakistan does not recongize Israel and you waving kissing flags at me

Not an insult but a worthy goal to aspire to. So what if that disagrees with the current position of your government? They made a bad choice decades ago but never admit to any fault that makes them look bad. Demanding that Pakistanis unquestioningly adhere to and advocate this rejectionist attitude for decades reduces Pakistanis from citizens free to debate government policy to mere servants of the government's will, don't you agree?

 

[El Sidd]

Not an insult but a worthy goal to aspire to. So what if that disagrees with the current position of your government? They made a bad choice decades ago but never admit to any fault that makes them look bad. Demanding that Pakistanis unquestioningly adhere to and advocate this rejectionist attitude for decades reduces Pakistanis from citizens free to debate government policy to mere servants of the government's will, don't you agree?

The state of Pakistan made that decision not a government

 

[Solomon2]

The state of Pakistan made that decision not a government

"...We have been anti-Israel in Pakistan because of Palestine, because the Pakistani people are on the side of the Palestinians and are concerned for their plight. Right from the beginning, from when we got our independence in '47 and Israel came into reality a year later, we have been pro-Palestine.

"But I believe in realism and in assessing ground realities. I think it's necessary to understand the changing environment, analyze it - and respond. A lot has happened since '48, and one has to adjust. Policies are made, yes, but when the environment changes, policies should change. Policies should not remain constant.

"Israel is a fait accompli. A lot of the Muslim world have understood that and I know many Muslim countries have relations with Israel, whether above board or covertly. So this is the change in reality I am talking about. Pakistan has to keep demanding the resolution of the Palestinian dispute ... [but] Pakistan also needs to keep readjusting its diplomatic stand toward Israel based on the mere fact that it exists and is not going away...

"There is always risk in any new initiative. You can never be sure [what the reaction will be]. But a leader who is not prepared to take risks is not a leader. I believe that leaders should generally flow with public opinion. But there are times and issues where the public opinion goes astray, or is anchored in wrong premises - and to change that is the leader's job. That's where real leadership emerges. Changing the public's opinion is part of leadership. Leadership is not standing at the head of a herd and carrying out things you feel are wrong..."

- former Pakistan president Pervez Musharraf, January 6, 2012 link

 

[El Sidd]

"...We have been anti-Israel in Pakistan because of Palestine, because the Pakistani people are on the side of the Palestinians and are concerned for their plight. Right from the beginning, from when we got our independence in '47 and Israel came into reality a year later, we have been pro-Palestine.

"But I believe in realism and in assessing ground realities. I think it's necessary to understand the changing environment, analyze it - and respond. A lot has happened since '48, and one has to adjust. Policies are made, yes, but when the environment changes, policies should change. Policies should not remain constant.

"Israel is a fait accompli. A lot of the Muslim world have understood that and I know many Muslim countries have relations with Israel, whether above board or covertly. So this is the change in reality I am talking about. Pakistan has to keep demanding the resolution of the Palestinian dispute ... [but] Pakistan also needs to keep readjusting its diplomatic stand toward Israel based on the mere fact that it exists and is not going away...

"There is always risk in any new initiative. You can never be sure [what the reaction will be]. But a leader who is not prepared to take risks is not a leader. I believe that leaders should generally flow with public opinion. But there are times and issues where the public opinion goes astray, or is anchored in wrong premises - and to change that is the leader's job. That's where real leadership emerges. Changing the public's opinion is part of leadership. Leadership is not standing at the head of a herd and carrying out things you feel are wrong..."

- former Pakistan president Pervez Musharraf, January 6, 2012 link

He was a dictator and not representative of Peoples opinion nor consensus.

Give me a Prime Minister of Pakistan and we can begin to Talk and even before that change that repulsive Avatar.

This should be banned. Like the Swatiska

 

[Solomon2]

He was a dictator and not representative of Peoples opinion nor consensus.

Mushy was a dictator, yes, but consensus is not representative democracy; rather, consensus will function as a brake preventing elected representatives from taking difficult but realistic decisions that defy majority opinion.

Give me a Prime Minister of Pakistan and we can begin -

You're the one who gets to vote for one, not I.

This should be banned. Like the Swatiska

If you insist on intolerance why should "your" PM risk changing policy?

 

[El Sidd]

Mushy was a dictator, yes, but consensus is not representative democracy; rather, consensus will function as a brake preventing elected representatives from taking difficult but realistic decisions that defy majority opinion.

You're the one who gets to vote for one, not I.

If you insist on intolerance why should "your" PM risk changing policy?

The policy needs No changing anytime soon.

If you can find a political leader who has the balls to Pull it off. Be my guest.

Countries do not recongize countries all the Time. Why is Israel so special? Armenians never cry that we dont recongize them.

Kosovo actually complained on Pakistans late Reaction.

Realistically and statistically we dont need to recongize Israel.

You are seeking unwanted attention with that abomination of courtesy protocol.

 

[Solomon2]

The policy needs No changing anytime soon...Realistically and statistically we dont need to recongize Israel

Really? The anti-Israel policy is based on lies and corruption, not justice. Do you think Pakistan needs more of that?

...All the major parties today stand accused of corruption, lies and manipulation of the electoral system and if the media is to be believed, there is a lot of truth in these accusations. Their only public discourse is attacking each other in derogatory terms. Democracy cannot survive in such a situation which can only be salvaged by the emergence of a young and new leadership that rejects this culture of opportunism and sees the wisdom of negotiation and consensus without which reform and change cannot even be initiated. But where will this young leadership come from and where and how will it be groomed?​

What greater challenge to the culture of lies and manipulation can there be than to stand with Israel? That assertion would carry its own credibility, yes? What greater stand of honesty, what greater invitation to electorate scrutiny and effort to change, could there be than that?

If you can find a political leader who has the balls to Pull it off. Be my guest.

Why not you?

You are seeking unwanted attention with that abomination of courtesy protocol.

"Unwanted"? By whom?

 

[El Sidd]

Really? The anti-Israel policy is based on lies and corruption, not justice. Do you think Pakistan needs more of that?

...All the major parties today stand accused of corruption, lies and manipulation of the electoral system and if the media is to be believed, there is a lot of truth in these accusations. Their only public discourse is attacking each other in derogatory terms. Democracy cannot survive in such a situation which can only be salvaged by the emergence of a young and new leadership that rejects this culture of opportunism and sees the wisdom of negotiation and consensus without which reform and change cannot even be initiated. But where will this young leadership come from and where and how will it be groomed?​

What greater challenge to the culture of lies and manipulation can there be than to stand with Israel? That assertion would carry its own credibility, yes? What greater stand of honesty, what greater invitation to electorate scrutiny and effort to change, could there be than that?

Why not you?

"Unwanted"? By whom?

Unwanted by me.
You can put the moon in my one Hand and the Sun in the other. And if you Imagine i have more hands put Venus mars and Jupiter for good measure, i would Not.

We have ideological differences with the state of Israel and Thats why justice says in my books that we dont have to recongize you. Israels claim to statehood is the Manifestation of corruption.

Peace with Israel is on the condition that we dont recongize you. This way both pose each other No existential threat. You change that. You fulfill a prophecy in the minds of Pakistanis already on Ghazwa juice.

Solomon you are purposely unwise.

 

[Solomon2]

Unwanted by me.

Not your avatar.
Not yet, anyway.

We have ideological differences with the state of Israel and Thats why justice says in my books that we dont have to recongize you. Israels claim to statehood is the Manifestation of corruption.

Really? 'cause all the evidence is that it is resistance to Israel's claim to statehood that is a manifestation of corruption; the other stance reduces to mere name-calling, unsupported by facts in context.

Peace with Israel is on the condition that we dont recongize you.

This is about Pakistan's and Pakistanis' needs, not Israel's.

 

[El Sidd]

Not your avatar.
Not yet, anyway.

Really? 'cause all the evidence is that it is resistance to Israel's claim to statehood that is a manifestation of corruption; the other stance reduces to mere name-calling, unsupported by facts in context.

This is about Pakistan's and Pakistanis' needs, not Israel's.

A) Pakistan dont need Israel. And israel knows.

B) the claim of a jewish state is a corruption of the jewish Faith itself if most religious jews live outside of it.

C) My Avatar keeps changing