You need to understand the gravity of what we are dealing with here. Despite what you hear and the halo effects at play, things are not as black and white as you think they are regarding this issue.
Ram temple is to hindus what Mecca is to muslims in its symbolic value. A muslim ruler had destroyed (claimed) the temple and built a mosque in its place.
Post-independence, the restablishment seemed like a no brainer to hindus, yet it was never acted upon legally because Indian muslims are as much indian citizens as are hindus (I know things are dangerously close to ruining that harmony right about now), and the judiciary as well as legislation deemed the destruction of even an ordinary mosque built on top of the holiest shrine as unconstitutional.
I know that you won't believe it but a lot of Indian muslims want the area to be given to hindus as they appreciate the symbolism. Like most things it has become a rallying cry for getting muslim votes and hence not resolved.
Be honest, what would you have done in a situation like this?
Mate, mostly it's the symbolism that gets religious sentiments pent up in people. There is so much in all religions that's myth, doesn't stop people from appreciating what the myths symbolise.
If only the world had more empathy.