What's new

Thar coal test burn

Hyde

SENIOR MODERATOR
Joined
Oct 20, 2008
Messages
20,543
Reaction score
20
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
Thar coal test burn


By Ashfak Bokhari

mach-coalmine-blast-543.jpg

Dr Samar Mubarakmand is engaged in Block 5 of Thar Coalfield to produce electricity from coal through gasification process. — File Photo

THE decision to carry out the test burn of coal earlier than the scheduled date of March next year under the Underground Coal Gasification Project is good news. The need for converting coal into electricity to overcome the ever-aggravating power crisis has never been as urgent as it is today.

Dr Samar Mubarakmand, the nuclear scientist, who runs the UGC is also a member of the Planning Commission dealing with this project. The decision to revisit the test burn date was taken after he met President Zardari before his departure for China.

The scientist is engaged in Block 5 of Thar Coalfield to produce electricity from coal through gasification process, which after an initial test burn of three to five megawatts, will be scaled up to 100 megawatts. In February, Dr Mubarakmand had said at a seminar in Hyderabad that Thar coal deposits will take another three to four years to be put to use for producing power. But perhaps it may take less time now.

Coal deposits worth 175-185 billion tonnes of lignite were discovered by the Geological Survey of Pakistan (GSP) in Thar in 1992 and the good news was that these were so vast in quantity that they could guarantee self-sufficiency in energy for 200 years. But, sadly enough, they are still lying in deserts like a huge waste for various bureaucratic, economic and political reasons. Several bodies and committees were formed and dismissed, some blocks allocated to foreign firms and then cancelled. In recent years, one witnessed a prolonged power tussle between the Sindh government and the Centre over the control of Thar deposits. Finally, Sindh politicians won the battle but the coal remains to be mined.

Thar project has assumed urgency at a time when coal is losing its appeal as a cheaper energy source because of its major contribution to global warming. Now it is called ‘dirty fuel’. In most countries such as the US, China, Europe and India, coal has been and still is a great source of energy but they are now taking measures to cut down its share in their energy mix. Coal generates about half of all electricity in the US but by 2035, its share will get reduced to 44 per cent. Coal-fired generation will gradually change. The ultimate goal is elimination of coal-fired plants to do away with their gas emissions. Future belongs to coal gasification but it is a costly proposition.

However, Pakistan can still opt for coal-fired plants because it is not a big polluter and its contribution to gas emissions is hardly one per cent. The government has already taken an initiative by constituting a ministerial committee for coordination with key federal ministers in order to seek international financing in infrastructure development schemes. But seeking such investments can be problematic because of growing reluctance of western countries to promote coal-based projects.

Besides, international lending bodies are under pressure from environmental groups to refrain from funding such projects. The World Bank has been accused of “incoherence” in its energy policy. It invested record sums last year in coal power, the most carbon intensive form of energy, despite its international commitments to slash the carbon emissions.

The World Bank said in September that a total of $3.4bn – or a quarter of all funding for energy projects – was spent in the year to June 2010 helping to build new coal-fired power stations, including a controversial plant in South Africa. Over the same period the bank also spent $1bn on looking and drilling for oil and gas. The bank is seeking to gain control of the billions which will be channelled to developing countries to help them cope with global warming and, at the same time, it is still lending large sums to finance coal-fired plants.

Globally, the share of coal in power generation is 38 per cent, compared to 0.1 per cent in Pakistan. It is strange that while developed nations discourage power generation through coal in developing countries, none of them is willing to abandon its own coal plants. With newer methods of gasification of coal underground, the pollution can be lowered drastically. A chemical analysis of the Thar reserves shows that not only it is a good quality lignite, it has a lot of moisture in it, further benefiting the gasification process.

According to Sindh Chief Minister Syed Qaim Ali Shah, the completion of two initial bankable feasibility studies of Thar coal project is a significant headway. Together with these, the ‘landmark October 15 approval’ of fiscal incentive package by the federal cabinet’s Economic Coordination Committee would enable the ‘stakeholders to give impetus to the fast-track development of the coal deposits’.

Under the package, the investors would be exempted for 30 years from customs duties on import of coal mining and construction machinery at Thar, get exemption on withholding tax and other levies such as WWF, WPPF and federal excise duty. Sindh government is launching its first public-private venture with Sindh Engro Coal Mining Company and would soon start infrastructure development in Thar.

The Planning Commission has launched a project for the conversion of underground coal in Tharparkar into coal gas without bringing coal on the ground. Capital investment at the Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) based power generation system is about $1 per KWH for small plants of less than 100 MW and about $0.8 per KWH for larger plants of 500MW capacity. Several thousand megawatts energy is already being generated in several countries such as Russia, Central Asian States, Europe, Canada, Australia, China and South Africa from UCG system.

During the current fiscal year, an allocation of Rs8 billion had been made in Sindh for critical infrastructure projects relating to the project — Rs4 billion for water supply, Rs2 billion each for effluent disposal and laying of transmission lines — besides an allocation of Rs2 billion to fund management house for coal development to secure the equity required for the project.
 
Looks like Pakistani engineers are not exercising required safety measures.
They need to go on a safety course before embarking on real work.
Clearly the equipment and dress is not right.
I could even see the sleepers near the wagon. How those ended up their?
 
Looks like Pakistani engineers are not exercising required safety measures.
They need to go on a safety course before embarking on real work.
Clearly the equipment and dress is not right.
I could even see the sleepers near the wagon. How those ended up their?

well this is a file photo so not necessarily mean its from the same block 5 where Dr Samar is working.

Secondly its Pakistan and we all know wahan kaise kaam hota hai :lol:
 
I look forward to further progress on this important energy project.
 
Looks like Pakistani engineers are not exercising required safety measures.
They need to go on a safety course before embarking on real work.
Clearly the equipment and dress is not right.
I could even see the sleepers near the wagon. How those ended up their?

Safety costs money, it is as simple as that. How much does the project team want to spend on safety?
 
I don't know! what is the point in asking?

But your astute observations on the photograph already indicate the answer: they do not want to spend very much on safety!
 
I think the capital investment figures given are out of this world.
0.8 USD for 1 kilowatt implies that for 500 Megawatt you only need an investment of 400,000 USD?
This is too cheap and i wish it were true but maybe the figure is not accurate.

I think this would be 1USD per watt most likely.
In that case it is 400 Million USD!
 
UCG economics appear promising, but uncertainties in capital and operating costs are likely to persist until all the lying treasonous sycophants making policies are send home. On a serious note, has anyone and in particular Dr Samar Mubarakmand thought about environmental hazards associated with UCG. There are alternative for energy production but there aren’ any substitutes for water and this country cannot afford groundwater contamination.
 
The guy leading this project is one of scientist of Nuclear program. He was on capital talk few days ago.
 
UCG economics appear promising, but uncertainties in capital and operating costs are likely to persist until all the lying treasonous sycophants making policies are send home. On a serious note, has anyone and in particular Dr Samar Mubarakmand thought about environmental hazards associated with UCG. There are alternative for energy production but there aren’ any substitutes for water and this country cannot afford groundwater contamination.

its the environmental consideration basically that we r using UCG instead of direct mining..acc to dr. samar the international teams have given green signal to UCG as the carbon content is just 1/4th compared to direct drilling n this much is allowed per int'l standards...

on a side note, its just because of resolve of ppl like dr. samar that even this pilot project is underway n who r not bothered abt safety concerns..had it been for our pathetic politicians we wouldnt have seen even this much progress..may salutes to them!!n pakistan is not a polluter, yet we r to bare the brunt of "civilized worlds" deeds who now lecture us on env. issues..we had a golden opportunity to finance such projects from carbon credit schemes but as usual the snail speed thinking capacity of govt proved to be a hurdle--as usual!!
 
Looks like Pakistani engineers are not exercising required safety measures.
They need to go on a safety course before embarking on real work.
Clearly the equipment and dress is not right.
I could even see the sleepers near the wagon. How those ended up their?

True but the engineer in the shalwar kameez has a Gas Detector on him, that is a very important bit of kit in confined spaces. They are all wearing safety helmets and head lamps.

Only 1 is wearing a Boiler Suit, but i am surprised that they employ gas detectors, that in itself shows they "do" consider health and safety.

Re: Slippers, well it's Pakistan

Also the Centre for Improving working conditions and enviroment is an excellent resource on how Pakistan is working on HSE:
Home :: CIWE
 
Safety costs money, it is as simple as that. How much does the project team want to spend on safety?

My brother who is a mechanical Engineer at a petrol plant told me that the local labour force do not like wearing protective gear as it hampers their natural mobility. Call it what you like, they would much rather work this way. I know this is wrong and we should really force them to adopt safety measures, but ally that with the contractors reluctance to cough up money for the protective gear and you have a lethal combination.
Araz
 
My brother who is a mechanical Engineer at a petrol plant told me that the local labour force do not like wearing protective gear as it hampers their natural mobility. Call it what you like, they would much rather work this way. I know this is wrong and we should really force them to adopt safety measures, but ally that with the contractors reluctance to cough up money for the protective gear and you have a lethal combination.
Araz

If you think that's bad, you should have seen the uranium mines in the beginning, with yellow uranium ore dust coating beards and clothes and even donkeys. :D
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom