What's new

Take your fight to Pakistan. Karzai.

yes. Musharraf knows it. If military is scared, then think of corrupt elected politicians.

:) so you are saying in case of India , the Indian military will fight US to show they are not scared ??

politician part yes true
 
.
Strategic interest & security are the two core issues for america!! your logic would take americans to war with NK, Iran, Venezuela, to name a few!!

hmmmm for the word in red your Indian brigadier is denying any strategic word exists here in this case.


for the word security hmmmm what security ?????
 
.
Strategic interest & security are the two core issues for america!! your logic would take americans to war with NK, Iran, Venezuela, to name a few!!

Venezela is the highest oil exporter to USA. NK does not offer anythink, they just need money(read AID) thats why they just chest thump.
 
.
Looks like the death of his cousin has deeply hurt him. We 180 million Pakistanis feel sorry for him.:frown:
 
.
:) so you are saying in case of India , the Indian military will fight US to show they are not scared ??

politician part yes true

Yes, of course. Thats why drones are not flying over India. BTW don't equate Pakistan with India.
 
. .
hmmmm for the word in red your Indian brigadier is denying any strategic word exists here in this case.


for the word security hmmmm what security ?????

God Bless.

By using the word 'strategic', the world and everything opens up?

Well, I am done with this since it is mere unintelligent and bogus timepass that you are indulging in.

Makes no sense to me, so what can one respond.

Do forgive me for not participating in your juvenile timepass.

Zapata!
 
.
hmmmm for the word in red your Indian brigadier is denying any strategic word exists here in this case.


for the word security hmmmm what security ?????

Strategic interest can be achieved with phone call, why would any one sends navy/
 
.
then you can explain why 20,000 americans are here?
 
. . .
Yes, of course. Thats why drones are not flying over India. BTW don't equate Pakistan with India.

:disagree::disagree::disagree: surely am not equating for you cant stand in such a situation in the first place.

anyway my question again if tomorrow as according to your own criteria US takes out anyone who challenges her then in case of India if US feels you are challenging her and she takes you out what is your position on that ? for how long you are going to sustain and whom do you think is going to side with you ?
 
.
hmmmm for the word in red your Indian brigadier is denying any strategic word exists here in this case.


for the word security hmmmm what security ?????

my response was to mike's post regarding americans confronting whoever challenges them. not specific to the topic discussed here. well.. now that i'm dragged into this.. americans did invade afghan in the name of security, for which ur country become a willing partner. however, the equation has now changed due to geo political & strategical compulsions of many countries involved in afghanistan.
 
.
God Bless.

By using the word 'strategic', the world and everything opens up?

Well, I am done with this since it is mere unintelligent and bogus timepass that you are indulging in.

Makes no sense to me, so what can one respond.

Do forgive me for not participating in your juvenile timepass.

Zapata!

strategic importance maybe your sore spot...we didnt know....
 
.
God Bless.

By using the word 'strategic', the world and everything opens up?

Well, I am done with this since it is mere unintelligent and bogus timepass that you are indulging in.

Makes no sense to me, so what can one respond.

Do forgive me for not participating in your juvenile timepass.

Zapata!

Brigadier read this entire thread and the reality of your own unintelligent and bogus timepass will dawn upon you . infact its you who have started the timepass here.

if you have any logical input then do enlightened us we will be happy to gain knowledge from you until then :lazy:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom