What's new

The Future of China’s Amphibious Assault Fleet,the power of china's navy

.
China and Russia all have silicon processors. US is declining and losing market share over the years.


double yawn
You are comparing 1940s Japan to 2020 China with nukes with bigger industrial capacity. Japan lost because they didn't have the population nor industrial capacity.

China has no first use policy for nukes. your industrial capacity is no good when it is reduced to rubble
 
.
. . .
I'm talking truth. Biologically engineered weapon is far more deadly than nuclear weapon.
And first think that you 50 year old Tu-16 based H-6 can penetrate US defense system and USN in the pacific they intercept you at long ranges, if you fire your long range cruise missiles equipped by biological warheads US may consider it is nuclear attack from China on US main land , and you know very well what will be the consequences of this stupid move by China, nuclear retaliation form USA on China, it was not that easy that you thinks
 
.
And first think that you 50 year old Tu-16 based H-6 can penetrate US defense system and USN in the pacific they intercept you at long ranges, if you fire your long range cruise missiles equipped by biological warheads US may consider it is nuclear attack from China on US main land , and you know very well what will be the consequences of this stupid move by China, nuclear retaliation form USA on China, it was not that easy that you thinks

H-6K carries CJ-10 range 4000 km. It is difficult to intercept. One missile carrying COVID warhead would kill millions in the US within 1 year of impact. This is true because China also bombs Pfizer and Moderna vaccine labs. So the moral of the story is. Do not mess with China. You can't win.

 
Last edited:
.
don't
H-6K carries CJ-10 range 4000 km. It is difficult to intercept. One missile carrying COVID warhead would kill millions in the US within 1 year of impact. This is true because China also bombs Pfizer and Moderna vaccine labs. China is willing to sacrifice billions if US acts aggression against China. So the moral of the story is. Do not mess with China. You can't win.

don't be stupid these slow moving cruise missiles can be intercept USN in MID pacific by RAM/ improve sea sparrow
 
. . .
troll why you want to kill millions in the US, and US will stay silence after that attack???

China can use Russian airspace and launch missiles across the Arctic to attack the US through Canada. Only 5000 km or so. US wants to fight China? Let's see how many Americans are wiling to die.
 
.
China can use Russian airspace and launch missiles across the Arctic to attack the US through Canada. Only 5000 km or so. US wants to fight China? Let's see how many Americans are wiling to die.
Whether its launch for artic or anywhere most of them will being intercepted, and Russia won't allow to use their airspace to fire on USA, and same goes to China how many Chinese are willing to die
 
.
Whether its launch for artic or anywhere most of them will being intercepted, and Russia won't allow to use their airspace to fire on USA, and same goes to China how many Chinese are willing to die

Russia and China are strategic allies. If US attacks China then China uses Russian airspace to launch cruise missiles at US across Arctic and Canada. Only 4000 km distance. You can't intercept all of them. Hell, even 1 Exocet hit a Type 42 destroyer. Only 1 COVID warhead cruise missile kills millions in the US over a 1 year period.

 
.
Russia and China are strategic allies. If US attacks China then China uses Russian airspace to launch cruise missiles at US across Arctic and Canada. Only 5000 km distance.
Whether you're strategic allies or not Russian will not allow China to fire from their airspace on USA, Russian is not stupid to jump in other war between China and USA, and you're derailing you own thread stick to the topic you fart
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom