Big Tank
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2013
- Messages
- 3,333
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
I slightly disagree because I'm afraid that will backfire and people will not accept such restrictions. However there are more palatable ways for example involving a council of scholars from all the sects at the central govt level to lay down a criteria for the selection of the Imam in the masjid especially the Jamie-masjid where jumma sermons are offered. Also integrating the local community more the masjid so they control and keep an on all activities in the masjid. No masjid should be allowed to be constructed without full analysis and assessment of its purpose.
Spoiler alert: I tell you a story so as to understand their modus operandi.
I remember that the masjid made by people of my father's village was open for all including Shias, Sunnis (brelvi, deobandi) and Wahabis but then Deobandis and Wahabis colluded together to take over the masjid slowly by inviting the tableeghis into the masjid and addressing the locals. The first ones to get uncomfortable were the Shias but they stayed silent so as to gel in until an idiot objected their way of praying and pointed out the differences. That was the time when my father realised that situation was getting out of control and he involved the community and with the support of the local authorities (police), they were able to wrest back the control of the masjid from the clutches of the sectarian mullahs. However, they build a separate masjid around 500 yards away. So they are still able to get some people as regular visitors in their masjid (mostly the deobandis and wahabis) and thus the village have got sectarian divide which did not exist previously. If there was a mechanism for assessment and permission for building the masjid, it would have not been built in the first place.
I agree. Deobandis and Wahabis use the Sweet Knife a.k.a Tableeghi Jamat to occupy mosques and exploit the whole communities.