Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And if you think the Indians are foolish to do something in a way Pakistan can catch then with the hand in the cookie jar, think again.
Not necessarily accepted. An attack on Indian civilian centers is an escalation by itself & no country can allow the "enemy" to decide on the level of escalation allowed.
A decent argument but still one that does not cut much ice. The Pakistani state is responsible for controlling its territory & any attacks directed from within its boundaries will be its responsibility to deal with & stop. the areas being spoken of are not the bad lands of tribal areas but Punjab & Pakistan administered Kashmir. The IWT exists between the Pakistani & Indian states, an abrogation is justifiable because of actions or inaction of the Pakistani state. If the people of Pakistan wish to see their state do more, they should act accordingly. After all Pakistan is a democracy, is it not? Let the people put pressure on the state to do more against the perpetrators of attacks against India. A precedence for such action already exists with villages close to the LoC in Pakistani administered Kashmir coming out on the streets protesting against any militant movement in their area since they believe that it would bring with it, Indian retaliation through shelling.
Isn't the whole premise that India would declare suspension of IWT and river closures as a retaliation for a terrorist attack? The Indian action would be open and pre-declared, so there is nothing for Pakistan to 'catch'.
Your Victorian English aside, was your father an Englishman, Joe?
"Social Standing"?
Khoda khair karay.
"blue-eyed boy," lol....haven't heard that in forever...you musta lived in the US for some time.It was India who escalated Siachen. Nothing happened. And that was when you were the blue eyed boy of the Yanks with the Soviet war and we were the basket cases with our famed hindu rate of growth. Now its not like that. The potential audience for a pakistani sob story is much limited now.
And if you think the Indians are foolish to do something in a way Pakistan can catch then with the hand in the cookie jar, think again.
The policy of shooting first and thinking later has been a patented Pakistani policy till now.
Isn't the whole premise that India would declare suspension of IWT and river closures as a retaliation for a terrorist attack? The Indian action would be open and pre-declared, so there is nothing for Pakistan to 'catch'.
Ironically, this is the same argument used to justify 9/11.
Just a sincere word in your ear.
Don't start something you can't finish.
"blue-eyed boy," lol....haven't heard that in forever...you musta lived in the US for some time.
If not, we are waiting. And watching.
For the holes in the stretched fabric to render and get bigger.
Till either the whole unravels.
Or there is a hole large enough for us to get through before you can close it off.
Once we are inside, within a major city of yours, there is no way you are going to go nuclear.
From there it is a honorable armistice.
And a special protectorate status.
As an independent sovereign nation.
"blue-eyed boy," lol....haven't heard that in forever...you musta lived in the US for some time.
I'm well aware of the meaning...we used it in the Army all the time..."the Captain's blue-eyed boy"We use it all the time man. Especially in corporate parlance.
Usually refers to the boss's suck-up.
I think I have hurt Joe Shearer's feelings.
Out of anyone else, he should realize that a jest is a jest.
So I would like to apologize to Mr. Shearer if he found any of my posts obscenely offensive.
Sorry Sir.
Although you are an Indian, You are still my senior.
A-ha, we knew that "nice" guy will out..........