What's new

The most powerful military nations 2015

Sweden should still be above the Swiss though. Switzerland doesn't even have a Navy As a Navy guy I can't support that.

These guys don't count:mad:!!!

Merchant Marine of Switzerland - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You did not read what I had posted, did you??? :pissed:
It clearly says , no landlocked nation will be penalised for NOT having an navy. :P :bunny:.

@xenon54
you did not read the opening line of the thread and also did not visit the site given.Did you? :) But do read this

upload_2015-2-4_0-8-13.png
 
.
You did not read what I had posted, did you??? :pissed:
It clearly says , no landlocked nation will be penalised for NOT having an navy. :P :bunny:.

@xenon54
you did not read the opening line of the thread and also did not visit the site given.Did you? :) But do read this

View attachment 189846

No, no, I read it and have visited Global Firepower before. I just never miss an opportunity to poke fun at another nation's lack of a navy. Forget the rankings for a minute, the criteria, the analysis:

Sweden > Switzerland.

I penalize a land-locked nation for not having a Navy. As an ex-Navy guy, I can't support this blatant lack of water access. Where I'm from that's grounds for "democracy", come to think of it, most everything is grounds for that.

:p:
 
.
you did not read the opening line of the thread and also did not visit the site given.Did you? :) But do read this
The 4th sentence alone shows how inaccurate they are regarding Saudi, only category they lack is Navy in that list, but thats just my opinion.
 
.
Saudi has very strong weapons, their military would be strong even if their soldiers were total noobs which probably isnt even considered in the list anyway.
moral and the will to fight are more important than weapons
 
. .
this is not accurate Ranking ..KSA is cant 25th ... they got fighter planes better than Indians ..
Indian military , Airforce and Navy is using out dated weapon system compared to other Nato countries , but just because of other stuff , does make them powerful Military ...
and there is always a advantage to have Nuclear weapons over non Nuclear one's if you are putting the scenario in a war ..
 
. . .
this is not accurate Ranking ..KSA is cant 25th ... they got fighter planes better than Indians ..
Indian military , Airforce and Navy is using out dated weapon system compared to other Nato countries , but just because of other stuff , does make them powerful Military ...
and there is always a advantage to have Nuclear weapons over non Nuclear one's if you are putting the scenario in a war ..
Only those dont have the capability to win a conventional war resort to nuclear weapons. And nuclear weapons 're used for deterring an enemy. And the site clearly says that ranking doesnt depend on NUMBER of weapons, but also its use.
You guys 're too lazy to read instructions. :P Lolzz
 
.
.
Switzerland has a population about 8 million but bunker capacity for over 10 million, till a couple years ago every house had to have a nuclear bunker in basement, beat that. :P

Switzerland’s bizarre nuclear bunker law | The Casual Truth

Sweden's got those too!!! Well, maybe not in every basement:cry:, but we have enough space for all our people.

bahnhof-data-center-isp-in-former-nuclear-bunker-from-cold-war-stockholm-sweden-2.jpg


bahnhof-data-center-isp-in-former-nuclear-bunker-from-cold-war-stockholm-sweden-5.jpg


bahnhof-data-center-isp-in-former-nuclear-bunker-from-cold-war-stockholm-sweden-6.jpg


bahnhof-data-center-isp-in-former-nuclear-bunker-from-cold-war-stockholm-sweden-12.jpg


bahnhof-data-center-isp-in-former-nuclear-bunker-from-cold-war-stockholm-sweden-13.jpg


Ok, maybe it's a bit less than a nuclear bunker now, but that's what it was and Sweden is dotted with these. Our entire population can live underground too. Switzerland isn't the only European nation worried about the crazy Russians. In-fact, all European nations have these types of bunkers.

The Data Center Inside a Cold War Nuclear Bunker «TwistedSifter
 
Last edited:
. . .
Only those dont have the capability to win a conventional war resort to nuclear weapons. And nuclear weapons 're used for deterring an enemy. And the site clearly says that ranking doesnt depend on NUMBER of weapons, but also its use.
You guys 're too lazy to read instructions. :P Lolzz

so you are telling me that USA has no capability ???? :o:
 
. .

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom