Syrian war criminal UN ambassador laughs when asked if his government bombed Aleppo hospitals

[Hack-Hook]

Well collateral damage is bound to happen specially if the terrorist get the idea that its good to hide between civilians.

 

[mike2000 is back]

If he steps down certainly wahhabis will genocide Shias, Alawites, Druzes and Christians.

He doesn't have lust for power what his government, Russia and Iran say is let's execute an election and let Syrian people decide. Let them choose their government let's see how much terrorists are popular in Syria. this is what the US and it's allies always have opposed. Now at least Syria has a central government but if it doesn't have situation in Syria will become worse.

If US really seek for human rights and democracy why it doesn't seek it in PGCC dictatorship sheikhi regimes, Myanmar, Nigeria, African countries and Palestine !? Is democracy only supporting terrorists in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria !?

I know you are completely an anti American person but I want to explain the main problem in the world are Americans and their terrorist allies otherwise world will progress, stupid sectarian conflicts in the world wouldn't form at all, and extremists won't grow up.

Assad doesn't have lust for power? If he stepped down then Syria would have stopped existing? Another favourite words brutal dictators use to : am the only one who was born to rule this country, it's either me or chaos.
I never knew that some make muslims people in the region actually believe this.

Anyway, keep believing in your Brutal dictators words, they will rule the countries forever.



EDIT: JUST NOTICED YOU ARE IRANIAN, SO YOUR STATEMENT IS UNDERSTANDABLE.

 

[Madali]

Your poll choices shows why terrorist lovers in the middle east don't ever call for elections. Imagine the terrorists running elections,
Choice A "Al Baghdadi because I am a good muslim and I want the best for my fellow humans and I love babies"
Choice B "Assad because I'm a baby hating rapist who loves Iran and Israel and hate all muslims and if I vote for this one I should be arrested and beheaded"

 

[mohsen]

no mercy for terrorists.

 

[denel]

Brutal dictator who will one day stand in front of God and answer for his crimes. Putin and his croonies in the same way and then Russian media goes into hyperdrive if there is ever reprisal attack with in. Putin is doing exactly the same what he did in Chechenya.

 

[Siryus]

Because rebels are so good at demonizing themselves.

 

[airmarshal]

So what about the other side that wants to take over Syria through terrorists? They are showering flower petals on common Syrians?

Take back Syria from these foreign backed terrorists whatever the cost. The cost that ultimately will pay for a foreign imposed war. Its the Syrians who are dying whether its the regime bombing to get back the area it lost to terrorists or its the terrorists targeting the regime, its Syria loss.

The FSA and other West's favorite terrorists are no less savage than ISIS. Russia is right when it says US is dealing with the devil to get its objectives in Syria.

Assad is good or bad. We are not to decide. Its Syrians to decide. If theres opposition to Assad, it does not mean foreign powers have the right to arm them and incite them to fight. Assad is a legitimate president of his country and is recognized by UN.

Listen to any of Assad's interviews. The man makes a lot of sense.

This is one of the groups backed by US and its lapdogs.

Its firing rockets toward city of Hama.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">VIDEO: Ahrar al-Sham launch Grad missile barrage against government positions in Hama military airport. <a href="https://t.co/z1Whj19eoi">pic.twitter.com/z1Whj19eoi</a></p>&mdash; Conflict News (@Conflicts) <a href="

https://twitter.com/x/status/782571346131841024

">October 2, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Assad doesn't have lust for power? If he stepped down then Syria would have stopped existing? Another favourite words brutal dictators use to : am the only one who was born to rule this country, it's either me or chaos.
I never knew that some make muslims people in the region actually believe this.

Anyway, keep believing in your Brutal dictators words, they will rule the countries forever.



EDIT: JUST NOTICED YOU ARE IRANIAN, SO YOUR STATEMENT IS UNDERSTANDABLE.

If he steps down, what is the alternative? The Wahabi terrorists funded and supported by Saudi Arabia and backed by Britain and US.

Havent we seen what bloodhounds of Britain, France and US have done to Iraq, Libya before they went for Syrian blood?

 

[Aramagedon]

Assad doesn't have lust for power? If he stepped down then Syria would have stopped existing? Another favourite words brutal dictators use to : am the only one who was born to rule this country, it's either me or chaos.
I never knew that some make muslims people in the region actually believe this.

Anyway, keep believing in your Brutal dictators words, they will rule the countries forever.



EDIT: JUST NOTICED YOU ARE IRANIAN, SO YOUR STATEMENT IS UNDERSTANDABLE.

What I say is without Syrian government wahhabi zombies (US, israel, british, saudi made) will slaughter every none Sunni in Syria and also so many of Sunnis. Mass rapings, beheading innocent people, playing with their heads ! etc... Those animals are not human and every sane person will understand those wahhabi piranhas should get killed or they slaughter innocent people due to wahhabi belefs. They should get eliminated in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan otherwise they will grow in more countries.

If Assad goes certainly situation in Syria will be much worse. Iran will help Assad as much as it is possible to wipe those piranhas off. Those satanic mujahids must get destroyed or they destroy Syria and Bath in humans blood. If west and their mujahid wahhabi brothers look for democracy let's excite an elelection tomorrow and see who will win. Anyway before that they must fully stop supporting terrorists from boarders of turkey.

You english guys usually are so dumb, you understand nothing and just laugh to death.

 

[mike2000 is back]

So what about the other side that wants to take over Syria through terrorists? They are showering flower petals on common Syrians?

Take back Syria from these foreign backed terrorists whatever the cost. The cost that ultimately will pay for a foreign imposed war. Its the Syrians who are dying whether its the regime bombing to get back the area it lost to terrorists or its the terrorists targeting the regime, its Syria loss.

The FSA and other West's favorite terrorists are no less savage than ISIS. Russia is right when it says US is dealing with the devil to get its objectives in Syria.

Assad is good or bad. We are not to decide. Its Syrians to decide. If theres opposition to Assad, it does not mean foreign powers have the right to arm them and incite them to fight. Assad is a legitimate president of his country and is recognized by UN.

Listen to any of Assad's interviews. The man makes a lot of sense.

This is one of the groups backed by US and its lapdogs.

Its firing rockets toward city of Hama.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">VIDEO: Ahrar al-Sham launch Grad missile barrage against government positions in Hama military airport. <a href="https://t.co/z1Whj19eoi">pic.twitter.com/z1Whj19eoi</a></p>&mdash; Conflict News (@Conflicts) <a href="

https://twitter.com/x/status/782571346131841024

">October 2, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>



If he steps down, what is the alternative? The Wahabi terrorists funded and supported by Saudi Arabia and backed by Britain and US.

Havent we seen what bloodhounds of Britain, France and US have done to Iraq, Libya before they went for Syrian blood?

Lol Assad could have stepped down long ago when his people rose up against him and his tyranny, just like Mubarak and Ben Ali did when faced with popular uprisings, if they had clung on to power then their countries will be in exactly the same situation as syria today. Lol
However as a power hungry dictator Assad obviously tried to cling on to power BY ALL MEANS NECESSARY,including killing his own people. It was his brutal crackdown on his own people and his order to his army to shoot to kill those who opposed him in mass protests that made the peaceful uprising turn into an armed conflict , since many of his own military men refused to shoot to kill their own brothers and. sisters thereby defecting/leaving the Army to fight their own former colleagues who were killing their own people.
Foreign powers started getting involved wayyyyyy later when the uprising had already turned into an armed conflict between both sides due to Assads Brutal crackdown. it's funny that people like you who are sympathetic to his cause ignore these facts deliberately.lol. You keep saying Assad is the "Only one who can rule Syria", "he and his familly were born to Rule Syria", "Without him here will be no Syria(as if Syria didn't exist before him.)" etc. Lol These are exactly the same things brutal dictators around the world keep saying to justify their eternal rule over their countries. LMAO. Eve Mubarak and Ben Ali once claimed the same thing. Its funny that people from the developing world like you actually believe them. . Lol
Its like saying only CHURCHILL was born to rule GREAT Britain until his death. He could have ruled for life too you know. Or general Charles De Gaulle was the only one who was born to rule a France for life and without their rule France will disappear from the surface of the earth.. @Vergennes
Nobody is born to rule a country for life, that's pure bullshit. We in the west put terms limit (no matter how popular a leader is) for a good reason you know.

The thing is, no matter how you feel about it, foreign/world powers(and even regional ones) will always get involved in an unstable country(especially one that is in civil war), it has always been the case throughout history. Whether we like it or not, that's the simple truth. So if a country doesn't wan regional powers or world powers to get involved in their business then that country's leader have to be upright enough to make sure he provides the best for his people and build a prosperous stable and SUSTAINING model were there can be peaceful transition of power without the need of bloodshed. For this to happen, that leader(of he really loves his country more than himself) ought to make sure he grants far reaching powers to his countries institutions, as far as he has build a solid foundation where the country's institutions are strong enough to challenge even the President abuse of power then that country's will thrive and survive. When the people can trust their country's institutions to make their voice heard,then you won't have situations of massive uprisings and civil wars.

In this regard, the only few leaders from the developing world I respect are people like LULA da Silva of Brazil, Nelson Mandela of south Africa, Jerry Rawlings of Ghana, etc etc. These are leaders who should serve as a model for developing countries dictators, since these leaders knew where to step down dr from power(no matter how popular they thought they were) and they did build p their country's institutions while laying up a stable foundation from where their predecessors could take power without the need for bloodshed/instability. These are exemplary leaders not the corrupt brutal dictators like Assad, KIM of N.Korea, Mugabe, etc who will cling on to power and subvert there country's institutions just so they can rule until death no matter the consequences this have for their countries. Lol
So go figure out. Only Assad himself is to blame for the current situation he has plunged his country into. Foreign powrers only get involve as always to secure their interests.