Taiwan to boost forces in disputed Spratly Islands

[NiceGuy]

I personally would like to see a diplomatic and peaceful resolution to China and Vietnam's dispute over Spratly Islands in the South China Sea. Military action should definitely be the last option. Perhaps, China and Vietnam can compromise with both countries taking ownership and control of some of the islands.

China being the greater power here should resist temptation for war with Vietnam, it doesn't serve Asian interest.

Spratly Islands can not negotiate , coz they belong to us, we can not share our fore father land to any one, coz if we share, they will ask for More, we sorry to say that, .^^.

Now USA allow us to enrich Uranium, if China nuke us, we nuke back, both die, USA win, but no choice for Vnese .^^

 

[Martian2]

Spratly Islands can not negotiate , coz they belong to us, we can not share our fore father land to any one, coz if we share, they will ask for More, we sorry to say that, .^^.

Now USA allow us to enrich Uranium, if China nuke us, we nuke back, both die, USA win, but no choice for Vnese .^^

You're incredibly ignorant. Vietnam is a signatory to the Non Proliferation Treaty. You are not permitted to possess nuclear weapons of any type (e.g. atomic or thermonuclear).

Anyway, first you have to develop atomic weapons. Secondly, you have to develop delivery vehicles. You have neither. Long before either event, China would impose a worldwide economic and military embargo and/or level any nuclear weapons facilities in Vietnam.

This is my last response if you post fantasy again. No one discusses Vietnamese with atomic weapons, because it's prohibited by the NPT. More importantly, China will not permit it.

On this military forum, members discuss probable (even unlikely) scenarios. However, we don't discuss crazy ideas like Taiwan (e.g. had a nuclear program; technically-capable; stopped in its tracks by the United States) or Vietnam with nuclear weapons.

 

[NiceGuy]

You're incredibly ignorant. Vietnam is a signatory to the Non Proliferation Treaty. You are not permitted to possess nuclear weapons of any type (e.g. atomic or thermonuclear).

Anyway, first you have to develop atomic weapons. Secondly, you have to develop delivery vehicles. You have neither. Long before either event, China would impose a worldwide economic and military embargo and/or level any nuclear weapons facilities in Vietnam.

This is my last response if you post fantasy again. No one discusses Vietnamese with atomic weapons, because it's prohibited by the NPT. More importantly, China will not permit it.

On this military forum, members discuss probable (even unlikely) scenarios. However, we don't discuss crazy ideas like Taiwan (e.g. had a nuclear program; technically-capable; stopped in its tracks by the United States) or Vietnam with nuclear weapons.

But we have permission to Enrich uranium, that can use to make nuke boom,Korea, Japan can not have this permission .^^.

BTW: coz your friend threaten us with nuclear first, we just want them to know, that useless threatening.^^

 

[below_freezing]

But we have permission to Enrich uranium, that can use to make nuke boom,Korea, Japan can not have this permission .^^.

BTW: coz your friend threaten us with nuclear first, we just want them to know, that useless threatening.^^

There may be accidental spills of nuclear waste from nuclear power plants located on the Red River due to terrorist attack or earthquake. Complete accident. But nuclear waste flows into Vietnam.

 

[NiceGuy]

There may be accidental spills of nuclear waste from nuclear power plants located on the Red River due to terrorist attack or earthquake. Complete accident. But nuclear waste flows into Vietnam.

Yep, for this one, we must control the flow well.^^.

we need help to control the Red river flow from USA,RUSSIA, Japan, India , pls Help !!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[revu]

Yep, for this one, we must control the flow well.^^.

we need help to control the Red river flow from USA,RUSSIA, Japan, India , pls Help !!!!!!!!!!!!

U can't rely on other country, u can only rely on your self to prevent that won't happen.
Other's country wouldn't care much about your people, they only care about your money.

 

[anonymous123]

U can't rely on other country, u can only rely on your self to prevent that won't happen.
Other's country wouldn't care much about your people, they only care about your money.

Lol if i were the United State i would say 1st Vietnam has to become democracy then maybe we will help u