What's new

Test Explode the HYDROGEN BOMB

Status
Not open for further replies.


No offense Dear, I know it sounds like Real FICTION but its true. Pakistani cold tests are Enough to prove the Effectiveness of Hydrogen Bombs. [/B]There are LASERS which can be used as WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION and they can be mounted on Satellites or Aircrafts.[/B] But due to High International criticism and Opposition They were not able to procure their projects.

LOL. Do u even have any idea of what you are talking about. If u deploy a laser in space powerful enough to be called a weapon of mass destruction, do u even know what is going to power it. It will have to be a space station a kilometre in size.Too much star wars and command & conquer for you boy.

Even Britain is testing a 1.5billion pounds trigger like the above post. Are u going to use a 1.5billion trigger the size of a small city inside a hydrogen bomb.
India tested a thermonuclear device during pokhran II.



Anyways, FYI, Liquid Nitrogen is used by COMPANIES to test and not gamers. Normal folk use water cooling. It is deemed DANGEROUS for consumers and is a banned product. Only companies and colleges are authorised to use it. Haven't you learned anything from terminator 2.
 
.
More info on the HELEN and ORION LASERS.

BBC NEWS | UK | Inside the UK's nuclear weapons bunker


Behind rings of intimidating barbed wire fences in a corner of Berkshire lies a facility which, on the surface, looks like a throwback to the 1950s.

But go inside the vintage buildings and you will find some of the UK's most cutting edge science.

The 10-minute safety presentation for visitors makes it abundantly clear that you are not entering a normal government site.

As well as the standard guidance about fire alarms, there's also information on what to do in the event of a "criticality alert" as well as warnings about lasers, beryllium and the presence of armed police.

The Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) in Aldermaston is one of the most secure sites in Britain for a reason - it has been the sole repository for the UK's atomic warhead capability for more than 50 years.


The output of the laser facility will be more than the electrical output of the entire planet for the period it is operating - but that is only a tiny fraction of a second
Dr Brian Bowsher
Deep inside the heart of the sprawling 700-acre (280ha) site is a secure bunker containing plutonium for Britain's nuclear warheads.

Lying around it is what feels like a small town which exists to service Britain's nuclear arsenal using the latest science.

AWE is responsible for designing, building, maintaining and decommissioning Britain's nuclear warheads - this includes maintaining the capability to build a replacement for Trident should the order be given from the government.

The main challenge for AWE is to be able to guarantee the safety and performance of Britain's warheads when it is no longer possible to test the devices underground.

Hi-tech specifications

Doing this requires some pretty fancy science and our visit focused on one particular aspect - plasma physics and the use of lasers to understand the behaviour of materials at high temperatures and pressures such as those found in a nuclear weapon.

The Helen laser sits in an ageing building which feels as though it dates from the period around World War II when the site was an airfield.

In a small control room, technicians wearing protective suits (to keep dust away from the £30,000 glass lenses) sit at a large terminal as the laser charges.

After a countdown that builds expectation, the actual firing is anti-climactic for the casual observer - no great flashes or sounds or even anything in particular to see.

But what has happened in the adjacent room which houses the laser is remarkable.

The cost of the electricity to charge the system is about 10p.

But by concentrating the energy over a fraction of a second and on a tiny space, the power generated by the laser is more than that of the entire electrical output of the UK.

The new Orion facility being built to replace Helen will be 10 times more powerful, replicating even more closely the environment within a nuclear warhead.

Huge output

"The amount of energy in the laser is relatively modest," explains Dr Brian Bowsher, Director for Research and Applied Science.

"Only enough to heat up a cup of coffee by a few degrees. Our trick is that we'll deliver that energy in a tiny, tiny amount of time, a million millionth of a second and concentrate it in a tiny area.


"That generates huge power densities. In fact, the output of the laser facility will be more than the electrical output of the entire planet for the period it is operating - but that is only a tiny fraction of a second."

The new Orion facility under construction
The new Orion facility will be even more powerful than Helen
The laser fires on to a tiny target, typically weighing about 50 micrograms, whose behaviour is examined in excruciating detail.

Other work done at the site includes the study of hydrodynamics, radiochemistry, forensic seismology and the use of some of the most advanced super-computers.

The advanced science can have spin-offs.

It was scientists from Aldermaston who were the first to establish that the former Russian security officer Alexander Litvinenko had been poisoned in London by the rare, radioactive Isotope Polonium 210 - a discovery which allowed the police to follow a contamination trail and build their case.

Continuous testing

Nuclear weapons are the core business of AWE. Trident is due to last into the 2020s but continued testing is vital, according to Dr Bowsher.

"You might think of it a bit like your Formula 1 car: you don't want to turn it on after 30 years and hope that it works.

"You want to test it continually to make sure you understand the effect of age and various other changes of materials to ensure that the tried and tested meets the safety criteria."

The new Orion laser is being built in an incongruously modern curved structure on the edge of the site.

It is the largest investment in a physics facility the UK has ever made and should be ready by 2010.

If the government gives the go ahead, it will be used not just to test the current Trident system but also to develop Britain's new nuclear weapons system, a decision which would keep the scientists at Aldermaston busy for many years to come.






So something that uses more power than the entire world can only heat a cup of coffee only by a few degrees. Did you get my point???????

And you expect it to blow up a city.ROFLMAO:rofl:

New space based WMD!!!!!!!!!
We will heat your cuppa in 1 second or less!!!!!:rofl:
 
Last edited:
.
There are many things which sound like Fiction like.

1. There is a cutting machine which uses WATER to cut Steel.

I can give you so many thing like that but you wont believe them.

Water jet cutters existed since the 1970s. Whats so FICTIONAL about them. How else do u think tools like spanners are made?

I can give you so many thing like that but you wont believe them.
You give examples of technologies in the 70s and say I wont believe them.:tsk::tsk:


Try using GOOGLE. It will help better.:disagree:
 
.
Pakistan can carry out the said explosion within days of the political word GO. The device would indeed be a bomb-bomb version whereby fusion be generated via fission explosion. The preferred site for this explosion will be the Arabian Sea (an initial excercise and location earmarking has already been carried out to this effect) similar to the effect like the site for Pakistan's 1996 explosions were selected in early 1970's.

However Pakistan potential in military LASERS (although maybe not to the level of initiating a fusion reaction) has gone beyond the level of development to the likes of the US and Israel. Lasers in the very near future would be our best defense in case of worst offense.
 
.
Pakistan can carry out the said explosion within days of the political word GO. The device would indeed be a bomb-bomb version whereby fusion be generated via fission explosion. The preferred site for this explosion will be the Arabian Sea (an initial excercise and location earmarking has already been carried out to this effect) similar to the effect like the site for Pakistan's 1996 explosions were selected in early 1970's.

However Pakistan potential in military LASERS (although maybe not to the level of initiating a fusion reaction) has gone beyond the level of development to the likes of the US and Israel. Lasers in the very near future would be our best defense in case of worst offense.


All those great Lasers in US and Israel have failed. None of them are actually used for combat. The THEL is a failure. It cant even stop a scud.


The preferred site for this explosion will be the Arabian Sea


There has never been a sea based nuclear test in history. The contamination will destroy the world.

Its not 1996. Its 1998.

At 1970 Pak did not even have a nuclear reactor. all of pak nuclear activities started in 1972.
 
.
All those great Lasers in US and Israel have failed. None of them are actually used for combat. The THEL is a failure. It cant even stop a scud.

There has never been a sea based nuclear test in history. The contamination will destroy the world.

Its not 1996. Its 1998.

At 1970 Pak did not even have a nuclear reactor. all of pak nuclear activities started in 1972.

Right..............thanks for the update! As I said, we are further up the laser department then Israel and US. Enough said!

Second...........The US carried out a thermonuclear explosion in the late 50's or early 60's under the sea near some Atol in the Pacific (sorry did not have the time to Google the exact details), so it has been indeed done in history. Sea Based thermonuclear tests are as safe as land based tests as long as you do it well under the sea-bed using modern day deep sea drilling methods.

Third.............Pakistan did not need a reactor or even a bomb in early 70's to choose the Chaghi test site well in advance in Baluchistan.....its just called prudent planning!

Fourth...........Sorry for the typo......1998 it is!
 
.
Right..............thanks for the update! As I said, we are further up the laser department then Israel and US. Enough said!

Second...........The US carried out a thermonuclear explosion in the late 50's or early 60's under the sea near some Atol in the Pacific (sorry did not have the time to Google the exact details), so it has been indeed done in history. Sea Based thermonuclear tests are as safe as land based tests as long as you do it well under the sea-bed using modern day deep sea drilling methods.

Third.............Pakistan did not need a reactor or even a bomb in early 70's to choose the Chaghi test site well in advance in Baluchistan.....its just called prudent planning!

Fourth...........Sorry for the typo......1998 it is!



Sigh!!! Good for you!:enjoy:
 
.
FYI, Bikini Atol had only atmospheric tests. No sea based tests have occured.
 
.
Sigh!!! Good for you!:enjoy:

Good luck buddy, you don't believe this stuff alright i don't want to beat around the bush :hitwall:.

I said before If u don't have the information about something that doesn't mean that, that thing does not Exist. You are right, your common sense and logic cannot digest this stuff its up to you, there is nothing i can do.. Do you think you can find anything on GOOGLE.

Regarding liquid nitrogen,.. search on youtube and you will see GAMERS using this so called "Dangerous" and terminator movie stuff technology. It is dangerous but if you handle it carefully there is nothing wrong in it. Search on youtube about making an Ice cream with liquid Nitrogen in less then a minute.

India never believed that Pakistan can make an atomic bomb even until 28th May 1998 and all the Indian Intelligence agencies said
PAKISTAN IS BLUFFING
.

India was taken by Surprise when Pakistan tested it Cruise missile, India could not even image that Pakistan can master such a technology.

So dear what i would like to say is You will come across one more surprise from Pakistan if India will test a Hydrogen bomb (Or it will test it again if it has tested it Earlier as you say so in Pokhran II)..
 
.
Water jet cutters existed since the 1970s. Whats so FICTIONAL about them. How else do u think tools like spanners are made?


You give examples of technologies in the 70s and say I wont believe them.:tsk::tsk:


Try using GOOGLE. It will help better.:disagree:

I have got a proof now Thanks GOD.

Laser fusion

Laser fusion, also called inertial confinement fusion, is the most frequent fusion reaction on Earth. It is commonly used for experiments relevant to hydrogen bombs. Is relatively simple and cheap in comparison to tokamaks but didn’t allow continuous fusion and can be ignited discontinuously only.
Basic principle


In laser fusion there is hydrogen fuel consisted of deuterium and tritium enclosed in golden tube under high pressure and low temperatures (ones of Kelvin). To initiate fuse ultraviolet laser is pointed at the tube.Tube starts to produce large amount of x-rays that quickly heats stored hydrogen, mainly outer layers.
Those explode and press inner layers enough to ignite nuclear fusion.

It is almost the same as fusion in hydrogen bomb where fission bomb ignites fusion of small amount of hydrogen.

Laser fusion laboratories

Thanks to similarity to hydrogen bomb explosion, is laser fusion in centre of focus of military science, especially when nuclear test are prohibited by international agreements. Only 15 % of experiments are reserved to energetic research, the rest is military. Scientists study conditions of explosions to make better numerical models of destroying power of hydrogen bombs. There are two big laboratories in the world. One in USA calls National Ignition Facility Project (NIF) and the other in France calls Laser Mégajoule (LMJ). We have no choice but to hope that new more efficient methods to initiate fusion via laser, will be used rather in energetics than in military.

Please Follow this link and see more details because pictures are also presented for better Presentation.

Nuclear fusion - Laser fusion

Talk about fiction now.. So i think i win this argument.
 
. .
LOL. Everybody knows about laser fusion. Its not big a deal. What you claimed was Laser to ignite a thermo nuclear explosion. They are 2 completely different things. There is a hell of a lot more information on wikipedia than what you posted.

Type Inertial Confinement Fusion in wikipedia.

Look at this link

Shiva laser - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The basic idea of any ICF device is to rapidly heat the outer layers of a "target", normally a small plastic sphere containing a few milligrams of fusion fuel, typically a mix of deuterium and tritium. The heat burns the plastic into a plasma, which explodes off the surface. Due to Newton's Third Law, the remaining portion of the target is driven inwards, eventually collapsing into a small point of very high density. The rapid blowoff also creates a shock wave that travels towards the center of the compressed fuel. When it meets itself in the center of the fuel, the energy in the shock wave further heats and compresses the tiny volume around it. If the temperature and density of that small spot is raised high enough, fusion reactions will occur.


These are research reactors. Meaning all the laser action takes place in a confined space and is a fully controlled chain reaction.

They use only a few milligrams of fuel for these experiments.
When you use 200kT or 1 MT, then it is a completely different matter. There is no power source or a credible material that can actually hold the amount of energy required for a successful explosion to take place.


In this experiment the elements are unstable. They are ready to go off at a moments notice. All it needs is a little force from the outside. Thats where a laser comes into picture.

Look at the quote in orange. Only the plastic is burnt and the reaction takes place. After the sentence it refers to Newtons Third Law. The principle is a very simple method to create fusion reaction of a minute scale. It is meant to test table fusion to create cheap energy. This is something like 30 or 40 years from reality.


If u are a gamer, let me know if you played Command & Conquer 3 Tiberium Wars.
 
.
This stuff is not something that can be designed in a day or a year or even a decade. Laser tech is simply too expensive and useless right now.

Weapon testing have been tried but failed. Simply because the laser was not good enough. And this was in massive underground facilities with a laser source that can be as big as 3 or 4 football fields. So, putting it all in a small hollow cylinder is out of the question.

A new laser system called HiPER is being designed by the EU to develop an efficient laser system. But, the building will only start in 2010.


Pure fusion weapon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A pure fusion weapon is a hypothetical hydrogen bomb design that does not need a fission "primary" explosive to ignite the fusion of deuterium and tritium,

Laser ignited Bombs are science fiction. Come back 50 years later and then we can have our little chat again.
 
.
LOL. Everybody knows about laser fusion. Its not big a deal. What you claimed was Laser to ignite a thermo nuclear explosion. They are 2 completely different things. There is a hell of a lot more information on wikipedia than what you posted.

Type Inertial Confinement Fusion in wikipedia.

Look at this link

Shiva laser - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia




These are research reactors. Meaning all the laser action takes place in a confined space and is a fully controlled chain reaction.

They use only a few milligrams of fuel for these experiments.
When you use 200kT or 1 MT, then it is a completely different matter. There is no power source or a credible material that can actually hold the amount of energy required for a successful explosion to take place.


In this experiment the elements are unstable. They are ready to go off at a moments notice. All it needs is a little force from the outside. Thats where a laser comes into picture.

Look at the quote in orange. Only the plastic is burnt and the reaction takes place. After the sentence it refers to Newtons Third Law. The principle is a very simple method to create fusion reaction of a minute scale. It is meant to test table fusion to create cheap energy. This is something like 30 or 40 years from reality.


If u are a gamer, let me know if you played Command & Conquer 3 Tiberium Wars.


You will not get my point, I am done explaining to you, If you can read English properly, Read the whole article again.

The heat burns the plastic into a plasma, which explodes off the surface. Due to Newton's Third Law, the remaining portion of the target is driven inwards, eventually collapsing into a small point of very high density. The rapid blowoff also creates a shock wave that travels towards the center of the compressed fuel. When it meets itself in the center of the fuel, the energy in the shock wave further heats and compresses the tiny volume around it. If the temperature and density of that small spot is raised high enough, fusion reactions will occur.

The fusion reactions release high-energy particles, which collide with the high density fuel around it and slow down. This heats the fuel further, and can potentially cause that fuel to undergo fusion as well. Given the right overall conditions of the compressed fuel – high enough density and temperature – this heating process can result in a chain reaction, burning outward from the center where the shock wave started the reaction. This is a condition known as "ignition", which can lead to a significant portion of the fuel in the target undergoing fusion, and the release of significant amounts of energy.

Do you understand "Ignition" ? Its just a starter and then Everything works like a Falling domino System.

The rapid blowoff also creates a shock wave that travels towards the center of the compressed fuel
.

Now this Blowoff is the main cause of the fusion reaction.and the result is..
fusion reactions will occur

And now at the end

this heating process can result in a chain reaction, burning outward from the center where the shock wave started the reaction. This is a condition known as "ignition", which can lead to a significant portion of the fuel in the target undergoing fusion, and the release of significant amounts of energy.

I hope you know the meaning of "significant" very well.

In the end i would like to say that You can light your cookstove or kitchen stove with a match stick which produces a Flame or you can use an Electric lighter which just produces Just a little Spark but in both cases your kitchen stove will be lit so the difference is your method of approach thats it.

This hydrogen Bomb which i am talking about is designed in such a way that a Significant ignition is produced to start a Nuclear Fusion reaction.

Regarding the games, I don't like command & conquer i love stuff like Call of duty 1,2 and 4. Prince of Persia 1,2 and 3 and Need for speed (all of them)
 
.
LOL. Everybody knows about laser fusion. Its not big a deal. What you claimed was Laser to ignite a thermo nuclear explosion. They are 2 completely different things. There is a hell of a lot more information on wikipedia than what you posted.

Type Inertial Confinement Fusion in wikipedia.

Look at this link

Shiva laser - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia




These are research reactors. Meaning all the laser action takes place in a confined space and is a fully controlled chain reaction.

They use only a few milligrams of fuel for these experiments.
When you use 200kT or 1 MT, then it is a completely different matter. There is no power source or a credible material that can actually hold the amount of energy required for a successful explosion to take place.


In this experiment the elements are unstable. They are ready to go off at a moments notice. All it needs is a little force from the outside. Thats where a laser comes into picture.

Look at the quote in orange. Only the plastic is burnt and the reaction takes place. After the sentence it refers to Newtons Third Law. The principle is a very simple method to create fusion reaction of a minute scale. It is meant to test table fusion to create cheap energy. This is something like 30 or 40 years from reality.


If u are a gamer, let me know if you played Command & Conquer 3 Tiberium Wars.

Before this you said its impossible now you are saying it
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom