Fawadqasim1
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2017
- Messages
- 4,242
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
1. You're mistaken about the Shaheen-1A 'testbed' & 'deployed' versions. Its actually the other way around; the 'testbed' version (with the red-painted cone) is the one actually deployed. And the 'deployed' one (with camouflaged cone) was the testbed (though for different purposes), it was only tested once.
2. When it comes to solid fuel motors, other advancements besides the changes in length have taken place. Shaheen-3 has the same dia as Shaheen-2, but payload reduction & first stage length extension weren't the only reasons for the increase in range by upto 90%.
3. Wrong about the Agni series, both A1 & A2 deploy the same warhead. The RVs sure are a bit different though. Also, A1 uses the first stage of A2. Similarly, A4 & A5 share the same warhead. Again the RVs have slightly different cone shapes. Also A5 is built upon A3 (same dia motors). So please, do not underestimate people who are miles ahead in terms of technology development.[/QU
sir when is pakistan moving from 1.4m dia to 2m dia
sir when is pakistan moving from 1.4m dia to 2m dia1. You're mistaken about the Shaheen-1A 'testbed' & 'deployed' versions. Its actually the other way around; the 'testbed' version (with the red-painted cone) is the one actually deployed. And the 'deployed' one (with camouflaged cone) was the testbed (though for different purposes), it was only tested once.
2. When it comes to solid fuel motors, other advancements besides the changes in length have taken place. Shaheen-3 has the same dia as Shaheen-2, but payload reduction & first stage length extension weren't the only reasons for the increase in range by upto 90%.
3. Wrong about the Agni series, both A1 & A2 deploy the same warhead. The RVs sure are a bit different though. Also, A1 uses the first stage of A2. Similarly, A4 & A5 share the same warhead. Again the RVs have slightly different cone shapes. Also A5 is built upon A3 (same dia motors). So please, do not underestimate people who are miles ahead in terms of technology development.