What's new

Syrian air defenses repel Israeli aggression, intercept several hostile missiles over Damascus

Psychologically speaking they don't seem sad, afraid, or anything.

Yes, they don't seem "sad", once again, if you actually listened to what the soldiers themselves are saying, instead of creating your own "facts", then you'd see the true picture:

Lets start with this:

Now that the Danish soldiers have been a few days away from the experience, the mood has changed. It is still crowded, but the soldiers are also relieved and they enjoy themselves in Kuwait, playing cards and talking to the family at home. Psychologists are now on their way to Kuwait to help the Danish soldiers recover from the experience.



And for another American soldier:

"it's very hard to describe it, I will tell, it was extremely scary. Some of my team and I were hunkered down in one of those bunkers and when the first wave started hitting you could feel the shockwave and even inside the bunker the pressure was so strong that we watched our bunker door sink inside the bunker"

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/01/11/middleeast/iran-strike-al-asad-air-base-exclusive-intl/index.html



No American was killed, Iran lied, end of story.


Your logic: I can see US soldiers alive in a video, that means no Americans were killed.
 
Last edited:
Not only that, but the F-35 hit with the bird was hit 2 weeks before Syria's claim, but was reported at the same day.

Yes, they don't seem "sad", once again, if you actually listened to what the soldiers themselves are saying, instead of creating your own "facts", then you'd see the true picture:

Lets start with this:








https://edition.cnn.com/2020/01/11/middleeast/iran-strike-al-asad-air-base-exclusive-intl/index.html






Your logic: I can see US soldiers alive in a video, that means no Americans were killed.
Alright mate nothing you say makes sense and I start to believe you're genuinely on the spectrum.
Show me proof of a single American killed and I'll believe you.
 
A conspiracy theory versus a common scenario. I'll choose a common scenario.
Apparently an F-35 can survive a huge 200kg warhead of the S-200, fly back to base, and our mechanics are so good that they got it flying in less than a week.

This is called mental gymnastics. You're trying find all the excuses you can find. The S-200 can utilise proximity fuse, it may have exploded in a distance not close enough to cause completely destruction. SAM's are not always fully effective. It happens.

The Syrians weren't trying to hit it because
1. The F-35 wasn't even operational yet
2. The F-35 wasn't flying over Syria
3. Even if it was, the Syrians cannot detect it.

Right, it was not operation and flying over Syria and yet, apparently it was there to be hit by a "bird". And sorry, but the fact the Syrian so quickly came out with their story and you had to invent your bird story hints to what actually happened.
 
Because common sense would tell you, that the fact they gave pre-warning hours before the attack, meant the barracks would be emptied.
Which absolutely debunks the claim of American casualties due to the destruction of the barracks.
 
Alright mate nothing you say makes sense and I start to believe you're genuinely on the spectrum.
Show me proof of a single American killed and I'll believe you.


I'll show you the Americans when you show me the Iranians "killed" by Israel according to your intelligence sources.
 
This is called mental gymnastics. You're trying find all the excuses you can find. The S-200 can utilise proximity fuse, it may have exploded in a distance not close enough to cause completely destruction. SAM's are not always fully effective. It happens.
If that's the case then the F-35 wasn't even shot down, which means you're a liar again.
Except the F-35 was hit by an actual bird and not a missile, 2 weeks before it was reported, and before Syria claimed it shot it down.
 
Which absolutely debunks the claim of American casualties due to the destruction of the barracks.

Yes, because only barracks were targeted, it's not like soldiers were still in that case, and Iran targeted more than just barracks, right?

If that's the case then the F-35 wasn't even shot down, which means you're a liar again.

I am going by your claims that "it went back to Israel". You need to pay close attention.

Except the F-35 was hit by an actual bird and not a missile, 2 weeks before it was reported, and before Syria claimed it shot it down.

"2 weeks before" you mean Israeli fake version of the story?
 
I'll show you the Americans when you show me the Iranians "killed" by Israel according to your intelligence sources.
You just have to show me anyone killed in that base.
The difference between you and me is that you want me to prove specifically Iranians were killed, we both agree some people died. And I cannot do that as it is a claim by the Israeli intelligence, I cannot send you the bodies because
1. They're burnt up
2. They're in Syria

While all you need to do is to show me someone died, in general.
I don't need him to be an American, he can be Irish for all I care. You can do that if it actually happened. Except it didn't.
 
You just have to show me anyone killed in that base.

I told you, I'll do that when you show me those Iranians you claimed Israel killed.



The difference between you and me is that you want me to prove specifically Iranians were killed, we both agree some people died.

Where are those "some" that have died?

And I cannot do that as it is a claim by the Israeli intelligence, I cannot send you the bodies because
1. They're burnt up
2. They're in Syria

I can't send you bodies either because:

1- They're burnt up
2- They're in Iraq

While all you need to do is to show me someone died, in general.

Same to you.

I don't need him to be an American, he can be Irish for all I care. You can do that if it actually happened. Except it didn't.

And where is you proof, again? I am still waiting for it.
 
Right, it was not operation and flying over Syria and yet, apparently it was there to be hit by a "bird". And sorry, but the fact the Syrian so quickly came out with their story and you had to invent your bird story hints to what actually happened.
It wasn't flying over Syria.
And Syria claimed it shot down numerous F-15s, F-16s, and it even claimed it shot down an F-16 along with the F-35. Yet it never showed proof. The single time an Israeli F-16 was shot down, Israel immediately responded with overwhelming bombardments, of Iranian troops, UAV command centers, Syrian air defenses, etc.
Israel cannot hide the death of pilots, or any death in general, our press is free.
Iran on the other hand, being the dictatorship it is, can hide deaths.
 
It wasn't flying over Syria.

It was.

And Syria claimed it shot down numerous F-15s, F-16s, and it even claimed it shot down an F-16 along with the F-35. Yet it never showed proof. The single time an Israeli F-16 was shot down, Israel immediately responded with overwhelming bombardments, of Iranian troops, UAV command centers, Syrian air defenses, etc.
Israel cannot hide the death of pilots, or any death in general, our press is free.

You had to hide it because it was so embarrassing.
Iran on the other hand, being the dictatorship it is, can hide deaths.

Oh please, the exact opposite is true. When an Iranian dies in places like Syria and Iraq, they're are brought back to Iran and there are massive funerals. You certainly do love to invent your own "facts", don't you?
 
Where are those "some" that have died?
https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news...argets-over-damascus-state-news-agency-626035
I can't send you bodies either because:

1- They're burnt up
2- They're in Iraq
You know what's the difference between the Israeli strike on Iranians in Syria, and the Iranian strike on the US military base in Iraq?
Israel never took responsibility, thus will never release the footage.And actually, my bad. The claims that 7 people were killed, and that 4 of them were Iranian, were not Israeli intelligence but local Syrian claims. So if you want proof, don't ask me or Israel, ask the Syrians.

Iran not only did take responsibility, but it also announced it was going to strike.
To even claim they took a single life they need surveillance on the airbase. Did they have any footage of the strike? Any proof someone was killed? I highly doubt it.

Same to you.
You're denying people were killed in the attack?
Or denying Iranians were killed? I can't prove you their identity, we would have to believe the Syrians.

You had to hide it because it was so embarrassing.
You have absolutely nothing to back that claim mate

Oh please, the exact opposite is true. When an Iranian dies in places like Syria and Iraq, they're are brought back to Iran and there are massive funerals. You certainly do love to invent your own "facts", don't you?
Unless they were killed by Israelis, then nothing is reported to the media.
 

Israeli source? That's as much as a proof as claims by your intelligent agency.



You know what's the difference between the Israeli strike on Iranians in Syria, and the Iranian strike on the US military base in Iraq?
Israel never took responsibility, thus will never release the footage.And actually, my bad. The claims that 7 people were killed, and that 4 of them were Iranian, were not Israeli intelligence but local Syrian claims. So if you want proof, don't ask me or Israel, ask the Syrians.

Then those claims are baseless and you need to stop repeating them. I have see many such claims of "Iranians" being killed and they ended up being some Hezbollah or Iraqis.



To even claim they took a single life they need surveillance on the airbase. Did they have any footage of the strike? Any proof someone was killed? I highly doubt it.

If you are truly waiting for proof before making up your mind, then wait to see if such a thing is released. However, then do not claim no one was killed because you cannot provide any proof for that claim.

You're denying people were killed in the attack?
Or denying Iranians were killed? I can't prove you their identity, we would have to believe the Syrians.

Read my statement above regarding this.



You have absolutely nothing to back that claim mate

No backing from you either. Israeli claims are not enough.

Unless they were killed by Israelis, then nothing is reported to the media.

More disinformation. Are you hoping these lies will not be debunked? Almost every Iranian that died in Syria fighting ISIS had a massive funeral. Here is one example for a soldier called Hojaji:

2589286.jpg


mourners-attend-the-funeral-procession-of-mohsen-hojaji-a-25yearold-picture-id854650812
 
Israeli source? That's as much as a proof as claims by your intelligent agency.
The source is Syrian. The reporters are Israeli. As I said I was wrong, our intelligence agency never provided any claim because Israel has never took responsibility for the air strike. It was probably the Finnish Air Force I guess.

Then those claims are baseless and you need to stop repeating them. I have see many such claims of "Iranians" being killed and they ended up being some Hezbollah or Iraqis.
Show me a case where Iranians were claimed to be killed, and it was proven those weren't Iranians that were killed.

If you are truly waiting for proof before making up your mind, then wait to see if such a thing is released. However, then do not claim no one was killed because you cannot provide any proof for that claim.
I'll wait, I guess forever because it never happened.
 
The source is Syrian. The reporters are Israeli. As I said I was wrong, our intelligence agency never provided any claim because Israel has never took responsibility for the air strike. It was probably the Finnish Air Force I guess.

Okay, we'll that's not very credible then.

Show me a case where Iranians were claimed to be killed, and it was proven those weren't Iranians that were killed.

Simple. Go to the Syrian thread if you have time and see the many examples. I don't have time to start going through the threads.
 
Back
Top Bottom