1) When you say 'High Level' that usually means I'm included and trust me, I have yet to see a shred of evidence from the Indian side. The BLA claims are made because Baramdagh lives in Switzerland on an Indian passport, what more proof do you want of official Indian involvement?
Lets get this straight, Hamid Gul hasn't seen the ISI office in 3 decades, do you really think that he is up to date about Pakistan's interaction with the Taliban? Khalid Khwaja and Col. Imam thought they knew the Taliban too well and ended up dying at their hands. These retirees are trapped in the 80s, pay them no heed.
Secondly, if the Taliban were our proxy army, the TTP wouldn't have been using their lands as a springboard for launching attacks on Pakistan.
With 'High level' i don't mean common people like you and me. I mean higher up the government.
I meant China, leave aside, ISAF,NATO and India. I agree its damn hard to have effective counter terrorist efforts as the terrain itself is the enemy. Hope this news proves my point about the subject in discussion. There are Chinese sources too.(I hope no one will call it Western Propaganda)
China urges Pakistan to expel Uighur Islamic militants
BBC News - China urges Pakistan to expel Uighur Islamic militants
With Hamid Gul, I meant when he was in charge of ISI. Things may have changed, but isn't Pakistan playing the role to bring US and Taliban on same table recently. I really don't care whether they are killed or died, one cannot shut the possibility out that there wasn't any link and possible involvement. Even if proofs are there, we won't be told (these matters are not for public to decide on consensus basis, as it is too complicated to understand). Call it a conspiracy theory, but we won't know the truth. (The word "possibility" generally leads to uncertainty and when foreign policy, national interest and strategic efforts are concerned, civilians are kept in dark, a naive statement but true )
India is not dealing with Taliban but LeT and JuD. US is dealing with Taliban. US distrust started when the terrorists left their positions after US conveyed their information to Pakistan. They blatantly said these things along with proofs( as far as I know, they were shown, don't have the link). India has shown LeT and JuD's connection in terrorism in India, lets forget for Kasab( one may rise the point India didn't allowed Pakistan to interrogate him), in past many incidents were claimed by these groups (i think their claim clears things up).
@Irfan
Agree with you the Pakistan government won't allow any support to any Taliban which may result in deaths of Pakistani people, bad for their image, necessary condition for stability. All we have been saying along is that now Pakistan have one of the biggest victim of Terrorism. The damage TTP has caused and will continue to, may exceed more what ISAF and NATO did.
But there is less of efforts on either side by India or Pakistan to work it out, as a common concern. Talks have resumed just to restart confidence building measures.
Your statement, neither ally nor enemy clarifies itself and point it out that Pakistan should take it seriously because it concerns to NATO with whom you entered WoT and your commitment to uproot terrorism, also it concerns to India, with whom you (we too) wants cordial relationships, increase in trade and what not. For example- The porous boundary between Pakistan and AFG has proved of the critical factor in it, with which we all agree. May be better arrangement can be made to deal with this. Things could be worked it out via more cooperation and joint action.
Also we would like proofs from your side too. And the way you stood against US for apology, should present and stand against it.
In the end, i would say that, one should get out if this POV that , If ISI caught, work of CIA/MOSSAD/RAW, If no involvement of ISI, we told you so, we have been saying all the way long. This also goes to Indian posters, when they question RAW's involvement. Indian posters have the same POV (atleast in general).
Mutual distrust is the only factor which is driving this discussion, and I again say
we might know the truth what happened in this time after 30 years when another ISI/RAW chief retires and tells us the "truth", just like Hamid Gul did.