What's new

Syria war widens rift between Shia clergy in Iraq, Iran

Pak-Americanos

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Mar 2, 2013
Messages
569
Reaction score
0
2013-635099275337871955-787.jpg


The civil war in Syria is widening a rift between top Shia Muslim clergy in Iraq and Iran who have taken opposing stands on whether or not to send followers into combat on President Bashar Al-Assad's side.

Competition for leadership of the Shia community has intensified since the US-led invasion of 2003 toppled Saddam Hussein, empowering majority Shias through the ballot box and restoring the Iraqi holy city of Najaf to prominence.

In Iran's holy city of Qom, senior Shia clerics, or Marjiiya, have issued fatwas (edicts) enjoining their followers to fight in Syria, where mainly Sunni rebels are fighting to overthrow Assad, whose Alawite sect derives from Shia Islam.

Shia militant leaders fighting in Syria and those in charge of recruitment in Iraq say the number of volunteers has increased significantly since the fatwas were pronounced.


Tehran, Assad's staunchest defender in the region, has drawn on other Shia allies, including Lebanese militia Hezbollah.

Hezbollah's open intervention earlier this year hardened the sectarian tone of a conflict that grew out of a peaceful street uprising against four decades of Assad family rule, and shifted the battlefield tide in the Syrian government's favour.

The Syrian war has polarised Sunnis and Shias across the Middle East – but has also spotlighted divisions within each of Islam's two main denominations, putting Qom and Najaf at odds and complicating intra-Shia relations in Iraq.

In Najaf, Grand Ayatollah Ali Al-Sistani, who commands unswerving loyalty from most Iraqi Shias and many more worldwide, has refused to sanction fighting in a war he views as political rather than religious.

Despite Sistani's stance, some of Iraq's most influential Shia political parties and militia, who swear allegiance to Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, have answered his call to arms and sent their disciples into battle in Syria.

"Those who went to fight in Syria are disobedient," said a senior Shia cleric who runs the office of one of the top four Marjiya in Najaf.

"Shia crescent"

The split is rooted in a fundamental difference of opinion over the nature and scope of clerical authority.

Najaf Marjiiya see the role of the cleric in public affairs as limited, whereas in Iran, the cleric is the Supreme Leader and holds ultimate spiritual and political authority in the "Velayet e-Faqih" system ("guardianship of the jurist").

"The tension between the two Marjiiya already existed a long time ago, but now it has an impact on the Iraqi position towards the Syria crisis," a senior Shia cleric with links to Marjiiya in Najaf said on condition of anonymity.

"If both Marjiiya had a unified position (toward Syria), we would witness a position of (Iraqi) government support for the Syrian regime".

The Shia-led government in Baghdad says it takes no sides in the civil war, but the flow of Iraqi militiamen across the border into Syria has compromised that official position.

Khamenei and his faithful in Iraq and Iran regard Syria as an important link in a "Shia Crescent" stretching from Tehran to Beirut through Baghdad and Damascus, according to senior clerics and politicians.

Answering a question posted on his website by one of his followers regarding the legitimacy of fighting in Syria, senior Iraq Shia cleric Kadhim Al-Haeari, who is based in Iran, described fighting in Syria as a "duty" to defend Islam.

Militants say that around 50 Iraqi Shias fly to Damascus every week to fight, often alongside Assad's troops, or to protect the Sayyida Zeinab shrine on the outskirts of the capital, an especially sacred place for Shias.

"I am following my Marjiiya. My spiritual leader has said fighting in Syria is a legitimate duty. I do not pay attention to what others say," said Ali, a former Mehdi army militant who was packing his bag to travel from Iraq to Syria.

"No one has the right to stop me. I am defending my religion, my Imam's daughter Sayyida Zeinab's shrine."

A high-ranking Shia cleric who runs the office of one of the four top Marjiiya in Najaf said the protection of Shia shrines in Syria was used as a pretext by Iran to galvanise Shias into action.



"Shia project"


In the 10 years since Saddam's fall, Iran's influence in Iraq has grown and it has sought to gain a foothold in Najaf in particular.

Senior Iranian clerics have opened offices in Najaf, as well as non-governmental organizations, charities and cultural institutions, most of which are funded directly by Marjiiya in Iran, or the Iranian Embassy in Baghdad, local officials said.

The Iranian flag flies over a two-storey building in an upscale neighbourhood of Najaf, which houses the "Imam Khomeini Institution," named after the Islamic Republic's founder, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.

The Imam Khomeini Institution is one of many Iranian entities that have engaged in social activities in Iraq, focusing on young men, helping them get married, and paying regular stipends to widows, orphans and students of religion.

Some institutions also support young clerics and fund free trips for university students to visit Shia shrines in Iran, including a formal visit to Khamenei's office in Tehran, Shia politicians with knowledge of the activities say.

"We have a big project in Iraq aimed at spreading the principles of Velayet e-Faqih and the young are our target," a high-ranking Shia leader who works under Khamenei's auspices said on condition of anonymity.

"We are not looking to establish an Islamic State in Iraq, but at least we want to create revolutionary entities that would be ready to fight to save the Shia project".

Syria war widens rift between Shia clergy in Iraq, Iran - Region - World - Ahram Online
 
. . .
Iran has new president.... but nothing has changed!

'Shia project' is to clear the way from Isfahan to Israel.
Syria is the last country they need to take over before arrival of Dajjal (anti-christ).
 
.
The young are not as religious as the eldery, same we can see in Iran, the young dislike the regime and its ideology, as Iraqs new generation grows up chance is bigger they head towards secularism.
 
.
The young are not as religious as the eldery, same we can see in Iran, the young dislike the regime and its ideology, as Iraqs new generation grows up chance is bigger they head towards secularism.

That is good news I guess, but when will the new generation take over from the older generation and put a stop to the sectarian killings.
 
.
That is good news I guess, but when will the new generation take over from the older generation and put a stop to the sectarian killings.

I dont know about that, Iraq has a different system then Iran making it easier for a switch of parties with different ideology, the young population outnumbers the elder by large. They will be growing up open to the outside world which will give them different views. My point with that was that little of the young generation is waiting for that system Iran wants to spread according to the article.
 
.
Why don't you show us one of those Fatwas issued by clergy in Iran regarding fighting in Syria? Where is it?An invisible fatwa?
Weren't Saudi Clerics among the first ones who issued fatwa for people to go to Syria and fight the 'holy Jihad' against Assad?
 
.
First, it shows that Iraq is not a puppet of Iran, as some claim.

But the real question is: Why do Iraqi Shias want work with Iran?! Did Iran force them to do it? No, not at all.
So why do they prefer Iran over the US? Be sure, it has absolutely nothing to do with Shia solidarity, this is just for public consumption. We are talking about nation state actors, and nation states only act out of national interests.

So don't always stick to the question, why Iran works with Iraq. The far more important question is: Why does Iraq work with Iran??!
 
.
Why don't you show us one of those Fatwas issued by clergy in Iran regarding fighting in Syria? Where is it?An invisible fatwa?
Weren't Saudi Clerics among the first ones who issued fatwa for people to go to Syria and fight the 'holy Jihad' against Assad?

:no: No Saudi cleric issued a damn thing about going there and doing this and that.
 
.
First, it shows that Iraq is not a puppet of Iran, as some claim.

But the real question is: Why do Iraqi Shias want work with Iran?! Did Iran force them to do it? No, not at all.
So why do they prefer Iran over the US? Be sure, it has absolutely nothing to do with Shia solidarity, this is just for public consumption. We are talking about nation state actors, and nation states only act out of national interests.

So don't always stick to the question, why Iran works with Iraq. The far more important question is: Why does Iraq work with Iran??!

Not Iran over the US, they prefer Iran over GCC, as Nouri al maliki rejected an invitation to join GCC last year.
 
.
Iran has new president.... but nothing has changed!

'Shia project' is to clear the way from Isfahan to Israel.
Syria is the last country they need to take over before arrival of Dajjal (anti-christ).

before saying stupid things, educate yourself

president of Iran will be next month. still Ahmadinejad is president right now. thx.

:no: No Saudi cleric issued a damn thing about going there and doing this and that.
yeah sure KSA is paradise
thank you
 
.
Not Iran over the US

Oh yes, Iran over US, otherwise Iraq would have established permanent US military bases on Iraqi soil.
Iraqs military is not strong to ensure its sovereignty against Irans, but still Iraqis wanted the US military out of their country, this shows that Iraq preferred Iran over the US.
 
.
Oh yes, Iran over US, otherwise Iraq would have established permanent US military bases on Iraqi soil.
Iraqs military is not strong to ensure its sovereignty against Irans, but still Iraqis wanted the US military out of their country, this shows that Iraq preferred Iran over the US.

US permanent bases would bring more trouble then good, they would interfere in everything, they would not help protecting the sovereignty, only their presence would have some strength as a warning to other countries.

Kicking the US out does not mean they want Iranian bases, its for sure prefering Iran over GCC.

The US is still the largest military equipment supplier to Iraq, if Iraq was really anti NATO/USA they would completely turn to the eastern blocks which is not the case.

If you remember the 2009 fakkah oil well incident it proves your statement wrong about Iraq preferring Iran over the US in terms of sovereignty of whatsoever.
 
.
Dear Dr. Hussien,

There has been no official Fatwa by the Saudi Council of Ulama regarding Jehad in Syria, if there was any, trust me Assad would have kicked the bucket ages ago.

yeah sure KSA is paradise
thank you
 
.
Back
Top Bottom