What's new

Taiwan president Tsai Ing-wen in hot water for allegedly forging doctoral dissertation, credentials of UK's LSE

.
> Global Times

You overestimate Taiwan's influence if you think Tsai can collaborate with LSE to forge her PhD lol.

 
.
Ironically, Tsai once boasted to media that her doctoral dissertation was so good that she deserves to get 1.5 PhDs.


According to western freedom and democracy, lying and misleading are part of the deal. Nothing to get work up over it. :enjoy:
> Global Times

You overestimate Taiwan's influence if you think Tsai can collaborate with LSE to forge her PhD lol.

She never Collaborate with LSE. She forge those documents of LSE.
 
.
She never Collaborate with LSE. She forge those documents of LSE.

 
. .

Her PhD supervisor was allegedly Michael Elliot.

The only Michael Elliot I found affiliated with LSE at the time was this man: https://www.weforum.org/people/michael-j-elliott

He does not have a PhD. In fact he does not even have a MS.

In the very thesis you provided, he is referred to as "Mr. Michael Elliot", not "Dr. Michael Elliot", further supporting evidence for the fact that he does not have a PhD.

How does someone with no graduate degree of their own, get the right to supervise someone for a PhD degree?

OK let's just say that he is an extraordinary genius who does not need a graduate degree to be a PhD supervisor (which almost never happens).

A PhD supervisor typically takes on multiple students over their career. Who were his other students? Or was he a so called 1 time professor for a so called 1 time student?


Her committee is also not public knowledge. Why?

Finally... I already caught multiple grammatical errors on the first 3 pages of her supposed thesis.
 
.
Her PhD supervisor was allegedly Michael Elliot.

The only Michael Elliot I found affiliated with LSE at the time was this man: https://www.weforum.org/people/michael-j-elliott

He does not have a PhD. In fact he does not even have a MS.

In the very thesis you provided, he is referred to as "Mr. Michael Elliot", not "Dr. Michael Elliot", further supporting evidence for the fact that he does not have a PhD.

How does someone with no graduate degree of their own, get the right to supervise someone for a PhD degree?

OK let's just say that he is an extraordinary genius who does not need a graduate degree to be a PhD supervisor (which almost never happens).

A PhD supervisor typically takes on multiple students over their career. Who were his other students? Or was he a so called 1 time professor for a so called 1 time student?


Her committee is also not public knowledge. Why?

Finally... I already caught multiple grammatical errors on the first 3 pages of her supposed thesis.

Yeah it's all fake, the clarification on LSE's website is also fake. :lol:
 
.
Yeah it's all fake, the clarification on LSE's website is also fake. :lol:

I don't have any stake in this. Whether it is real or not, doesn't matter to my life. All I have to say is, most real PhDs don't need others to know they have a PhD, so when discrepencies are pointed out, they'd explain and settle the issue - usually a small, easily understood situation - and then the matter is closed.

But, people with something to hide, and those complicit with them, tend to not like it when things get pointed out and have no way to explain, so they attempt to silence.
 
.
Yeah it's all fake, the clarification on LSE's website is also fake. :lol:
Lol.. typical loser who loses the argument will give such response. Fairandunbiased ask some very valid inquiry back by facts. Why so difficult to be answer by you? Maybe the woman lying about her education is hard to be accepted by u? PRC is right must be a blow to haters like u?
 
.
I don't have any stake in this.

Like any of the posters here have any, lmao. If you guys don't believe, so be it. IDGAF too.

Lol.. typical loser who loses the argument will give such response. Fairandunbiased ask some very valid inquiry back by facts. Why so difficult to be answer by you? Maybe the woman lying about her education is hard to be accepted by u? PRC is right must be a blow to haters like u?

Lmao.

Here's what you said:
She never Collaborate with LSE. She forge those documents of LSE.

So Tsai managed to hack into LSE's website and forge? The website wasn't taken down after so long?

What's so valid about his lameass points like grammatical errors or that he can't find the professor on the internet? Difficult for me to answer? I just find it childish to give you guys a proper reply when LSE already came out and clarified the legitimacy of her PhD.

But nooooo, it's fake! LSE's claims can't be corroborated!!!1! There are grammar mistakes spotted! I must be a PRC hater for not believing Tsai forged her PhD!! There must be some sort of conspiracy!

LOL.
 
Last edited:
.
Any one holding public office should understands that they are being scrutinised under a microscope. :coffee:

When Tsai fake her credential she should understand the consequences and humiliation that follows after being discovered and indeed she was exposed.

This is a big news all over.
Why must she claimed she has a PhD when she does not?
Who is forcing her?
Who can she blame?
Why is her thesis not published in the record? Simple.

There was none and so it is considered as fake will be a quick and logical conclusion.
 
.
Like any of the posters here have any, lmao.


Lmao.

Here's what you said:


So Tsai managed to hack into LSE's website and forge? The website wasn't taken down after so long?

What's so valid about his lameass points like grammatical errors or that he can't find the professor on the internet? Difficult for me to answer? I just find it childish to reply you guys when LSE already came out and clarified the legitimacy of her PhD.

But nooooo, it's fake! LSE's claims can't be corroborated!!!1! There are grammar mistakes spotted! I must be a PRC hater for not believing Tsai forged her PhD !! LOL.
LSE part of western regime, order by them to admit the validity of her PhD but loopholes fact like her professor professionalism cannot be covered.
 
.
She's basically the pet project of American institute in Taiwan,she has been collaborating and reporting everything to the US from the American institute for a decade,when you give unabated US access to any region ,this is the result.

There's no difference between her and Joey Siu ,both sociopath with no sense of dignity.
Taiwanese have to be degenerate to believe her despite all the facts proving her systematic lies.How can Taiwanese accept a lying sociopath as president?
 
Last edited:
. .
I have read the statement regarding the Phd from LSE, they would not state something which is not verifiable, it would ruin their reputation around the world. They wouldn't do that for any individual, period.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom