What's new

The CIA is a Terrorist Organization

Is it related to this set of incidents ?

Nope, much older, but during 2000 CNN has made bias campaign discrediting Muslim fighters who fought at that 2000 conficts and some said US under Bush sent Aircraft Carrier to water near Maluku but not dare to intervene directly.

The only clash with US was in Bawean, around early 2000, where 2 Indonesian F 16 has dog fight with some US F 18 near Bawean island, Indonesia, where their AC sailed there, but no missiles launched.
 
Only dumbasses accusses US is behind isis. If it's not for the US, isis is now in Basra and Damascus already.

The amount of money, weapons, airstrikes poured by the USA alone was unmatched by any anti isis coalition combined.

When Marawi was attacked by isis southeast asian wing, the US sends ammo, drones, as well as smart bombs to fight back, the chinese on the other hand only supplied simple assault rifles and they make a PR stunt out of it.

You're living in a fantasy world. America wanted regime change in Syria and Libya, so they are the ones to gain the most by spawning terrorist groups that cause mass murder and tyranny.

It was Russia, not america that saved Damascus and that is a documented FACT!!!

You ought to go back to school and put some real effort to studying history. Instead of ranting away like a brainwashed parrot.
 
You're living in a fantasy world. America wanted regime change in Syria and Libya, so they are the ones to gain the most by spawning terrorist groups that cause mass murder and tyranny.

It was Russia, not america that saved Damascus and that is a documented FACT!!!

You ought to go back to school and put some real effort to studying history. Instead of ranting away like a brainwashed parrot.
Are you sure it's not because Syria and Iran are run by despotic dictators for decades now??? not because of the cruelty that the Syrian regime shows against women and children in the first place??
it's not because Syria, despite a majority Sunni country are ruled byAlawi rulers ??

is it not the USA that saved Kobani from isis in the first place, isn't it the US who broke the back of isis in Baiji, Ramadi, Jurf al Shakr?? is there any major victories scored by the Syrian govt??? the answer is no, your so called Syrian Arab army are busy deserting their positions.

what were your Iranian, Russian ,Syrian armies doing when Jabhat Nusra and it's Salafist allies were busy destroying SAA left and right?? the thing is your just taking credit of what US airower had achieved and shamelessly accuse US of funding isis.

lmao.
 
Are you sure it's not because Syria and Iran are run by despotic dictators for decades now??? not because of the cruelty that the Syrian regime shows against women and children in the first place??
it's not because Syria, despite a majority Sunni country are ruled byAlawi rulers ??

is it not the USA that saved Kobani from isis in the first place, isn't it the US who broke the back of isis in Baiji, Ramadi, Jurf al Shakr?? is there any major victories scored by the Syrian govt??? the answer is no, your so called Syrian Arab army are busy deserting their positions.

what were your Iranian, Russian ,Syrian armies doing when Jabhat Nusra and it's Salafist allies were busy destroying SAA left and right?? the thing is your just taking credit of what US airower had achieved and shamelessly accuse US of funding isis.

lmao.
Spewing US propaganda as usual. ISIS started to lose heavily when Trump took over and stop weapon supply to "moderate rebels". It was US policy of arming Syrian rebel that allowed ISIS to flourish. It was Russian who air bombed ISIS position first, not the US(the US came much much later). Your lies can easily fool people who don't follow the war closely. The US initially blamed "Syria" for arming the rebels, turns out they were the one arming.

Go read operation TImber Sycamore, canceled by Trump.
 
Last edited:
Are you sure it's not because Syria and Iran are run by despotic dictators for decades now??? not because of the cruelty that the Syrian regime shows against women and children in the first place??

Those two sentences show that you have internalized the lies that NATO and GCC said about Syria.

"Killing civilians including women and children" is what NATO said about Libya and Syria in the UNSC during making the case for intervention.

The US initial blamed "Syria" for arming the rebels

I remember that some Turkish members of PDF were faithfully saying the same.
 
Spewing US propaganda as usual. ISIS started to lose heavily when Trump took over and stop weapon supply to "moderate rebels". It was US policy of arming Syrian rebel that allowed ISIS to flourish. It was Russian who air bombed ISIS position first, not the US(the US came much much later). Your lies can easily fool people who don't follow the war closely. The US initially blamed "Syria" for arming the rebels, turns out they were the one arming.

Go read operation TImber Sycamore, declassified by Trump.
ughhh, isis setback starts when the battle of Kobani in 2014 began, isis lost a significant amount of men and material trying to capture and hold the city against the kurds. followed by battle of tall brak, Russian airstrike begin somewhere late 2015, almost a full year late, there were no Russian airstrike in Kobane, Baiji, Ramadi, Jurf al shakr, Tikrit.

even when isis is already badly battered by US airpower ,the Syrian as well as their Iranian and Russian allies shows their usual incompetence by losing Palmyra twice, and got beaten back as far as Al-Qaryatayn.

Syrian as well as Iraqi troops are actually the biggest suppliers of arms for isis as they often left huge amount of arms behind to be captured by isis.
"Killing civilians including women and children" is what NATO said about Libya and Syria in the UNSC during making the case for intervention.
it's the truth.
 
ughhh, isis setback starts when the battle of Kobani in 2014 began, isis lost a significant amount of men and material trying to capture and hold the city against the kurds. followed by battle of tall brak, Russian airstrike begin somewhere late 2015, almost a full year late, there were no Russian airstrike in Kobane, Baiji, Ramadi, Jurf al shakr, Tikrit.

even when isis is already badly battered by US airpower ,the Syrian as well as their Iranian and Russian allies shows their usual incompetence by losing Palmyra twice, and got beaten back as far as Al-Qaryatayn.

Syrian as well as Iraqi troops are actually the biggest suppliers of arms for isis as they often left huge amount of arms behind to be captured by isis.

it's the truth.
ISIS imploded after Trump canceled the weapon program, they were defeated in Kobani but they still held huge territory. There is no reason for Russia to attack ISIS position to help the US "moderate rebels" in those region. Evidence points to the US and their Arab allies, turns out Syria helping the rebels turns out to be fake propaganda. US did airstrikes but their initial attempts were trying to funnel ISIS into Syria instead of Iraq, they were not seriously inflicting a serious blow.
 
ISIS imploded after Trump canceled the weapon program, they were defeated in Kobani but they still held huge territory. There is no reason for Russia to attack ISIS position to help the US "moderate rebels" in those region. Evidence points to the US and their Arab allies, turns out Syria helping the rebels turns out to be fake propaganda. US did airstrikes but their initial attempts were trying to funnel ISIS into Syria instead of Iraq, they were not seriously inflicting a serious blow.
what drugs are you on??

as I said, Syrian as well as Iraqi armies are the largest supplier of arms for isis, do you know how many US arms (Humvees, truck, M198s) got captured in August 2014 alone??? do you know that the largest arms haul in the whole Syrian civil war happened when the Syrian army left it's largest depot to isis.

Islamic State captures Ayyash weapons depots in largest arms haul of Syrian Civil War

Islamic State captures Brigade 93 in largest heavy-arms haul of Syrian Civil War


Another One Bites the Dust: Major arms depot falls to Islamic State

Islamic State captures masses of Iranian-supplied weaponry near Khanasir
Iraq lost 2,300 Humvee armored vehicles in Mosul: PM

Islamic State captures large numbers of radars and missiles at Tadmur (Palmyra) airbase

this helped transform isis into a monster especiall in the 2014-2015 period, might want to remind you that isis is close to encircle Baghdad herself, if it wasn't for quick and precise deployment of US airpower then there's no question Baghdad herself will fell.

In fact the Syrian+Iranian+Russian forces took advantge of isis preoccupation with US led forces that they try to attack Tadmur (Palmyra),

No End In Sight: Failed Tabqa Offensive Reveals Underlying Shortcomings Of Regime Forces

only to be beaten by a handful of isis troops. shows just how incompetent this trio are.
Stop making stupid accusations to undermine US efforts against isis with some silly conspiracy theory
 
There is no reason for Russia to attack ISIS position to help the US "moderate rebels" in those region.
off course there is, one of the initial Russian attack is against Kuwaires airbase which is besieged by isis troops.

it's just Russian airstrike intensity and precision is not that good as that of USA, and it's impact not as large.
 
Back
Top Bottom