The course India has chosen will lead to its own destruction - DG ISPR

[blueazure]

superb analysis of the current india situation as covered by VICE

 

[PradoTLC]

Lol. Not really. You are just saying for the sake of saying. Because our civilian and military leadership has been pretty bold than we could ever be on PDF.

bold??

Yes!

Stupid??

That too!

 

[blueazure]

dude your views are myopic and limited to what RSS/bhakts want you to believe.

"Most of the Indians support CAA" - I am sure these most of the "Indians" are not just living in RSS nagpur office. Go to North East and see how many Indians are supporting CAA. Dont just gallop everything you are told at the RSS sakhas

who are the unfit, pot bellied old men in brown chaddis and white shirts , making the nazi salute in the above post video ?

why are they marching all over india with batons ?

 

[Protest_again]

dude your views are myopic and limited to what RSS/bhakts want you to believe.

"Most of the Indians support CAA" - I am sure these most of the "Indians" are not just living in RSS nagpur office. Go to North East and see how many Indians are supporting CAA. Dont just gallop everything you are told at the RSS sakhas

Buddy, North East is tiny part of the country in terms of population. And I am from South. I stand by my comment 'silent majority support the bill'.
I wish we had parliamentary elections this year, to dispel your doubts.

The reason for Assam's opposition to the bill is not the same as the mainland opposition/political protests. Also, my main contention is that the law is passed, if it survives the judicial review, then no body can do anything about it. Doesn't matter whether majority support it or not.

 

[Lasit Borphukan]

Buddy, North East is tiny part of the country in terms of population. And I am from South. I stand by my comment 'silent majority support the bill'.
I wish we had parliamentary elections this year, to dispel your doubts.

The reason for Assam's opposition to the bill is not the same as the mainland opposition/political protests. Also, my main contention is that the law is passed, if it survives the judicial review, then no body can do anything about it. Doesn't matter whether majority support it or not.

I am an assamese but I am not against the bill for the same reason as other people in NE. The bill deliberately ignores a section of the society and hence the opposition. Most the the Indians are doing it for the same reason.

As far as silent support is concerned, not more than 20% of the Indians are supporting it

 

[Protest_again]

I am an assamese but I am not against the bill for the same reason as other people in NE. The bill deliberately ignores a section of the society and hence the opposition. Most the the Indians are doing it for the same reason.

As far as silent support is concerned, not more than 20% of the Indians are supporting it

Ignoring section of society? I repeat Indian muslims are not affected by this bill at all. They are not refugees in this state, they are citizens. This bill only affects only illegal aliens. We chose to give citizenship to the minorities of these three countries because majority made their bed and slept on it since 1947. Are you a kid?

20% support? How do you know? You cannot bring about laws in isolation, there is always a context. India has its history with these neighboring countries as they chose to divide the country on basis of religion. Also this bill is based on religious persecution, how do you suppose you say muslims are persecuting other muslims. And what if muslims are included (even though it's a oxymoron), there are still 500 million muslims left in those countries. Would you also want them to have opportunity at Indian citizenship by just illegally crossing? You may be magnanimous but most Indians are not. Liberal ideas are good but they shouldn't be detrimental to oneself.

 

[Great Janjua]

India is secular not a super hindu state... if religious persecution is the criteria than why not the Hazaras or Amhediays from Pakistan or Rohingiays from Myanmar should qualify ?

Hazaras are perfectly fine move on boy worry about the protest in your country

 

[Lasit Borphukan]

India is secular not a super hindu state... if religious persecution is the criteria than why not the Hazaras or Amhediays from Pakistan or Rohingiays from Myanmar should qualify ?

20% .. this is how -
135 Cr Indians > 90 Cr eligible for voting > 60 Cr voted in 2019 (67%) > 22 Cr voted for BJP and its allies (2019)

 

[Protest_again]

India is secular not a super hindu state... if religious persecution is the criteria than why not the Hazaras or Amhediays from Pakistan or Rohingiays from Myanmar should qualify ?

Seriously? Rohingyas? Myanmar is not included in those three countries. Also Myanmar is not historically subcontinent to include them. Next you'll ask why not Syrians?

Hazaras or Ahmediyas are still muslims per Indian constitution. Whether other muslims (in those countries) consider them to be muslims or not is not our concern. It is internal to their country/religion there. Ahmediyas fought for separate Pakistan at the time of independence. Please understand the historical context before commenting on the subject.

20% .. this is how -
135 Cr Indians > 90 Cr eligible for voting > 60 Cr voted in 2019 (67%) > 22 Cr voted for BJP and its allies (2019)

Lol. You are not only poor on logic but also math it seems. How is (22cr out of 60 cr) 20%? Man, you are brain washed by libtards. Go and read, improve your overall knowledge on the subject.

 

[Lasit Borphukan]

Seriously? Myanmar is not included in those three countries. Also Myanmar is not historically subcontinent to include them. Hazaras or Ahmediyas are still muslims per Indian constitution. Whether other muslims (in those countries) consider them to be muslims or not is not our concern. It is internal to their religion. Ahmediyas fought for separate Pakistan at the time of independence. Please understand the historical context before commenting on the subject.

Myanmar aka Burma was part of British India from 1826 to 1930s and they are our neighbor.. When was Afghanistan part of undivided India ?

 

[Great Janjua]

Seriously? Myanmar is not included in those three countries. Also Myanmar is not historically subcontinent to include them. Hazaras or Ahmediyas are still muslims per Indian constitution. Whether other muslims (in those countries) consider them to be muslims or not is not our concern. It is internal to their religion. Ahmediyas fought for separate Pakistan at the time of independence. Please understand the historical context before commenting on the subject.

Hazaras are Muslim who said they are not same cannot be said about the other community though

 

[SIPRA]

Hazaras are Muslim who said they are not same cannot be said about the other community though

Bhai: Yeh dau Gangu aik doosray ki baja rahay haen. Bajaanay dau.

 

[Protest_again]

Myanmar aka Burma was part of British India from 1826 to 1930s and they are our neighbor.. When was Afghanistan part of undivided India ?

Are you kidding me? Read up history buddy. Afghanistan was always in Indian cultural zone. From emperor Ashoka to Mughals all had control over Afghanistan. That is for 1700 years. Only British didn't come through that route. Even British had control there for a few decades.

Also it is about statistics. How many minorities do you suppose left in Afghanistan? What about Myanmar? Your argument is really dumb. Please stop.

 

[Great Janjua]

Bhai: Yeh dau Gangu aik doosray ki baja rahay haen. Bajaanay dau.[emoji38]

[emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]

 

[Mentee]

As soon as that radical Christian leader blows the horn on Iran, paakis must break all hell loose on the rss nazi regime. Proportionality will take us to our graves, throw every single bullet at them while trumpians our preoccupied with Iran. Otherwise our hands gonna always be tied.

@MastanKhan @Mangus Ortus Novem

Bhai: Yeh dau Gangu aik doosray ki baja rahay haen. Bajaanay dau.

Phr na he langiay