nomi007
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2010
- Messages
- 8,538
- Reaction score
- 8
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You simply copy pasted pictures of mbt 3000 which arrived In december last year 2014 for trials.
Hi,i'll say this again this isn't the answer to the pak armys problems vs india, the pak army need new generation ATGM not 3rd class 1980s HJ-8, they need IFVs, And most importantly they need a proper SAM network, these tanks are just sitting ducks for IAF to take out, without a proper airforce who will support these tanks?
Kickback? Tell me how much we pay in JF17 deal?As we are no longer going to take chinses tanks. Because of certain kickback issues.
1500 hp
Your comments are unwarranted. Both the tanks had different mission profiles.
This is a second hand information, may be some more knowledgeable members would be able to verify it.
The T-64-> T-80 evolution is like a lot of things Russian, an outgrowth of Russian military politics as well as Red Army tradition. The Russians back when they were the Soviets had TWO complimentary tank design bureaus and two design requirements. The Leningrad crowd specialized in complex "breakthrough" tanks while the Uralvagonzavod designed the line of simple "cruiser" attrition warfare tanks.
The result is that we have two tanks that share a lot of superficial features but designed for ostensibly very different missions. As is the trend of the T-34>T-55>T-62>T-72 which is a throwaway tank-designed mainly for general comb and mainly infantry support, the T-80 traces its lineage to a redesign for a a tank that was to fill the operations niche left by the IS and T-10 series of heavy assault tanks.
The T-90 is the improved variant of the '80 once again with most of the bugs ironed out.
That is the basic difference between the two T series tanks, as to which is better, that depends solely upon the crews within the mbt and how well they are drilled.
Kickback? Tell me how much we pay in JF17 deal?
these images are from december ... and mbt3000 failed in desert test
Sir why do u think turks have better chance now as perhaps Pak has already preferred T84 OPLOT M for present?
Further Atlay is in development phase we may integrate some of it's tech on our homegrown tanks as we did in the past but due to cost factors/foreign parts odds are against Atlay.
Time is also a cost.
600+In 10 years, Only 450 al Khalid have been manufactured. We need to replace 1500 tanks in like 10 years. This is where foreign tanks comes in the picture
Sir, I do agree with some of the points, you have raised. ALTAY is essentially in a development phase, Its engine is German, we dont know how it will perform in our hot climate. The indigenous Turkish engine development is planned but how it will go ahead in future, no body knows.
Price tag around $6million v/s OPLOT $4.5 million
Currently Ukraine needs money, we may get good discounts on it. Look on bigger picture, we may get complete ToT (including engines) and IFV deal as well.
Turkey's tank is a future thing. Ukraine was the industrial hub of Soviet Union. T series plant was essentially in Ukraine. Ukraine industrial know how in tank design and engine technology is superior to Turks as of now. Lastly if you are placing your bets on ALTAY, then there is no logic of AK2 project.
India already outnumbers pakistan with regard to tanks, they have 1200 good T-90's and they have 2500 T-72's which are better than Pakistan's older chinese based tanks. Now Pakistan is getting more tanks (T-84) that do not have an advantage over the T-90's or at least a significant advantage. Pakistan needs to get some Altays, this is what will give it the edge over India's tanks.
Check out the Greek Tank trials where they compared Leo 2, Abrams, Challenger 2, and T-84 Oplot.
Brother the development phase is at an end and we'll see improvements from now on. The tank is undergoing extensive trials now with the Turkish army. As for how it will perform in hot climates, the German Leopard operating the same engine has done very well in Afghanistan's extreme heat. The indigenous phase is in full swing e.g. it's own Turkish engine. The price tag is also negligible, especially considering the massive step-up we gain in technology.
I'm not saying the OPLOT is not great, it is, but the army should go for the OPLOT to replace a large number of our obsolete tanks and go for the Altay at the higher end. Your points on technology transfer are spot on, but this wouldn't be a problem with the Turks, who are our strategic allies.
You're right about Ukraine's past, but it is the past. Currently Ukraine is suffering economically, on a war footing practically and therefore it is questionable if it could commit as of now to Pakistan's requirements.
As for their knowhow being superior to the Turks, that might have been the case in the past but Turkey has made huge leaps and bounds in this department and do remember they have the South Koreans on board as partners, who have added their expertise with the K2 Black Panther. They bring with them a technical level far greater than Ukraine's.
The AK2 project seems to be a non-starter.
If any brothers would like to see the progress of the Altay please visit this thread and see what our Turkish kin are up to.
Altay MBT Program | Page 115
It will answer many questions.
How does oplot compares with T-90 MS because afaik India signed a USD 1.6 Billion deal for around 350 T-90 MS.
Just a query without any insinuation