What's new

Taliban Tells Turkey Continued Troop Presence in Afghanistan Is 'Unacceptable'

Homajon

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
1,206
Reaction score
1
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Location
Germany
Taliban Tells Turkey Continued Troop Presence in Afghanistan Is 'Unacceptable'

By Ayaz Gul

Updated June 18, 2021 12:40 PM

ISLAMABAD - The Taliban said Friday its leaders already had conveyed to Turkey their opposition to any foreign troops remaining in Afghanistan after the U.S. and NATO forces leave the war-torn country by a September 11 deadline.

The insurgent group’s statement comes a day after U.S. officials said President Joe Biden and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan agreed in their meeting Monday that Turkey would continue providing security at the international airport in Kabul, the Afghan capital, following the troop pullout.

“The clear commitment from the leaders was established that Turkey would play a lead role in securing Hamid Karzai International Airport, and we are now working through how to execute to get to that," Jake Sullivan, Biden’s national security adviser, told reporters Thursday.

Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid, when asked for a response to Sullivan’s comments, told VOA that guarding the airports and other locations in the country is the responsibly of Afghans.

“If foreign forces want to retain a military presence here in the name of airport security, Afghans will not allow it and will view them as invaders, be it Turkey or any other country,” Mujahid told VOA.

He insisted the Taliban maintain “diplomatic ties” with Turkey and seek “brotherly” relations with the Islamic country.

“In recent meetings and discussions with Turkish diplomats they had shared with us [Turkey’s] proposed continued military presence here, but we told them it was unacceptable for us. And they assured us that our stance will be conveyed to their leadership,” Mujahid said.

He added that Turkey and America can discuss their bilateral issues, but it is for Afghans alone to decide on how to conduct their "internal affairs and expect others to respect it.”

Turkey has about 500 troops stationed in Afghanistan as part of a NATO-led non-combatant military mission in the country and has long provided security for the airport.

Kabul airport security is crucial for the working of diplomatic missions in Afghanistan amid concerns intensified hostilities between the Taliban and Afghan forces could plunge the country into another round of civil war following the withdrawal.

The Taliban previously also has expressed opposition to any foreign military presence in post-withdrawal Afghanistan. Sullivan, however, dismissed those assertions, saying Biden and Erdogan tasked their teams to work together to finalize the proposed security plan.

“We do not believe that what the Taliban has said publicly should or will deter the efforts underway right now to establish that security presence, which in turn will enable international missions —diplomatic missions to operate,” Sullivan said.

Australia, which has roughly 80 remaining troops in Afghanistan announced the sudden closure of its diplomatic mission in Kabul earlier this month.

US-Taliban deal

The U.S.-led military drawdown, which formally began on May 1, is stemming from an agreement Washington negotiated with the Taliban in February 2020, to end nearly 20 years of American involvement in the Afghan war.

The Taliban say Turkey’s plans to guard and run the Kabul airport will be a violation of the U.S.-Taliban deal. Peace talks between Kabul and the Taliban, however, which resulted in the deal, have had little success and have mostly been stalled, with each side blaming the other for the deadlock.

Russia also endorsed Friday the Taliban’s assertions. Russian media quoted Moscow’s presidential envoy for Afghanistan, Zamir Kabulov, as saying that Turkey’s proposed plans run counter to the U.S.-Taliban agreement. “Of course, this is a violation," Kabulov said.

Taliban advances

The Taliban also have stepped up attacks and made significant battlefield gains across the country since the foreign troop withdrawal started, capturing fully or partially more than two dozen districts.

Mainstream Afghan TV channel Arian News reported Friday the insurgents have seized control of 37 districts in the past month or so.

Afghan forces have launched counteroffensives to regain the lost territory, leaving scores of combatants dead on both sides. The Defense Ministry claimed Friday that Afghan forces had killed nearly 300 insurgents across different provinces in the last 24 hours.

The Taliban also made similar claims of inflicting heavy casualties on government forces, and it released videos on its social media platforms showing scores of Afghan forces surrendering to the insurgents or joining their ranks.

Both Afghan rivals routinely issue inflated claims about the fighting, which are difficult to verify from independent sources and the real situation remains unclear.

The increase in hostilities also is inflicting casualties on Afghan civilians, who have borne the brunt of the long conflict.

 
Turks should station their troops in North and Western areas where their presence will be welcomed. They can work with ethnic militias to prevent Kuchi and Talib incursions. Let the Talibs have a tiny statelet in South East of the country where they remain dependent on us.
 
Taliban are more sensible and logical here. It's the afghans who fought against foreign invaders and defeated them with their blood,sweat and love for the motherland (ANA scums excluded) . So it's the afghans who have a right to rule every single inch of afghanistan. No more foreign control of any kind and that too of a NATO member. No way.
Turks should station their troops in North and Western areas where their presence will be welcomed. They can work with ethnic militias to prevent Kuchi and Talib incursions. Let the Talibs have a tiny statelet in South East of the country where they remain dependent on us.
Whatever our relationships with turkey are ,that won't let me stop from speaking a truth.
Did Turks contributed anything to liberate afghanistan from invaders? What's their contribution in afghanistan of any kind? They should know establishing a military presence in Afghanistan of kind amounts to invasion.
If pakistan a country which suffered the most because of what happened in afghanistan and contributed to it's liberation both militarily and financially is not asking for any kind of a base overthere ,what chance turkey or any other country has then .
 
Last edited:
Definitely new type of ''taliban'' made in Afghanistan mutually occupied by US, Iran and India.
I see tough days ahead for Pakistan.
The question is why Turkey wants to station it's army in AFG? what's the agenda?
Good question...
 
I can see China arming Taliban with HJ-12 missiles to shoot Turkish tanks in Afghanistan for harboring Uyghur separatists in Turkey.


Uyghurs are declared non Muslims by Khumeni. So now, even ANA can support you for that matter.
 
Try your luck with IMAFT. You may get a little progress on it.
 
Not a sane idea to keep an armed contingent there if the locals arent happy with that .However if the Turkish regime is genuinely considering to extend a helping hand in Afghan development why not talk with the stake holders (iea) and let them provide security for such projects?
 
As i have been saying here, the taliban actually hate turks because of their NATO membership and helping the occupiers even if in non combat aspects. Pakistan have conveyed the same message to Turkey. But it seems Turkey is more focused on something from US and think staying in Afghanistan will be easy. They will realize the harsh truth soon. Post 11 sep deadline, if turks stayed, the first foreign casualty will be turkish soldiers.
 
Soviets and Americans didn't achieve the military objectives in Afghanistan, Turkey thinks it can do better. ENJOY. LOL, enjoy trying to impose law and order in that terrain with people who prefer Taliban.
 
Back
Top Bottom