What's new

The CIA Network Inside Pakistan

no intelligence agency would knowingly employ agents working for other country's interest. CIA, being a premier intellgence agency in the world is intelligent enough to know this fact? looks like the author of this article is super intelligent to find this out before anyone else could! maybe ISI should offer this guya a honorary membership in their club!

See the article posted earlier - the US source quoted in it claims himself that the CIA was/is recruiting locals for intelligence gathering purposes.

---------- Post added at 01:18 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:18 PM ----------

UK has issued 30,000 + Visas to Asians in the last 10 years alone. And remember, UK is much smaller when compared to Pakistan. Issuing Visas is not the only issue. Intelligence system do not take care of immigration/border scrutiny and control in any country, however, they have to work together.
:cheers:
It is not just about 'issuing visa's' to any random individual coming in for business or tourism, but the fact that Pakistan is involved in a war, and these 'visa's allow US officials to travel across Pakistan to supposedly 'monitor' the various 'projects' the US is funding.

I opined about this several months ago, that the reason the US does not want to invest in large projects in Pakistan is because dozens of smaller projects allow it to have a much larger footprint across Pakistan for the same amount of money invested.
 
ya true...and its always soo cool to counter analyze them... specially i am a pakistani...i am from an army back ground...i think its naturally in my blood to dive deep about pakistani secret encypted system that has been inplaced in a whole new way after nine eleven :)

by the way, any one heard about HUAWAE crypotography installations in islo??

If you are well versed to be asking about that, do you know about the Chinese/Pak FriendShip Centre and why it's always locked ;)
 
A Question
How come US helicopters took off from Kabul and traveled to Abbottabad and made back without refueling.
A. Is there a CIA base inside Pakistan where they landed and refueled or they went to the Embassy in Islamabad to refuel.
B. did they came from Indian side or escape from the Indian side.

Can there heli be refuel in the air, then there must be refueler in Pakistani air too
 
If you are well versed to be asking about that, do you know about the Chinese/Pak FriendShip Centre and why it's always locked ;)

Offcoarse the cyptography servers wont be in pak - china friendship complex. i think it will be inside the ISI bulding , or some where in the ISI premises in G5, F5 sector :) or may be diplomatic enclave :)
 
A Question
How come US helicopters took off from Kabul and traveled to Abbottabad and made back without refueling.
A. Is there a CIA base inside Pakistan where they landed and refueled or they went to the Embassy in Islamabad to refuel.
B. did they came from Indian side or escape from the Indian side.

Can there heli be refuel in the air, then there must be refueler in Pakistani air too

thats why we say they flew from tarbela :),

comapre this with
5690385023
this
5690387135
 
A Question
How come US helicopters took off from Kabul and traveled to Abbottabad and made back without refueling.
A. Is there a CIA base inside Pakistan where they landed and refueled or they went to the Embassy in Islamabad to refuel.
B. did they came from Indian side or escape from the Indian side.

Can there heli be refuel in the air, then there must be refueler in Pakistani air too


The UH-60 can be equipped with stub wings at top of fuselage to carry fuel tanks or various armaments. The initial stub wing system is called External Stores Support System (ESSS).It has two pylons on each wing to carry two 230 US gal (870 L) and two 450 US gal (1,700 L) tanks in total.

The four fuel tanks and associated lines and valves form the external extended range fuel system (ERFS).


Wiki
 
Pakistan's got to be the most deluded insecure country on the face of this earth. We have failed ourselves but we won't shun the state of denial :disagree:

people,Stop deluding yourself with shameless conspiracy theories!

so why dont you leave pakistan and become part of some successful state??, india??
 
CIA network successfully established in Pakistan by their slaves aka ISI it wasn't possible for them butwe made it possible for them we are very good slaves please don't criticize us or our intelligence agency they were only doing their job and they are paid to do so so please stop pretending as if you don't know and stop presenting lane excuses now the ppl of Pakistan have realized that they are being fooled by their own agencies
 
I dnt think CIA would make such a big mistake by not taking ISI onboard..

Former Assistant Sec. of State for 3 US presidents says top general admitted 9/11 was a false flag
Posted on Pakalert on May 9, 2011 // 2 Comments [Translate]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Wednesday, May 4, 2011

Top US government insider Dr. Steve R. Pieczenik, a man who held numerous different influential positions under three different Presidents and still works with the Defense Department, shockingly told The Alex Jones Show yesterday that Osama Bin Laden died in 2001 and that he was prepared to testify in front of a grand jury how a top general told him directly that 9/11 was a false flag inside job.

Pieczenik cannot be dismissed as a “conspiracy theorist”. He served as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under three different administrations, Nixon, Ford and Carter, while also working under Reagan and Bush senior, and still works as a consultant for the Department of Defense. A former US Navy Captain, Pieczenik achieved two prestigious Harry C. Solomon Awards at the Harvard Medical School as he simultaneously completed a PhD at MIT.

Recruited by Lawrence Eagleburger as Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Management, Pieczenik went on to develop, “the basic tenets for psychological warfare, counter terrorism, strategy and tactics for transcultural negotiations for the US State Department, military and intelligence communities and other agencies of the US Government,” while also developing foundational strategies for hostage rescue that were later employed around the world.

Pieczenik also served as a senior policy planner under Secretaries Henry Kissinger, Cyrus Vance, George Schultz and James Baker and worked on George W. Bush’s election campaign against Al Gore. His record underscores the fact that he is one of the most deeply connected men in intelligence circles over the past three decades plus.

The character of Jack Ryan, who appears in many Tom Clancy novels and was also played by Harrison Ford in the popular 1992 movie Patriot Games, is also based on Steve Pieczenik.

Back in April 2002, over nine years ago, Pieczenik told the Alex Jones Show that Bin Laden had already been “dead for months,” and that the government was waiting for the most politically expedient time to roll out his corpse. Pieczenik would be in a position to know, having personally met Bin Laden and worked with him during the proxy war against the Soviets in Afghanistan back in the early 80′s.

Pieczenik said that Osama Bin Laden died in 2001, “Not because special forces had killed him, but because as a physician I had known that the CIA physicians had treated him and it was on the intelligence roster that he had marfan syndrome,” adding that the US government knew Bin Laden was dead before they invaded Afghanistan.

Marfan syndrome is a degenerative genetic disease for which there is no permanent cure. The illness severely shortens the life span of the sufferer.

“He died of marfan syndrome, Bush junior knew about it, the intelligence community knew about it,” said Pieczenik, noting how CIA physicians had visited Bin Laden in July 2001 at the American Hospital in Dubai.

“He was already very sick from marfan syndrome and he was already dying, so nobody had to kill him,” added Pieczenik, stating that Bin Laden died shortly after 9/11 in his Tora Bora cave complex.

“Did the intelligence community or the CIA doctor up this situation, the answer is yes, categorically yes,” said Pieczenik, referring to Sunday’s claim that Bin Laden was killed at his compound in Pakistan, adding, “This whole scenario where you see a bunch of people sitting there looking at a screen and they look as if they’re intense, that’s nonsense,” referring to the images released by the White House which claim to show Biden, Obama and Hillary Clinton watching the operation to kill Bin Laden live on a television screen.

“It’s a total make-up, make believe, we’re in an American theater of the absurd….why are we doing this again….nine years ago this man was already dead….why does the government repeatedly have to lie to the American people,” asked Pieczenik.

“Osama Bin Laden was totally dead, so there’s no way they could have attacked or confronted or killed Osama Bin laden,” said Pieczenik, joking that the only way it could have happened was if special forces had attacked a mortuary.


Pieczenik said that the decision to launch the hoax now was made because Obama had reached a low with plummeting approval ratings and the fact that the birther issue was blowing up in his face.

“He had to prove that he was more than American….he had to be aggressive,” said Pieczenik, adding that the farce was also a way of isolating Pakistan as a retaliation for intense opposition to the Predator drone program, which has killed hundreds of Pakistanis.

“This is orchestrated, I mean when you have people sitting around and watching a sitcom, basically the operations center of the White House, and you have a president coming out almost zombie-like telling you they just killed Osama Bin Laden who was already dead nine years ago,” said Pieczenik, calling the episode, “the greatest falsehood I’ve ever heard, I mean it was absurd.”

Dismissing the government’s account of the assassination of Bin Laden as a “sick joke” on the American people, Pieczenik said, “They are so desperate to make Obama viable, to negate the fact that he may not have been born here, any questions about his background, any irregularities about his background, to make him look assertive….to re-elect this president so the American public can be duped once again.”

Pieczenik’s assertion that Bin Laden died almost ten years ago is echoed by numerous intelligence professionalsas well as heads of state across the world.

Bin Laden, “Was used in the same way that 9/11 was used to mobilize the emotions and feelings of the American people in order to go to a war that had to be justified through a narrative that Bush junior created and Cheney created about the world of terrorism,” stated Pieczenik.

During his interview with the Alex Jones Show yesterday, Pieczenik also asserted he was directly told by a prominent general that 9/11 was a stand down and a false flag operation, and that he is prepared to go to a grand jury to reveal the general’s name.

“They ran the attacks,” said Pieczenik, naming Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Stephen Hadley, Elliott Abrams, and Condoleezza Rice amongst others as having been directly involved.

“It was called a stand down, a false flag operation in order to mobilize the American public under false pretenses….it was told to me even by the general on the staff of Wolfowitz – I will go in front of a federal committee and swear on perjury who the name was of the individual so that we can break it open,” said Pieczenik, adding that he was “furious” and “knew it had happened”.

“I taught stand down and false flag operations at the national war college, I’ve taught it with all my operatives so I knew exactly what was done to the American public,” he added.

Pieczenik re-iterated that he was perfectly willing to reveal the name of the general who told him 9/11 was an inside job in a federal court, “so that we can unravel this thing legally, not with the stupid 9/11 Commission that was absurd.”

Pieczenik explained that he was not a liberal, a conservative or a tea party member, merely an American who is deeply concerned about the direction in which his country is heading.
 
Webster Tarpley an american historian states '....Bin Laden Reality TV a Mass Brainwashing PsyOp Seeking to Establish Fake Treasure Trove of Terabytes that will be Used to Target US Adversaries Worldwide; Growing Momentum Towards False Flag Attack to be Blamed on Pakistan via al Qaeda..'
 
CIA network successfully established in Pakistan by their slaves aka ISI it wasn't possible for them butwe made it possible for them we are very good slaves please don't criticize us or our intelligence agency they were only doing their job and they are paid to do so so please stop pretending as if you don't know and stop presenting lane excuses now the ppl of Pakistan have realized that they are being fooled by their own agencies

I dont think so............read below what US press is saying:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tony Cartalucci, Land Destroyer Report
May 5, 2011
The immediate reaction by most across the world upon hearing of “Bin Laden’s” death was that America now had the excuse it needed, real or not, to gracefully depart from its disastrous “War on Terror.” However, the architects behind America’s foreign military adventures over the past several decades have already begun clamoring about the need to not only expand their global war, but to implicate Pakistan as being complicit in harboring the mythological “Bin Laden.”
An Offer Pakistan “Can’t Refuse”
Brookings Institution, and in particular, the policy wonks that penned the treasonous, extralegal, extraterritorial “Which Path to Persia?” report, are busy handing Pakistan “an offer it can’t refuse” on the heels of this obvious hoax. One such wonk, Michael E. O’Hanlon of Brookings recently wrote, “U.S.-Pakistan: Bad Union, No Divorce” where he outlines a series of “incentives” to coax Pakistan back down the road of serving America’s regional interests. Somehow, free-trade deals, the promise of reduced drone attacks, and more unsolicited aid is supposed to convince Pakistan to acquiesce to American demands in the wake of this recent, intentional frame up of their populous South Asian country.
Citing the cartoonish “bin laden” hoax, where the long-dead elusive CIA asset has now been “killed” down the street from Pakistan’s military academy, Pakistan is expected to acquiesce to numerous demands and concessions from the US. Such demands being placed upon Pakistan, according to O’Hanlon, involve scaling back Pakistan’s nuclear program, reducing Pakistan’s unilateral relations with neighboring Afghanistan, and of course America’s continued free reign within Pakistani territory itself. In other words, the complete relinquishing of Pakistan’s national sovereignty to a foreign power in exchange for less brutality, less engineered destabilization, and diminished economic independence.

US Insistence that Pakistan’s Concerns are “Paranoia”
Fellow “Which Path to Persia?” author Bruce Riedel of Brookings weighs in with his piece, “Pakistan Plays Hardball” published in Newsweek. Concerning is the level of intellectual dishonesty Riedel laces this piece with, as he convinces readers that Pakistan’s paranoia toward American interests in the region is unwarranted.
Brookings’ Bruce Riedel calls Pakistan “paranoid” even as fellow policy wonks openly call for the carving up of the country – in particular the “liberation” of the Baluchi region (in pink).
Riedel might want to revisit his work in “Which Path to Persia?” to see where this very warranted suspicion comes from, as the report openly recommends the use of foreign-funded revolutions, armed insurrections, and military coups in tandem to force concessions or even regime change in target nations. Similar calls have been made specifically in regards to carving up Pakistan. Riedel for his part, seems to suggest toward the end of his piece that once again, manipulating Pakistan’s political scene would be the best method to rein in an increasingly defiant Pakistan.
Enter China
Fellow corporate-financier policy wonk Selig Harrison of the Soros-funded Center for International Policy, openly called for the carving up of Pakistan in two reports earlier this year. He explicitly calls to “aid the 6 million Baluch insurgents fighting for independence from Pakistan in the face of growing ISI repression.” This further justifies Pakistan’s growing suspicion and defiance while it undermines Western accusations of unwarranted paranoia.
Harrison specifically mentions China’s growing influence in Pakistan and how it is undermining America’s interests throughout the region. Coupled with O’Hanlon’s belief that a similar scenario is playing out in Afghanistan where Kabul is slowly slipping out from under US influence with Pakistan’s help, brings to light the deterioration of the West’s regional agenda. This signifies not just a failure in Afghanistan and Pakistan, but an overall, irreversible failure to contain China as part of the “String of Pearls” strategy.
Such a failure becoming apparent might be a good reason why the West has decided to “find” Bin Laden all the sudden in the heart of Pakistan’s military and intelligence community. An anonymous opinion piece in the Boston Globe calls for the extortion of Pakistan in light of this “revelation.” Immediately recognizing the unfolding implications, China rushed to Islamabad’s defense. China has called for support from the international community for Pakistan and stated, “China also suffers from terrorism. Some terrorist forces are engaged in a great many violent, terrorist activities for the purpose of splitting China, and seriously threaten China’s national security, and regional peace and security.”
China did not state specifically who these “terrorist forces” were, but these comments – indeed this entire confrontation between the United States, Pakistan, and China – comes just weeks after China openly accused the West of interfering in its internal affairs. After an attempted color revolution feeding off the current US-funded “Arab Spring,” an April 2011 Reuters report, “China crackdown driven by fears of a broad conspiracy,” stated that “Chinese leaders believe domestic foes, their foreign backers and Western governments are scheming to undermine and ultimately topple the Communist Party. Recent speeches and articles from security officials echo with warnings of subversive plots backed by Western “anti-China” forces.”
A map from the SSI report “String of Pearls” regarding the containment of China. Pakistan is included, along with Bangladesh, Myanmar, Thailand, Vietnam and the South China Sea. The worst case-scenarios discussed regarding China’s containment are now playing out.
The evidence is overwhelming that the current “Arab Spring,” the subsequent foreign-funded revolutions simmering in Eastern Europe and Southeast Asia, and now the recent row with Pakistan are targeting Moscow and Beijing directly. The threat of destabilization is meant to force concessions, create tension within target nations, and eventually effect regime change favorable towards the goal of Western military and economic hegemony. This is explicitly expressed in Brookings’ “Which Path to Persia?” report in regards to Iran and the Middle East, and is reiterated in the Strategic Studies Institute’s report “String of Pearls: Meeting the Challenge of China’s Rising Power across the Asian Littoral.”
Conclusion
What will most likely unfold next is a series of attempts to leverage concessions from Pakistan, further isolate nationalist elements, and reestablish control over Pakistan and Afghanistan. China, Pakistan, and the corporate-owned Western media all seem to agree that an attempt to create political upheaval, including a color revolution-style campaign against Islamabad is imminent. Coupled with plans openly articulated by the Center for International Policy to arm separatist insurgents in Pakistan’s Baluchistan region, and consistent attempts to drive a wedge between the government and the ISI, we see all the necessary ingredients for a “Which Path to Persia?” style intervention in Pakistan.
While the West insists war with Pakistan is untenable, one would have thought framing Pakistan with one of the most ridiculous hoaxes in recent history – claiming to find Bin Laden on the doorstep of Pakistan’s military academy – was equally untenable. With notorious globalist rags like the Economist attempting to tell us that the collapsing dollar is merely an adjustment between trade imbalances, and as America continues to hit impasses both politically and stragetically with a growing number of nations, we are confronted with an unprecedented psychosis across Western leadership, the corporate-owned media, and the general public itself.
There is no resolution for the West’s decline as long as those that have brought it upon us remain firmly in control. Likewise we must be vigilant against pretenders and false reformers, especially out of the military-industrial complex – for example, life-long globalist servants like General David Petraeus who might attempt to “save us” from our “flawed civilian leadership.”
We must commit ourselves as individuals and as local communities to the restoration of the US Constitution at a local level, seize back individual and local sovereignty, and reject entirely the proven failure that is globalization. The stronger the central United States government seems to become, the more precarious America’s existence as a sovereign and free nation is. While deciphering the intentions and designs of our “leadership” is difficult and finding voices at a national level we can trust nearly impossible, we can easily discern on a local level whether we are moving towards or away from freedom and independence. It is important to stay informed globally, but more important to become active locally.
 
Pakistan's got to be the most deluded insecure country on the face of this earth. We have failed ourselves but we won't shun the state of denial :disagree:

people,Stop deluding yourself with shameless conspiracy theories!

These are not conspiracy theories. There is a war on for world resources and especially for curtailing those resources to China. Look at the bigger picture.
 
Absolutely correct ................there is a war against China in which Pakistan is a pawn
 
Pakistan's got to be the most deluded insecure country on the face of this earth. We have failed ourselves but we won't shun the state of denial :disagree:

people,Stop deluding yourself with shameless conspiracy theories!

These are not conpiracy theories there is a geo political game on for world resources. Look at the bigger picture.
 
Back
Top Bottom