Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The bald thief in London is not innocent. We don't need compromised journalists to tell us they made a mistake and who cares if they did? Was he a judge?
The judges ruled correctly since Ganja never showed proof how he bought the apartments in London. He has looted Pakistan many times and even got an NRO from Musharraf and started looting again with a fresh slate.
Yeah! missed the cool dudes !!What about the neutral generals?
I will not write too much here, will let the listeners make their own judgement.
maryam's media cell can take a break...not sure how an out of context clip absolves anyone of corruption of billions....I will not write too much here, will let the listeners make their own judgement.
I will not write too much here, will let the listeners make their own judgement.
For all those basing their opinions on the twitter clip, please watch the video attached. Mati did a cut and paste job and it does not capture Moeed’s opinions.
The point that Peerzada is making, and I agree with him, is that the judiciary has always been suspicious and functions to protect elite capture. They are not actually interested in curbing corruption- which is not an issue for them.
Moeed makes the point that the JIT wrote 10 volumes, 1000 pages of hard evidence against NS and in the end, the SC knew that Nawaz had no money trail (for they asked for it numerous times), and yet they disqualified him on the job he had in Dubai. And then referred his case to NAB to make the judgement. The judge there, that we now know was meeting NS, and was getting blackmailed by him, passes a judgment finding him guilty on the case for which there was less evidence and letting him go on the case where there was more evidence against NS. And then he gets exposed by the video for meeting with NS and then he releases his statement on blackmail and then he suspiciously falls dead.
As they say, something is wrong in the state of Denmark. Additionally, the point that the judiciary is shady, is in no way to reduce the argument that NS and his brother, PML-N leaders, are guilty as hell.
That is without a shadow of a doubt. But the judiciary seemed to have set aside hard evidence against NS when it wanted to. That’s the bullshit in this.
I suspect it is.This is your intellectual capacity that you were so easily mislead?