What's new

Temple of Religions,Kazan

2137164225_57e375f334_b.jpg

311307029943ce38486bb.jpg

Copyright Stuart-Lee@flickr
4446894554125ab2d32bo.jpg

Mysore Palace, Mysore, Karnataka
Copyright jdhekl73i8@flickr

424694040265320876bab.jpg

Bada Bagh Chhatries (cenotaphs), Jaisalmer, Rajasthan
Copyright timeflicks@flickr

4192013955a2f156f531b.jpg

20467771029fdc80672cb.jpg

Akshardham, New Delhi
Copyright Crystal Karma@flickr

2697988658642e5e7e2o.jpg

119887570d4f36678do.jpg


3932296824d4ee9c0423o.jpg

Copyright abhay25in@flickr
31471962208fca43cf8do.jpg
 
.
Mughals were beaten in a series of battles. Read how the Marathas under the Peshwa was inching towards Delhi, each time they would win against the Mughals, the Mughals would pay them money to prevent their marching further up north. In North India, the Sikhs and Jats had waged a guerrilla war of resistance which diverted nearly all the revenue of the Northern Subas in quelling these rebellions which otherwise could have been spent on administration. Nadir Shah of Iran also beat the Mughals. After suffering so many military defeats, you think it was doing go stay intact?

I have studied "Medieval India" as an academic discipline in a university that comes in top ten public institutes in the United States....You don't need to tell me your fancy stories. I know much better than you.

What I've stated is true. There was no "one" reason for Mughal fall..just like there was no "one" reason for Roman fall..

Superpowers like Mughals or Rome doesn't fall due to just one factor. Yes---to an unprofessional, amateur mind, this might seem the case..but it is actually not.

Marathas only beat Mughals when Mughals ALREADY had declined...At their peak, say in 16th century against Akbar, marathas were nothing more than a dot on moon. Insignificant.

@Hermoine

lol, you can post all the pictures you want..these temples are insignificant when compared to Mughal Architecture.

Tell me, which temple of these even come close to Taj Mahal and its global outreach? Please..
 
.
@AUz
Taj is nothing actually. Its so called global outreach is due to its heavy promotion by the Indian govt and also due to Delhi being the capital of India. A foreigner's first introduction to India is generally via Delhi, and Delhi with its islamic architecture is the starting point for them to explore India, which is where Taj Mahal which is not very far away comes in. Also Indian govt has been far shy talking about or promoting anything Hindu least it be seen as a "Hindu" administration. So in fact Hindu architecture remained untalked about. The fact though remains that foreign tourists spend days together in Varanasi, Haridwar, Hampi, and other assorted Hindu/Jain religious places, but apart from a half day tour of Taj Mahal or Juma Masjid, never never stay over or wander the Islamic places.
 
Last edited:
.
Tell me, which temple of these even come close to Taj Mahal and its global outreach? Please..
Taj Mahal and the Middle ages Hindu Indian structures belong to two entirely different schools of architecture. No comparison at all.
 
.
There are a whole lot of stunning temples and monuments over 2000 years old and intact.
 
.
Your comparing the Taj which is one of the wonders of the world

To old temples dedicated to idol worship? ??

Google world mosques or something to see real stunning architecture
 
.
91186407108b8c15796b.jpg

deepurocks@flickr
261515373517a7b41f4ab.jpg

Murudeshwar, Karnataka
Copyright deepurocks@flickr

26917062231ca38d081ab.jpg

Copyright sricanthtl@flickr
khalsa.jpg

643509334be3cc6c0d7b.jpg

2188577257_1b6926f34d_b.jpg

Hangsheshwari Temple, Bandel, West Bengal
Copyright Soumya...@flickr


264300757000529d83c4b.jpg
4118680347da91459c50b.jpg

Umaid Bhavan Palace, Jodhpur, Rajasthan
Copyright billyvian@flickr
 
. .
95633048727fe78ac8ab.jpg

Girnar Hills, Junagadh, Gujarat
Copyright tim_mosley@flickr

348911878720c521bc7b.jpg

COpyright Pardeshi@flickr
1124516749fc14e7dc7do.jpg

Copyright zoomrohan@flickr
4425002751736806330bb.jpg

Copyright Radicaladam@flickr
dsc0259mf.jpg

Copyright trupti@picasaweb


231243099065175a3367b.jpg

Copyright rictofire@flickr
2750001111f13334ca57b.jpg

Munnar, Kerala
Copyright Mandava Harsha Vardhan@flickr

JcbTRI0.jpg

Kopeshwar Temple, Khidrapur, Maharashtra
Copyright Gaju Mutalik@flickr
 
. . . .
I have studied "Medieval India" as an academic discipline in a university that comes in top ten public institutes in the United States....You don't need to tell me your fancy stories. I know much better than you.

What I've stated is true. There was no "one" reason for Mughal fall..just like there was no "one" reason for Roman fall..

Superpowers like Mughals or Rome doesn't fall due to just one factor. Yes---to an unprofessional, amateur mind, this might seem the case..but it is actually not.

Marathas only beat Mughals when Mughals ALREADY had declined...At their peak, say in 16th century against Akbar, marathas were nothing more than a dot on moon. Insignificant.

@Hermoine

lol, you can post all the pictures you want..these temples are insignificant when compared to Mughal Architecture.

Tell me, which temple of these even come close to Taj Mahal and its global outreach? Please..
It is subjective. To you these temples are distasteful/disgusting and probably even an incentive to destroy them and replace them with some other structure. But to us these are more beautiful. Besides Taj architecture is not Islamic at all. For Islamic structures - you can look at the Jama Masjid, Quatul Islam Mosque etc - massive and fascinating structures indeed, but I like the Hampi temples. The ruins of our Martand temple(close to where I live) is also still beautiful. Like I said - it is subjective.
 
. .
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom