What's new

Tensions in Indian city of Ayodhya ahead of Babri Mosque verdict

Dai Toruko

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
2,179
Reaction score
-2
Country
Turkey
Location
Turkey

In the Indian town of Ayodhya, Muslims are feeling under siege as they wait for a Supreme Court ruling on a centuries-old religious dispute that has cast a shadow over their relations with the majority Hindu community. The 16th-century Babri Mosque was destroyed by a Hindu nationalist mob in 1992, triggering one of the deadliest communal riots in the country.
 
.
I have a feeling this will go in favor or Hindus - and Muslims wouldn't be able to do anything and if it goes against Hindu's then you can expect lynching and still expect Muslims to do nothing.

We are dealing with a Nationalist Government in India on religious grounds - Nazi (Germany) were of a different kind they didn't play the religious card.

And let me be clear this has nothing to do with Pakistan as it’s not our property or anything. But this’ll show us if Indian Muslims have resolve or not to right a wrong.
 
Last edited:
. . . .
my pal here wanted o put a Kashmir rally poster at a local muslim owned biryani place in Frisco texas, they did not let him so, stop giving a fcuk about these dallay. Saem thing at this bengladeshi store in dallas area. They only very reluctantly allowed after He threatened them with loss of business from Paksitani community.
 
.
What was point of destroying Mosque build by Babur? Ram isn't historical as nothing but monkeys roamed around in Ayodhiya 10000BC when they claim temple was build.

Hatred of invader? He wasn't first central asian to invade. India speak and follow religion brought in by central asian aryans.

Nothing justify destroying mosque but expect more humiliation of minorities by SC judgement. Which is what Indian muslims deserve for rejecting two nation theory.
 
.
Off-course it will go in the favor of hindu's there country their laws/rules simple as that muslims are second hand citizens there many people don't seem to understand that.
You need to understand the gravity of what we are dealing with here. Despite what you hear and the halo effects at play, things are not as black and white as you think they are regarding this issue.
Ram temple is to hindus what Mecca is to muslims in its symbolic value. A muslim ruler had destroyed (claimed) the temple and built a mosque in its place.
Post-independence, the restablishment seemed like a no brainer to hindus, yet it was never acted upon legally because Indian muslims are as much indian citizens as are hindus (I know things are dangerously close to ruining that harmony right about now), and the judiciary as well as legislation deemed the destruction of even an ordinary mosque built on top of the holiest shrine as unconstitutional.
I know that you won't believe it but a lot of Indian muslims want the area to be given to hindus as they appreciate the symbolism. Like most things it has become a rallying cry for getting muslim votes and hence not resolved.

Be honest, what would you have done in a situation like this?

What was point of destroying Mosque build by Babur? Ram isn't historical as nothing but monkeys roamed around in Ayodhiya 10000BC when they claim temple was build.
Mate, mostly it's the symbolism that gets religious sentiments pent up in people. There is so much in all religions that's myth, doesn't stop people from appreciating what the myths symbolise.
Hatred of invader? He wasn't first central asian to invade. India speak and follow religion brought in by central asian aryans.
Nothing justify destroying mosque but expect more humiliation of minorities by SC judgement. Which is what Indian muslims deserve for rejecting two nation theory.
If only the world had more empathy.
 
.
Ram temple is to hindus what Mecca is to muslims in its symbolic value.

Then why wait so long to re-establish it?

I know that you won't believe it but a lot of Indian muslims want the area to be given to hindus as they appreciate the symbolism.

Like I said, they're cucked.
 
.
Then why wait so long to re-establish it?
It is not unanimous as the Waqf board and a lot of prominent muslim bodies in India oppose it. There is a reason that LK Advani and almost the entire leadership of BJP was arrested when the masjid was demolished.


Like I said, they're cucked.
No one's cucked. Why did PA withdraw from Kargil? Why isn't PA invading J&K to oust Indian forces?
There are compromises that have to be made for the greater good/in the larger scheme of things.[/QUOTE]
 
.
my pal here wanted o put a Kashmir rally poster at a local muslim owned biryani place in Frisco texas, they did not let him so, stop giving a fcuk about these dallay. Saem thing at this bengladeshi store in dallas area. They only very reluctantly allowed after He threatened them with loss of business from Paksitani community.

I know which Biryani place you are referring to in Frisco..If any of the Kashmir poster is advertised, quite obvious that Indian people will react to it...

You need to understand the gravity of what we are dealing with here. Despite what you hear and the halo effects at play, things are not as black and white as you think they are regarding this issue.
Ram temple is to hindus what Mecca is to muslims in its symbolic value. A muslim ruler had destroyed (claimed) the temple and built a mosque in its place.
Post-independence, the restablishment seemed like a no brainer to hindus, yet it was never acted upon legally because Indian muslims are as much indian citizens as are hindus (I know things are dangerously close to ruining that harmony right about now), and the judiciary as well as legislation deemed the destruction of even an ordinary mosque built on top of the holiest shrine as unconstitutional.
I know that you won't believe it but a lot of Indian muslims want the area to be given to hindus as they appreciate the symbolism. Like most things it has become a rallying cry for getting muslim votes and hence not resolved.

Be honest, what would you have done in a situation like this?


Mate, mostly it's the symbolism that gets religious sentiments pent up in people. There is so much in all religions that's myth, doesn't stop people from appreciating what the myths symbolise.

If only the world had more empathy.

Your post is quite detail explained...But do you think poster here really care about caring for any one’s religious sentiment except Muslim??
 
.
You need to understand the gravity of what we are dealing with here. Despite what you hear and the halo effects at play, things are not as black and white as you think they are regarding this issue.
Ram temple is to hindus what Mecca is to muslims in its symbolic value. A muslim ruler had destroyed (claimed) the temple and built a mosque in its place.
Post-independence, the restablishment seemed like a no brainer to hindus, yet it was never acted upon legally because Indian muslims are as much indian citizens as are hindus (I know things are dangerously close to ruining that harmony right about now), and the judiciary as well as legislation deemed the destruction of even an ordinary mosque built on top of the holiest shrine as unconstitutional.
I know that you won't believe it but a lot of Indian muslims want the area to be given to hindus as they appreciate the symbolism. Like most things it has become a rallying cry for getting muslim votes and hence not resolved.

Be honest, what would you have done in a situation like this?


Mate, mostly it's the symbolism that gets religious sentiments pent up in people. There is so much in all religions that's myth, doesn't stop people from appreciating what the myths symbolise.

If only the world had more empathy.

There is as much archaeological evidence of the Ram temple existing as there is of a monkey god flying around.

What would we have done?
First, we would not have made up a fairy tale and then used that fairy tale to destroy a 500 year old mosque.

Second, we would re-evaluate our religious philosophy and ask why it causes so much hatred in us.
 
.
There is as much archaeological evidence of the Ram temple existing as there is of a monkey god flying around.

What would we have done?
First, we would not have made up a fairy tale and then used that fairy tale to destroy a 500 year old mosque.

Second, we would re-evaluate our religious philosophy and ask why it causes so much hatred in us.
There is a lot of archaelogical evidence that was dug out..the temple may be 10000 or 1000 year old..thats not what matters..what matters is a masjid was built by demolishing a temple there...Muslim invaders demolished many temples and killed many hindus..I am not creating fictional stories...these are the incidents mentioned proudly by muslim historians...are you ready for a challenge? Shall i paste accounts from those books here? Even qutub minar was built with the help of the bricks of a demolished temple.

Muslim invaders thought it to be a holy deed demolishing pagan temples
 
.
There is a lot of archaelogical evidence that was dug out..the temple may be 10000 or 1000 year old..thats not what matters..what matters is a masjid was built by demolishing a temple there...Muslim invaders demolished many temples and killed many hindus..I am not creating fictional stories...these are the incidents mentioned proudly by muslim historians...are you ready for a challenge? Shall i paste accounts from those books here? Even qutub minar was built with the help of the bricks of a demolished temple.

Muslim invaders thought it to be a holy deed demolishing pagan temples

Oh please, bring on your "challenge"
My only stipulation is that it can't be Hindutva monkey nonsense.

And you are 100% creating fictional stories.
This temple destroying narrative is just a fairy tale for you people to justify your hatred.

In the world where monkey gods don't exists (reality) Mosques, temples, gurdwaras, etc were destroyed by everyone. It was not a religious thing, it was a political one.

Also, Hindu invaders also killed many Hindus AND Muslims, so I fail to see your point.

In the modern world, we only really have examples of Hindus destroying Mosques, where Muslims in Pakistan are restoring temples. That is a fact and that is reality that no one can deny.
 
.
Many mosques in India were Hindu temples but some say the babri was never built on Hindu temple
 
.
Back
Top Bottom