What's new

TF-X Turkish Fighter & Trainer Aircraft Projects

Moment ... a timeline that anyway does not fit and is impossible to reach is now called one year ahead and cut by one year to an even more impossible one and you still think it can be done since it is "official"??? :crazy:

Come on, even by this official timeline, SSR is not yet done, detailed design not even started and you want us to believe in yet another propaganda claim, maiden flight will be already in 2025?? :omghaha:

Not sure in what fantasy-land you are living.


Wow, ok. Then I should take seriously not the CEO of TAI, but an Asian person with a German flag in Pdf. As a result, he has enough knowledge and experience to understand that an airplane seen in satellite image, which is said to be first flight years later, is actually a mock-up. Could you please tell me boss, how should I go about making such determinations?

Ekran Alıntısı.JPG
 
. .
All depends upon Turkish engine development..finger crossed


Yes, and that's exactly the point. Even with interim F110 engines it is a hard task, since neither any of the required milestones has been archived not the engine issue finally settled. See my last comment:



Wow, ok. Then I should take seriously not the CEO of TAI, but an Asian person with a German flag in Pdf. As a result, he has enough knowledge and experience to understand that an airplane seen in satellite image, which is said to be first flight years later, is actually a mock-up. Could you please tell me boss, how should I go about making such determinations?

Wow ... so long here at the PDF and you still think I'm a false-flagger? :hitwall:
It is not a secret who I am and where I live. As such to think I'm a "an Asian person with a German flag in Pdf" only proves what I expect since some time: You are neither interested in facts not interested or able to research and think on your own. A Turkish CEO claims what no other country ever archived: So yes, it must be true ... since he is a CEO!

If that CEO would tell you Turkey obeys to human rights, freedom of speech you also believe him?
Exactly the same with that TFX/MMU fuss. Just look and think, read and learn:

There is NO way this could be a real MMU/TFX, as such it MUST be a mock up only since nothing else currently exists and IMO ever will materialise as long as you and any CEO learns that even in Turkey the laws of Physics are valid, that proper designing, engineering and manufacturing takes time, requires a lot of experience and budget and not only some chest-bumping words from a CEO, who's nothing but a political marionette under President Erdogan's mercy.

Based on yet another fan-boy's claim, there is now another "solution" for the engine issue:

1627996501986.png


So now some of you are so desperate that they want to tell us that so late in the development process they are again changing the engine and this time "eventually" to Ivchenko-Progress? :omghaha:

And you think a maiden flight in 2025 is possible of an aircraft with not even SSR done or do you want to make us even believe this is already the MMU prototype secretly assembled and already finished?
 
.
Yes, and that's exactly the point. Even with interim F110 engines it is a hard task, since neither any of the required milestones has been archived not the engine issue finally settled. See my last comment:





Wow ... so long here at the PDF and you still think I'm a false-flagger? :hitwall:
It is not a secret who I am and where I live. As such to think I'm a "an Asian person with a German flag in Pdf" only proves what I expect since some time: You are neither interested in facts not interested or able to research and think on your own. A Turkish CEO claims what no other country ever archived: So yes, it must be true ... since he is a CEO!

If that CEO would tell you Turkey obeys to human rights, freedom of speech you also believe him?
Exactly the same with that TFX/MMU fuss. Just look and think, read and learn:

There is NO way this could be a real MMU/TFX, as such it MUST be a mock up only since nothing else currently exists and IMO ever will materialise as long as you and any CEO learns that even in Turkey the laws of Physics are valid, that proper designing, engineering and manufacturing takes time, requires a lot of experience and budget and not only some chest-bumping words from a CEO, who's nothing but a political marionette under President Erdogan's mercy.

Based on yet another fan-boy's claim, there is now another "solution" for the engine issue:

View attachment 767036

So now some of you are so desperate that they want to tell us that so late in the development process they are again changing the engine and this time "eventually" to Ivchenko-Progress? :omghaha:

And you think a maiden flight in 2025 is possible of an aircraft with not even SSR done or do you want to make us even believe this is already the MMU prototype secretly assembled and already finished?


No official statement has said that the engines will be Ivchenko Progress or any other Ukrainian/Russian origin engine. It's just a matter of comedy that someone who officially accepts what his Asian friends said in a forum he set up to spend the spare time of the 70-year-old yankees should worry so much about Kotil's political affiliation.
 
.
No official statement has said that the engines will be Ivchenko Progress or any other Ukrainian/Russian origin engine. It's just a matter of comedy that someone who officially accepts what his Asian friends said in a forum he set up to spend the spare time of the 70-year-old yankees should worry so much about Kotil's political affiliation.


No, quite or exactly the opposite is a "matter of comedy" or most likely will end in tragedy: I cannot understand why you cannot accept that any critics is not an offence or insult and that such a project takes time. As such it is not what any "Asian friends said in a forum" but what international analysts say.

My point is that you don't argue, but only rephrase what any politician and politically influenced CEO at TAI says and that's propaganda.

By the way, last year I was invited to lecture about the future PLAAF fighter developments on a conference regarding future air combat systems in London at RUSI - albeit it was cancelled due to COVID -, and the TFX was not even mentioned since no one takes these claims seriously.

But anyway, since we are not authoritative, you remain in your bubble of PR and propaganda, but that does not change the fact that nothing fits and the sooner you accept this the lesser it hurts when nothing will happen in 2023 for the roll out of an alleged MMU/TFX true prototype or even a 2025 maiden flight.
 
.
All depends upon Turkish engine development..finger crossed

This is that I always advocate in Turkish thread, learn to walk first before run, They need to concentrate their ambition to make jet engine for their cruise missile and UCAV first and let TFX uses foreign jet engine. Just dont let what happen with Altay project happen again. I get a sense that this is merely Erdogan ambition and he some time irrational, just look what he did to stabillize Lira

Just see KF 21/IFX program, they already get a supply deal of F 414 in 2015 from GE ( and US gov approval ), while some years before there were already a tender going on between GE and European consortium to supply engine for KF 21/IFX program. Fighter design depends also with the kind of engine they want to use.
 
.
- impossible is not in the Turkish dictionary : :turkey:
a few years ago we heard the same things about turkish drones,
that they will not be effective, that they will fall like flies.
today the great european union uses american drones, they don't have any in stock, germany lives under american protection,
it suffices for the USA to whistle for the Germans, French or English to line up.
In reality we have wind experts here, who will never have access to secret projects, whether Chinese, Russian or Turkish.
They are followers of "I know everything without knowing anything in the end".
1628502313489.png



for me drones are the future, fighter planes with pilots are a waste of time, let the west and europe play top-guns and let's move on to 100% AI drones
 
Last edited:
.
start by stopping looking to the west,

Europe and America is the past, Asia and Africa is the future,

Europe does not even have the means to meet its needs in oil and minerals without Africa and Asia it would be a return to the Middle Ages.

We have a multitude of people who think that their planes, ships or rockets fly with the wind when they are entirely dependent on 99% imported oil and uranium.


1628504000319.png
1628503879011.png

1628503892783.png
1628503904516.png
 
.
All depends upon Turkish engine development..finger crossed
A fighter engine is among the most complicated object to study and fine tune. I'm sorry to say that it is not at the actual turkish technical level.
It's already a challenge to study and built a high power main battle tank engine, so a fighter engine which have to run from -50° to +50°, with a entry turbine temperature up to 1800°C, under 9G, with the lightest design possible is not for tomorrow. I'm sorry but it's the truth. Just see the Indian exemple, and even the Chinese experience (they used so much money and so many ingeneers and their engine are limited to some hundreds hours before to be scrapped).
Europe does not even have the means to meet its needs in oil and minerals without Africa and Asia it would be a return to the Middle Ages.
:lol::lol::lol:
a few years ago we heard the same things about turkish drones,
comparing a (good) fighter engine and a drone is like to compare V2 rocket and Saturn V. They all flown but just one reach the moon.
 
.
A fighter engine is among the most complicated object to study and fine tune. I'm sorry to say that it is not at the actual turkish technical level.
It's already a challenge to study and built a high power main battle tank engine, so a fighter engine which have to run from -50° to +50°, with a entry turbine temperature up to 1800°C, under 9G, with the lightest design possible is not for tomorrow. I'm sorry but it's the truth. Just see the Indian exemple, and even the Chinese experience (they used so much money and so many ingeneers and their engine are limited to some hundreds hours before to be scrapped).

:lol::lol::lol:

comparing a (good) fighter engine and a drone is like to compare V2 rocket and Saturn V. They all flown but just one reach the moon.

Quite true but I'm sorry it should also be said the old "hundreds" of hours of operation is not before being scrapped but before major overhaul.

Anyway that was only true for first WS-10 back in 2009 before even used on every J-11B fighter. Since WS-10A has reached 1000+ hours and then 2000 hours beating Al-31 in time before major overhaul. Now the engine range is dependent on how much they push thrust. For models that tuned to produce more thrust, the life is shorter and detuned has longer life before overhaul. If each engine is scrapped as you say just several hundred hours, China would already have built 50 factories just for WS-10 and spent $1 trillion US dollars just to buy enough WS-10 engines for all the J-11B and now J-10 and J-20 which uses a version of later WS-10.
 
.
A fighter engine is among the most complicated object to study and fine tune. I'm sorry to say that it is not at the actual turkish technical level.
It's already a challenge to study and built a high power main battle tank engine, so a fighter engine which have to run from -50° to +50°, with a entry turbine temperature up to 1800°C, under 9G, with the lightest design possible is not for tomorrow. I'm sorry but it's the truth. Just see the Indian exemple, and even the Chinese experience (they used so much money and so many ingeneers and their engine are limited to some hundreds hours before to be scrapped).

:lol::lol::lol:

comparing a (good) fighter engine and a drone is like to compare V2 rocket and Saturn V. They all flown but just one reach the moon.
here you go. You are partially right on China. They are a COMMUNIST STATE owned country that reverse engineers. They're STUCK. We are different though. We have experience and we have good machinists. It's amazing the hype Chinese jets get. They can't even make a good steel motorcycle that lasts. I have been looking but their steel is inferior.


How China is trying to fix the biggest problem plaguing its fighter jets

Benjamin Brimelow






J-20 stealth fighter china

China's J-20 stealth fighter jet. Reuters
  • China's leaders regularly tout their country's fighter jets as symbols of military capability.
  • But China's fighter jets have long had a major shortcoming: a lack of quality engines.
  • China's defense industry has struggled with that flaw, but Beijing is working hard to fix it.

10 Things in Politics: The latest in politics & the economy

Email address




By clicking ‘Sign up’, you agree to receive marketing emails from Insider as well as other partner offers and accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Of all the fighters in China's arsenal, none are as important as the J-20.

The fifth-generation fighter also known as the "Mighty Dragon" is more than just a stealth fighter. It's an example that China, like the US, can build some of the best military technology in the world.

It has become a symbol for the Chinese Communist Party, shown proudly at military parades and mentioned repeatedly in Chinese defense publications.

After a brutal brawl with Indian troops on the countries' disputed border last year, China sent two J-20s to airbases in Xinjiang.


That deployment was too small to be of any real strategic significance, but the fact that China deployed its best fighter jet to a remote area in the Himalayas showed its seriousness. The J-20's deployment to China's Eastern Theatre Command is meant to send a similar message to Taiwan, Japan, and the US.

But the J-20, like all Chinese aircraft, has been hobbled by a lack of efficient and durable, high-performance jet engines.

That problem has plagued China's defense industry for a long time, and it's one Beijing is working hard to fix.

A long-standing problem


5ac65a466898752b008b473e

China's J-20 stealth fighter jet. Reuters
China's difficulties with jet engines may be surprising given the country's massive and successful military buildup.


It's also no secret that China is skilled at reverse-engineering foreign technology to make domestic copies. Virtually every Chinese fighter jet is based on stolen or reverse-engineered designs.

There is precedent for reverse-engineering jet engines, but while China has plenty of access to Russian jet engines, Beijing's attempts to produce its own domestic designs have been largely unsuccessful.

One of its earliest versions of a domestically designed engine, the WS-10A, regularly broke down after just 30 hours of use.

There are many reasons for these failures. First, Russia is aware China has stolen its intellectual property before and is reluctant to sell Beijing its best engines. Moscow also doesn't sell standalone engines, instead including them on existing jets, which makes copying them difficult.


Second, reverse-engineering skill doesn't easily translate into proficiency at developing new jet engines from scratch. That requires technological know-how that takes years of intensive learning to develop and generations to perfect.

The 'apex' of technological manufacturing


China's J-20 stealth fighter jet. Reuters
Perhaps most important, manufacturing jet engines is just extremely complicated.

"There are a few technologies that are really at the apex of technological manufacturing," and jet engines are one of them, Timothy Heath, a senior international and defense researcher at the Rand Corporation think tank, told Insider.

"These high-end technologies are so difficult to master that very few countries succeed. Many have failed," Heath added.


The main difficulty lies in the metallurgy and machining. A single engine on a civilian Boeing 747 airliner, for example, has at least 40,000 parts. Temperatures in that engine can reach as high as 2,500 degrees Fahrenheit, and its fan blades can spin well over 3,000 times a minute during an hours-long flight.

Blueprints for such an engine can be copied, but the secrets to producing and shaping metal parts that can withstand those temperatures and spin at such tremendous RPM over thousands of hours — not to mention external factors like wind resistance and corrosion — without breaking aren't easy to find.

Another disadvantage for China is that the entities tasked with developing these complex machines are state-owned enterprises.

Historically speaking, SOEs struggle with innovation and developing cutting-edge technology. The reliance on reverse-engineering shows that this is the case with China, though there are certainly exceptions.


"They're better at just reverse-engineering simpler components and building simpler things," Heath said. "All this requires a level of expertise and competence that SOEs just often are not very good at. You have to recognize the limitations of the SOEs in China when it comes to innovation."

'Crucial technology cannot be bought'


5d3f6a812516e937b0190f5c

China's J-20 stealth fighter at an air show in 2016. REUTERS/Stringer
China is more than aware of its engine problems.

Liu Daxiang, the deputy director of the science and technology committee at the state-owned Aviation Industry Corporation of China, last year called the development of domestic jet engines "a serious and urgent political task" and said China was facing an "unprecedented challenge."

"The established countries in aviation have become more strict with us when it comes to technology access," Liu said, adding that recent US efforts to restrict opportunities for the Chinese telecommunications firm Huawei "tells us that crucial technology cannot be bought, even if you spend big."


In an attempt to get direct access to the secrets of jet manufacturing, the Chinese state-owned aviation firm Skyrizon, which has been blacklisted by the US government, tried to acquire a controlling stake in Motor Sich, a Ukrainian company that is one of the largest producers of engines for helicopters, jets, and missiles.

But the Ukrainian government this year stopped the deal, most likely because of pressure from the US.

Despite the setbacks, China has made some progress. Modern variants of the WS-10 have progressed enough that some Chinese jets are being fitted with them, including numerous J-20s.

Chinese sources have said that the WS-15, an engine designed specifically for the J-20, "may be finished within one or two years" and that once those engines are installed, the J-20 will be "on a par" with the US's fifth-generation F-22 Raptor.

Ballpoint pens, microchips, and jet engines


Chinese J-20 stealth fighters. Reuters
But many challenges remain. The complexity of the materials and metallurgy process, the costs of acquiring and maintaining the scientific and machining expertise, and the reluctance of other countries to assist China for fear of intellectual-property theft are but a few of them.

China faces a similar predicament in manufacturing high-end microchips and semiconductors. Despite hundreds of millions of dollars and major efforts by state-owned enterprises, China has not been able to create its own computer chips.

"It's just that some of these technologies are extremely difficult to do, and it doesn't matter how much money you throw at it — if you don't have the right combination of people, technologies, and skills, it's just not going to come together so easily," Heath said.

But China doesn't give up easily. In 2017, a Chinese state-owned firm announced plans to mass-produce ballpoint pen tips for the first time. China already made billions of pens, but only after a five-year, multimillion-dollar effort did it develop the technology to make tips for those pens domestically.


"All these elements can be reached only through long-term investment and incremental development," a Chinese researcher said at the time.

How China is trying to fix the biggest problem plaguing its fighter jets

Benjamin Brimelow
J-20 stealth fighter china


China's J-20 stealth fighter jet.
Reuters
  • China's leaders regularly tout their country's fighter jets as symbols of military capability.
  • But China's fighter jets have long had a major shortcoming: a lack of quality engines.
  • China's defense industry has struggled with that flaw, but Beijing is working hard to fix it.
10 Things in Politics: The latest in politics & the economy
Email address
By clicking ‘Sign up’, you agree to receive marketing emails from Insider as well as other partner offers and accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Of all the fighters in China's arsenal, none are as important as the J-20.
The fifth-generation fighter also known as the "Mighty Dragon" is more than just a stealth fighter. It's an example that China, like the US, can build some of the best military technology in the world.
It has become a symbol for the Chinese Communist Party, shown proudly at military parades and mentioned repeatedly in Chinese defense publications.
After a brutal brawl with Indian troops on the countries' disputed border last year, China sent two J-20s to airbases in Xinjiang.
That deployment was too small to be of any real strategic significance, but the fact that China deployed its best fighter jet to a remote area in the Himalayas showed its seriousness. The J-20's deployment to China's Eastern Theatre Command is meant to send a similar message to Taiwan, Japan, and the US.
But the J-20, like all Chinese aircraft, has been hobbled by a lack of efficient and durable, high-performance jet engines.
That problem has plagued China's defense industry for a long time, and it's one Beijing is working hard to fix.
A long-standing problem

5ac65a466898752b008b473e


China's J-20 stealth fighter jet.
Reuters
China's difficulties with jet engines may be surprising given the country's massive and successful military buildup.
It's also no secret that China is skilled at reverse-engineering foreign technology to make domestic copies. Virtually every Chinese fighter jet is based on stolen or reverse-engineered designs.
There is precedent for reverse-engineering jet engines, but while China has plenty of access to Russian jet engines, Beijing's attempts to produce its own domestic designs have been largely unsuccessful.
One of its earliest versions of a domestically designed engine, the WS-10A, regularly broke down after just 30 hours of use.
There are many reasons for these failures. First, Russia is aware China has stolen its intellectual property before and is reluctant to sell Beijing its best engines. Moscow also doesn't sell standalone engines, instead including them on existing jets, which makes copying them difficult.
Second, reverse-engineering skill doesn't easily translate into proficiency at developing new jet engines from scratch. That requires technological know-how that takes years of intensive learning to develop and generations to perfect.
The 'apex' of technological manufacturing

China's J-20 stealth fighter jet.
Reuters
Perhaps most important, manufacturing jet engines is just extremely complicated.
"There are a few technologies that are really at the apex of technological manufacturing," and jet engines are one of them, Timothy Heath, a senior international and defense researcher at the Rand Corporation think tank, told Insider.
"These high-end technologies are so difficult to master that very few countries succeed. Many have failed," Heath added.
The main difficulty lies in the metallurgy and machining. A single engine on a civilian Boeing 747 airliner, for example, has at least 40,000 parts. Temperatures in that engine can reach as high as 2,500 degrees Fahrenheit, and its fan blades can spin well over 3,000 times a minute during an hours-long flight.
Blueprints for such an engine can be copied, but the secrets to producing and shaping metal parts that can withstand those temperatures and spin at such tremendous RPM over thousands of hours — not to mention external factors like wind resistance and corrosion — without breaking aren't easy to find.
Another disadvantage for China is that the entities tasked with developing these complex machines are state-owned enterprises.
Historically speaking, SOEs struggle with innovation and developing cutting-edge technology. The reliance on reverse-engineering shows that this is the case with China, though there are certainly exceptions.
"They're better at just reverse-engineering simpler components and building simpler things," Heath said. "All this requires a level of expertise and competence that SOEs just often are not very good at. You have to recognize the limitations of the SOEs in China when it comes to innovation."
'Crucial technology cannot be bought'

5d3f6a812516e937b0190f5c


China's J-20 stealth fighter at an air show in 2016.
REUTERS/Stringer
China is more than aware of its engine problems.
Liu Daxiang, the deputy director of the science and technology committee at the state-owned Aviation Industry Corporation of China, last year called the development of domestic jet engines "a serious and urgent political task" and said China was facing an "unprecedented challenge."
"The established countries in aviation have become more strict with us when it comes to technology access," Liu said, adding that recent US efforts to restrict opportunities for the Chinese telecommunications firm Huawei "tells us that crucial technology cannot be bought, even if you spend big."
In an attempt to get direct access to the secrets of jet manufacturing, the Chinese state-owned aviation firm Skyrizon, which has been blacklisted by the US government, tried to acquire a controlling stake in Motor Sich, a Ukrainian company that is one of the largest producers of engines for helicopters, jets, and missiles.
But the Ukrainian government this year stopped the deal, most likely because of pressure from the US.
Despite the setbacks, China has made some progress. Modern variants of the WS-10 have progressed enough that some Chinese jets are being fitted with them, including numerous J-20s.
Chinese sources have said that the WS-15, an engine designed specifically for the J-20, "may be finished within one or two years" and that once those engines are installed, the J-20 will be "on a par" with the US's fifth-generation F-22 Raptor.
Ballpoint pens, microchips, and jet engines

Chinese J-20 stealth fighters.
Reuters
But many challenges remain. The complexity of the materials and metallurgy process, the costs of acquiring and maintaining the scientific and machining expertise, and the reluctance of other countries to assist China for fear of intellectual-property theft are but a few of them.
China faces a similar predicament in manufacturing high-end microchips and semiconductors. Despite hundreds of millions of dollars and major efforts by state-owned enterprises, China has not been able to create its own computer chips.
"It's just that some of these technologies are extremely difficult to do, and it doesn't matter how much money you throw at it — if you don't have the right combination of people, technologies, and skills, it's just not going to come together so easily," Heath said.
But China doesn't give up easily. In 2017, a Chinese state-owned firm announced plans to mass-produce ballpoint pen tips for the first time. China already made billions of pens, but only after a five-year, multimillion-dollar effort did it develop the technology to make tips for those pens domestically.
"All these elements can be reached only through long-term investment and incremental development," a Chinese researcher said at the time.
 
.
here you go. You are partially right on China. They are a COMMUNIST STATE owned country that reverse engineers. They're STUCK. We are different though. We have experience and we have good machinists. It's amazing the hype Chinese jets get. They can't even make a good steel motorcycle that lasts. I have been looking but their steel is inferior.


How China is trying to fix the biggest problem plaguing its fighter jets

Benjamin Brimelow






J-20 stealth fighter china

China's J-20 stealth fighter jet. Reuters
  • China's leaders regularly tout their country's fighter jets as symbols of military capability.
  • But China's fighter jets have long had a major shortcoming: a lack of quality engines.
  • China's defense industry has struggled with that flaw, but Beijing is working hard to fix it.

10 Things in Politics: The latest in politics & the economy

Email address




By clicking ‘Sign up’, you agree to receive marketing emails from Insider as well as other partner offers and accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Of all the fighters in China's arsenal, none are as important as the J-20.

The fifth-generation fighter also known as the "Mighty Dragon" is more than just a stealth fighter. It's an example that China, like the US, can build some of the best military technology in the world.

It has become a symbol for the Chinese Communist Party, shown proudly at military parades and mentioned repeatedly in Chinese defense publications.

After a brutal brawl with Indian troops on the countries' disputed border last year, China sent two J-20s to airbases in Xinjiang.


That deployment was too small to be of any real strategic significance, but the fact that China deployed its best fighter jet to a remote area in the Himalayas showed its seriousness. The J-20's deployment to China's Eastern Theatre Command is meant to send a similar message to Taiwan, Japan, and the US.

But the J-20, like all Chinese aircraft, has been hobbled by a lack of efficient and durable, high-performance jet engines.

That problem has plagued China's defense industry for a long time, and it's one Beijing is working hard to fix.

A long-standing problem


5ac65a466898752b008b473e

China's J-20 stealth fighter jet. Reuters
China's difficulties with jet engines may be surprising given the country's massive and successful military buildup.


It's also no secret that China is skilled at reverse-engineering foreign technology to make domestic copies. Virtually every Chinese fighter jet is based on stolen or reverse-engineered designs.

There is precedent for reverse-engineering jet engines, but while China has plenty of access to Russian jet engines, Beijing's attempts to produce its own domestic designs have been largely unsuccessful.

One of its earliest versions of a domestically designed engine, the WS-10A, regularly broke down after just 30 hours of use.

There are many reasons for these failures. First, Russia is aware China has stolen its intellectual property before and is reluctant to sell Beijing its best engines. Moscow also doesn't sell standalone engines, instead including them on existing jets, which makes copying them difficult.


Second, reverse-engineering skill doesn't easily translate into proficiency at developing new jet engines from scratch. That requires technological know-how that takes years of intensive learning to develop and generations to perfect.

The 'apex' of technological manufacturing


China's J-20 stealth fighter jet. Reuters
Perhaps most important, manufacturing jet engines is just extremely complicated.

"There are a few technologies that are really at the apex of technological manufacturing," and jet engines are one of them, Timothy Heath, a senior international and defense researcher at the Rand Corporation think tank, told Insider.

"These high-end technologies are so difficult to master that very few countries succeed. Many have failed," Heath added.


The main difficulty lies in the metallurgy and machining. A single engine on a civilian Boeing 747 airliner, for example, has at least 40,000 parts. Temperatures in that engine can reach as high as 2,500 degrees Fahrenheit, and its fan blades can spin well over 3,000 times a minute during an hours-long flight.

Blueprints for such an engine can be copied, but the secrets to producing and shaping metal parts that can withstand those temperatures and spin at such tremendous RPM over thousands of hours — not to mention external factors like wind resistance and corrosion — without breaking aren't easy to find.

Another disadvantage for China is that the entities tasked with developing these complex machines are state-owned enterprises.

Historically speaking, SOEs struggle with innovation and developing cutting-edge technology. The reliance on reverse-engineering shows that this is the case with China, though there are certainly exceptions.


"They're better at just reverse-engineering simpler components and building simpler things," Heath said. "All this requires a level of expertise and competence that SOEs just often are not very good at. You have to recognize the limitations of the SOEs in China when it comes to innovation."

'Crucial technology cannot be bought'


5d3f6a812516e937b0190f5c

China's J-20 stealth fighter at an air show in 2016. REUTERS/Stringer
China is more than aware of its engine problems.

Liu Daxiang, the deputy director of the science and technology committee at the state-owned Aviation Industry Corporation of China, last year called the development of domestic jet engines "a serious and urgent political task" and said China was facing an "unprecedented challenge."

"The established countries in aviation have become more strict with us when it comes to technology access," Liu said, adding that recent US efforts to restrict opportunities for the Chinese telecommunications firm Huawei "tells us that crucial technology cannot be bought, even if you spend big."


In an attempt to get direct access to the secrets of jet manufacturing, the Chinese state-owned aviation firm Skyrizon, which has been blacklisted by the US government, tried to acquire a controlling stake in Motor Sich, a Ukrainian company that is one of the largest producers of engines for helicopters, jets, and missiles.

But the Ukrainian government this year stopped the deal, most likely because of pressure from the US.

Despite the setbacks, China has made some progress. Modern variants of the WS-10 have progressed enough that some Chinese jets are being fitted with them, including numerous J-20s.

Chinese sources have said that the WS-15, an engine designed specifically for the J-20, "may be finished within one or two years" and that once those engines are installed, the J-20 will be "on a par" with the US's fifth-generation F-22 Raptor.

Ballpoint pens, microchips, and jet engines


Chinese J-20 stealth fighters. Reuters
But many challenges remain. The complexity of the materials and metallurgy process, the costs of acquiring and maintaining the scientific and machining expertise, and the reluctance of other countries to assist China for fear of intellectual-property theft are but a few of them.

China faces a similar predicament in manufacturing high-end microchips and semiconductors. Despite hundreds of millions of dollars and major efforts by state-owned enterprises, China has not been able to create its own computer chips.

"It's just that some of these technologies are extremely difficult to do, and it doesn't matter how much money you throw at it — if you don't have the right combination of people, technologies, and skills, it's just not going to come together so easily," Heath said.

But China doesn't give up easily. In 2017, a Chinese state-owned firm announced plans to mass-produce ballpoint pen tips for the first time. China already made billions of pens, but only after a five-year, multimillion-dollar effort did it develop the technology to make tips for those pens domestically.


"All these elements can be reached only through long-term investment and incremental development," a Chinese researcher said at the time.

How China is trying to fix the biggest problem plaguing its fighter jets

Benjamin Brimelow
J-20 stealth fighter china


China's J-20 stealth fighter jet.
Reuters
  • China's leaders regularly tout their country's fighter jets as symbols of military capability.
  • But China's fighter jets have long had a major shortcoming: a lack of quality engines.
  • China's defense industry has struggled with that flaw, but Beijing is working hard to fix it.
10 Things in Politics: The latest in politics & the economy
Email address
By clicking ‘Sign up’, you agree to receive marketing emails from Insider as well as other partner offers and accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Of all the fighters in China's arsenal, none are as important as the J-20.
The fifth-generation fighter also known as the "Mighty Dragon" is more than just a stealth fighter. It's an example that China, like the US, can build some of the best military technology in the world.
It has become a symbol for the Chinese Communist Party, shown proudly at military parades and mentioned repeatedly in Chinese defense publications.
After a brutal brawl with Indian troops on the countries' disputed border last year, China sent two J-20s to airbases in Xinjiang.
That deployment was too small to be of any real strategic significance, but the fact that China deployed its best fighter jet to a remote area in the Himalayas showed its seriousness. The J-20's deployment to China's Eastern Theatre Command is meant to send a similar message to Taiwan, Japan, and the US.
But the J-20, like all Chinese aircraft, has been hobbled by a lack of efficient and durable, high-performance jet engines.
That problem has plagued China's defense industry for a long time, and it's one Beijing is working hard to fix.
A long-standing problem

5ac65a466898752b008b473e


China's J-20 stealth fighter jet.
Reuters
China's difficulties with jet engines may be surprising given the country's massive and successful military buildup.
It's also no secret that China is skilled at reverse-engineering foreign technology to make domestic copies. Virtually every Chinese fighter jet is based on stolen or reverse-engineered designs.
There is precedent for reverse-engineering jet engines, but while China has plenty of access to Russian jet engines, Beijing's attempts to produce its own domestic designs have been largely unsuccessful.
One of its earliest versions of a domestically designed engine, the WS-10A, regularly broke down after just 30 hours of use.
There are many reasons for these failures. First, Russia is aware China has stolen its intellectual property before and is reluctant to sell Beijing its best engines. Moscow also doesn't sell standalone engines, instead including them on existing jets, which makes copying them difficult.
Second, reverse-engineering skill doesn't easily translate into proficiency at developing new jet engines from scratch. That requires technological know-how that takes years of intensive learning to develop and generations to perfect.
The 'apex' of technological manufacturing

China's J-20 stealth fighter jet.
Reuters
Perhaps most important, manufacturing jet engines is just extremely complicated.
"There are a few technologies that are really at the apex of technological manufacturing," and jet engines are one of them, Timothy Heath, a senior international and defense researcher at the Rand Corporation think tank, told Insider.
"These high-end technologies are so difficult to master that very few countries succeed. Many have failed," Heath added.
The main difficulty lies in the metallurgy and machining. A single engine on a civilian Boeing 747 airliner, for example, has at least 40,000 parts. Temperatures in that engine can reach as high as 2,500 degrees Fahrenheit, and its fan blades can spin well over 3,000 times a minute during an hours-long flight.
Blueprints for such an engine can be copied, but the secrets to producing and shaping metal parts that can withstand those temperatures and spin at such tremendous RPM over thousands of hours — not to mention external factors like wind resistance and corrosion — without breaking aren't easy to find.
Another disadvantage for China is that the entities tasked with developing these complex machines are state-owned enterprises.
Historically speaking, SOEs struggle with innovation and developing cutting-edge technology. The reliance on reverse-engineering shows that this is the case with China, though there are certainly exceptions.
"They're better at just reverse-engineering simpler components and building simpler things," Heath said. "All this requires a level of expertise and competence that SOEs just often are not very good at. You have to recognize the limitations of the SOEs in China when it comes to innovation."
'Crucial technology cannot be bought'

5d3f6a812516e937b0190f5c


China's J-20 stealth fighter at an air show in 2016.
REUTERS/Stringer
China is more than aware of its engine problems.
Liu Daxiang, the deputy director of the science and technology committee at the state-owned Aviation Industry Corporation of China, last year called the development of domestic jet engines "a serious and urgent political task" and said China was facing an "unprecedented challenge."
"The established countries in aviation have become more strict with us when it comes to technology access," Liu said, adding that recent US efforts to restrict opportunities for the Chinese telecommunications firm Huawei "tells us that crucial technology cannot be bought, even if you spend big."
In an attempt to get direct access to the secrets of jet manufacturing, the Chinese state-owned aviation firm Skyrizon, which has been blacklisted by the US government, tried to acquire a controlling stake in Motor Sich, a Ukrainian company that is one of the largest producers of engines for helicopters, jets, and missiles.
But the Ukrainian government this year stopped the deal, most likely because of pressure from the US.
Despite the setbacks, China has made some progress. Modern variants of the WS-10 have progressed enough that some Chinese jets are being fitted with them, including numerous J-20s.
Chinese sources have said that the WS-15, an engine designed specifically for the J-20, "may be finished within one or two years" and that once those engines are installed, the J-20 will be "on a par" with the US's fifth-generation F-22 Raptor.
Ballpoint pens, microchips, and jet engines

Chinese J-20 stealth fighters.
Reuters
But many challenges remain. The complexity of the materials and metallurgy process, the costs of acquiring and maintaining the scientific and machining expertise, and the reluctance of other countries to assist China for fear of intellectual-property theft are but a few of them.
China faces a similar predicament in manufacturing high-end microchips and semiconductors. Despite hundreds of millions of dollars and major efforts by state-owned enterprises, China has not been able to create its own computer chips.
"It's just that some of these technologies are extremely difficult to do, and it doesn't matter how much money you throw at it — if you don't have the right combination of people, technologies, and skills, it's just not going to come together so easily," Heath said.
But China doesn't give up easily. In 2017, a Chinese state-owned firm announced plans to mass-produce ballpoint pen tips for the first time. China already made billions of pens, but only after a five-year, multimillion-dollar effort did it develop the technology to make tips for those pens domestically.
"All these elements can be reached only through long-term investment and incremental development," a Chinese researcher said at the time.
Very interesting !
But even if you have very good workers, the task is really huge for Pakistan (or for Turkey, or India, or South Korea or....). I think the money and efforts required will be usefull in other domains.
 
. .
You turks say you are better than us because you believe in your race or culture being better.

Yet you have not even done it and you are telling us you can do it. To present evidence you use BusinessInsider on J-20 article which is like North Korean reporting on USA. Okay.

Then the three core technology areas you get wrong and BI also gets wrong. We didn't make ballpoint pen bearings in the past not because we cannot but because these things are just made in a few countries because of economics. Since that news came out three years ago, China makes ballpoint pen bearings to supply. Since USA doesn't make TSMC level chips does that also mean USA cannot? Since Germany doesn't make spaceship does that mean it cannot? South Korea doesn't make drones so does that mean it cannot?

BTW the ballpoint pen fallacy is a funny one to choose the material for engines is a better example.

But on that case China finished WS-10 in around 2008. It then created improvements once it mastered single crystal blade technology and all the super alloy materials used for engines. No one taught us, we didn't buy them, we didn't steal that because you cannot simply make them from hearing about how it is made. It is through decades of research and trial and error. We made engines license produced since 1970s. Rocket and aircraft.

Now the WS-10 engine has about 2000 hours mean time between overhaul, equal or better than Al-31 was the required standard. It isn't as good as western engines but improvement from past. WS-10 has served on J-11B for 10 years now and has for several years been used on single engine J-10.

So Turkey and some fanboys are feeling confident and telling us China sucks and we are better. Well you haven't even gone above 0 yet. Stop being so arrogant and dismissive of others who at least have many decades of similar experience you have not even done. Saying your country is full of good metal workers is stupid comment. You don't have the three main super alloy technologies. While we had those for decades and some in recent years. We have laser drilling and hollow blade technology you haven't even started touching the basic stuff. Telling us your crazy delusion doesn't make true. Telling us how shit people you don't like are also doesn't make it true.
I like this part, WE ARE DIFFERENT! Mr Turkreal. :agree:

They ARE very different!

They are much worse, almost no experience. Definitely not the industry for heavy turbofan. Never made a single one. Never even made license full turbofan produced. No materials technology, no FADEC or digital control technology and experience. No single product that has provided even a year of service not to mention more than one generation of product near completion.

They are still arrogant and dismissive. So yes they are definitely different. But don't worry Turks are super human and chinks like us are less despite every evidence showing opposite. They are good metal workers don't forget.
 
.
You turks say you are better than us because you believe in your race or culture being better.

Yet you have not even done it and you are telling us you can do it. To present evidence you use BusinessInsider on J-20 article which is like North Korean reporting on USA. Okay.

Then the three core technology areas you get wrong and BI also gets wrong. We didn't make ballpoint pen bearings in the past not because we cannot but because these things are just made in a few countries because of economics. Since that news came out three years ago, China makes ballpoint pen bearings to supply. Since USA doesn't make TSMC level chips does that also mean USA cannot? Since Germany doesn't make spaceship does that mean it cannot? South Korea doesn't make drones so does that mean it cannot?

BTW the ballpoint pen fallacy is a funny one to choose the material for engines is a better example.

But on that case China finished WS-10 in around 2008. It then created improvements once it mastered single crystal blade technology and all the super alloy materials used for engines. No one taught us, we didn't buy them, we didn't steal that because you cannot simply make them from hearing about how it is made. It is through decades of research and trial and error. We made engines license produced since 1970s. Rocket and aircraft.

Now the WS-10 engine has about 2000 hours mean time between overhaul, equal or better than Al-31 was the required standard. It isn't as good as western engines but improvement from past. WS-10 has served on J-11B for 10 years now and has for several years been used on single engine J-10.

So Turkey and some fanboys are feeling confident and telling us China sucks and we are better. Well you haven't even gone above 0 yet. Stop being so arrogant and dismissive of others who at least have many decades of similar experience you have not even done. Saying your country is full of good metal workers is stupid comment. You don't have the three main super alloy technologies. While we had those for decades and some in recent years. We have laser drilling and hollow blade technology you haven't even started touching the basic stuff. Telling us your crazy delusion doesn't make true. Telling us how shit people you don't like are also doesn't make it true.
Don't take his word seriously, he is still a child.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom