Taliban to reward suicide bombers’ families with cash, land: Interior Minister Sirajuddin Haqqani

[Goritoes]

Suicide is Haram, and must not be encourage...

 

[Itachi]

Suicide is Haram, and must not be encourage...

Suicide isn't haram in warfare.....please learn to differentiate...

I clearly remember learning about our brave jawans laying in front of Indian tanks at the Battle of Chawinda. No one cared to tell them that suicide is haram?? Or the book writers who wrote that book for Pakistani school children?

 

[Goritoes]

Suicide isn't haram in warfare.....please learn to differentiate...

I clearly remember learning about our brave jawans laying in front of Indian tanks at the Battle of Chawinda. No one cared to tell them that suicide is haram?? Or the book writers who wrote that book for Pakistani school children?

Suicide is Haram according to Quran, and there is no if's and but's here...as for that Chawinda laying in front of tanks is all BS stories made by likes of Zaid hamid.

 

[Aesterix]

Same as pur judiciary decided so many times to release the terrorists and let them live a normal life , while their victims and their families lives will never be the same.

 

[Adecypher]

Total civilian deaths in these wars (vast majority by Coalition violence) are between 335,000 and 1,000,000. Let that sink in.

Sir, I tried so many times but “sinking process” always failed because either there is no space left to sink in or the storage device itself is non existent…

 

[Itachi]

Suicide is Haram according to Quran, and there is no if's and but's here...as for that Chawinda laying in front of tanks is all BS stories made by likes of Zaid hamid.

The stories of Chawinda were written in books sold to Pakistani schools lol.....where does Zaid Hamid come into this??

And suicide bombing is a legitimate form of warfare. Go read up on it. Or keep harping about "halal haram", as if you care in the first place.

 

[Adecypher]

Suicide is Haram according to Quran, and there is no if's and but's here...as for that Chawinda laying in front of tanks is all BS stories made by likes of Zaid hamid.

So in a scenario where a soldier have “no choice” giving the circumstances of the war that is fighting against a very technologically advanced enemy he is “not allowed” to give his life to defend his homeland … ?

 

[Irfan Baloch]

Westerners are freaking out after US aerial bombings have killed more than 22,000 CIVILIANS since 9/11. It's okay to drop a bomb that kills civilians but not be a suicide bomber against an invading force that has occupied your country?

Total civilian deaths in these wars (vast majority by Coalition violence) are between 335,000 and 1,000,000. Let that sink in.

just before leaving Americans slaughtered an innocent family through a drone strike and refused to initially accept the mistake that their target was not Daesh.

I am not condoning the suicide bombings by Afghan Taliban that did result in collateral damage as well but this is what they had as best in a war that Americans themselves preach in their documentaries and interviews that everything is fair as long as they are doing it to others.

 

[Sayfullah]

Suicide bombing is like a poor man’s airforce

(P.S. I don’t support bombing of innocents)

 

[Xestan]

Pictures from the ceremony

Ministry of Interior Affairs press release:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1450410065865887746

Official Spokesman:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1450759675771764736

https://twitter.com/x/status/1450429965208522753

 

[Adonis]

Japanese govt still honors kamakaze pilots and have dedicated a peace museum for them. just saying.

So you are comparing state soldiers to bunch of terrorists.....

It's like if TTP , start rewarding their suicide cadre killed during attacks on Pakistan army (Zarb-e Azb or Rad-ul- Fasad)...or ISIS does to theirs in Syrian war etc....

Per your logic, what if the difference between a good and bad then?

 

[Silverblaze]

So you are comparing state soldiers to bunch of terrorists.....

It's like if TTP , start rewarding their suicide cadre killed during attacks on Pakistan army (Zarb-e Azb or Rad-ul- Fasad)...or ISIS does to theirs in Syrian war etc....

Per your logic, what if the difference between a good and bad then?

Japanese soldiers were called war criminals by allies, they were in the same camp as nazis.

Question is how do you define good and bad?

For instance, if Viet Cong was bad according to US, why are Contras in nicargua good? Why are Afghan Taliban bad but Syrian rebels fighting Assad are good?

Problem is that US sees its enemies as ideological adversaries and anything they do it is inherently bad. However, if groups who are ideologically aligned with US do similar things they are ok.

Example is war against USSR in Afghanistan. Mujahideen fully supported by the US committed suicide attacks against Soviets and Afghan communist govt at that time the only difference is they were called human bombs.

There is no black and white in this scenario. It is simply tragic.

 

[R Wing]

just before leaving Americans slaughtered an innocent family through a drone strike and refused to initially accept the mistake that their target was not Daesh.

I am not condoning the suicide bombings by Afghan Taliban that did result in collateral damage as well but this is what they had as best in a war that Americans themselves preach in their documentaries and interviews that everything is fair as long as they are doing it to others.

Exactly --- the point is that the West is in no moral position to be shocked at any of this. Many of its special operators were treating the war as a hunting competition.

 

[Goritoes]

The stories of Chawinda were written in books sold to Pakistani schools lol.....where does Zaid Hamid come into this??

And suicide bombing is a legitimate form of warfare. Go read up on it. Or keep harping about "halal haram", as if you care in the first place.

Pakistani school books have no credibility when it comes to Quran, and if you believe in those stories you must also believe that Army on white horses were fighting as well..

So in a scenario where a soldier have “no choice” giving the circumstances of the war that is fighting against a very technologically advanced enemy he is “not allowed” to give his life to defend his homeland … ?

Doesn't matter if enemy is powerful or weak, Quran is specific about the topic, you have a problem go fight/argue with Allah not me.

 

[Adecypher]

Doesn't matter if enemy is powerful or weak, Quran is specific about the topic, you have a problem go fight/argue with Allah not me.

Oh bhai merey Taliban fighter is not hanging himself with rope to a fan in a room and committing suicide because he lost all hope or "umeed" from the rehamat of Allah SWT regarding his situation rather he is happily giving his life performing an offensive act which due to circumstances involves making himself as a weapon (an effective one)....do you see the difference...