What's new

Syria says it has weapons of mass destruction in case of foreign attack

Evil Flare

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 3, 2008
Messages
3,508
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
(CNN) -- The Syrian Foreign Ministry said Monday that the country has chemical or biological weapons, but would never use them against its citizens -- only against foreign attackers.
"Any stocks of (weapons of mass destruction) or any unconventional weapon that the Syrian Arab Republic possesses would never be used against civilians or against the Syrian people during this crisis at any circumstance, no matter how the crisis would evolve," ministry spokesman Jihad Makdissi told reporters.
"All the stocks of these weapons that the Syrian Arab Republic possesses are monitored and guarded by the Syrian army. These weapons are meant to be used only and strictly in the event of external aggression against the Syrian Arab Republic," he said Monday.
The remarks come after months of international chatter about whether foreign countries should intervene militarily to try to end more than a year of bloodshed in Syria.


Meanwhile, the Arab League will offer Syrian President Bashar al-Assad "a safe exit" if he resigns quickly and leaves the country, a senior Arab League official said, marking the latest attempt to get Syria's longtime ruler to step down.
The official provided no further details because the source is not authorized to speak to the media.
Qatari Foreign Minister Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al-Thani did not discuss an exit plan when speaking with reporters after the Sunday meeting, but confirmed "there is an agreement on the need for the swift resignation" of al-Assad.
"We call on the opposition and the Free Syrian Army to form a government of national unity," Sheikh Hamad said.
Despite the Arab League's proposal, the brutal violence has not let up. At least 30 people were killed Monday, the opposition Local Coordination Committees of Syria said.
See images of the showdown in Syria
The Arab League would not be the first to offer an outlet for al-Assad.
Tunisia -- the cradle of the Arab Spring uprisings and the first country last year to oust its longtime ruler -- offered asylum to the Syrian president in February in an attempt to spare further bloodshed.
And the daughter of Qatar's emir has suggested exile in Doha, according to a cache of e-mails leaked to CNN earlier this year.
If al-Assad were to leave, he would follow a series of longtime rulers in the region who have succumbed to popular revolts since last year, including former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, deposed Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi and former Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh, who stepped down in a transfer-of-power deal.
Rime Allaf, an associate fellow at the Chatham House in London, said she thinks Syrians opposed to al-Assad are split on the notion of a "safe exit" for the president.
"Some may want a way to save as many lives as possible, so if he leaves without prosecution, then so be it, as they think the matter of most urgency now is saving the Syrian people," said Allaf, a Syrian national.
"Others say it is impossible to let him leave. Not only would it let him get away with thousands of murders and the destruction of the country, but it also would give him a green light to keep on doing what's he's doing, knowing that when he decides to leave, he can leave."


But Allaf said she thinks there is "absolutely zero" chance that the president will take up the Arab League's offer.
"I think Assad does not plan on ever accepting any possible plans for escaping or leaving," she said. "I think he will keep on fighting, hoping the revolution will stop."
The Syrian government has long maintained that "armed terrorist groups" are fueling violence in the country.
Responding to a question about clashes in Damascus, "we are in a state of self-defense," Makdissi said.
But he later added, "this is an exceptional matter. It will last a couple of days, and matters will return to normal."
On Monday, chaos ensued in cities across the country, opposition activists said.
In Homs, two people were killed "due to intense shelling by helicopters and rocket launchers, accompanied by intense clashes between the (rebel) Free Syrian Army and the regime army," the LCC said.
The LCC reported fierce clashes for a second day in Aleppo, a critical city in the Syrian crisis. Aleppo, the largest city and commercial hub of Syria, is akin to New York in the United States.
Both Aleppo and the capital city of Damascus -- longtime al-Assad strongholds -- came under heavy fighting Sunday, opposition activists said.
By the end of the day, 111 people had died across Syria, including 56 people in and around Damascus and three in Aleppo, the LCC said.
CNN cannot independently confirm reports of violence because the government restricts access by foreign journalists.
In a video posted online Sunday, the head of the rebel Free Syrian Army in Aleppo announced an operation "to liberate the city of Aleppo from the rule of the Assad thugs, whose hands were blood-stained by heinous crimes against our people."
Brig. Gen. Abdel Jabbar Al-Obeidi also vowed to secure Aleppo and protect all minorities and sects, including the members of Alawite sect that the president belongs to.
If rebels eventually gain control of Aleppo, it would mark a pivotal point in the Syrian crisis and deal a heavy blow to al-Assad's financial ties.
The Syrian crisis started in March 2011, when a fierce government crackdown against protesters morphed into a nationwide uprising against the regime.
Video: How does Assad survive in Syria?
The United Nations estimates more than 10,000 people have been killed since the crisis began more than 16 months ago. But Rupert Colville, a spokesman for the office of the U.N. high commissioner for human rights, said the United Nations has not been giving out overall death toll numbers since December "because it became impossible to verify the numbers in any meaningful way."
Opposition groups tracking deaths have issued higher tolls. The LCC, for example, estimates more than 16,000 people -- mostly civilians -- have died.
In addition to the deaths, thousands of refugees have fled Syria into neighboring countries to escape the turmoil.
The United States will give Jordan $100 million in special economic aid to help ease the burden of hosting Syrian refugees, the U.S. Embassy in Jordan said Monday.
Read more: Why Syria could get even uglier
 
I am not too surprised to hear that a sovereign country would use all the weapons they could muster to fight an invader! Do any of you think the usa would not nuke if a powerful force attacked intending to invade our counrty?
 
not a big deal,even iraq was having biological weapons, but what happened to them ,we all know......
 
not a big deal,even iraq was having biological weapons, but what happened to them ,we all know......
there is no evidance for that claim that Iraq had WMD, any way USA bought that bargain and destroyed the IRAQi civilization.
besides Sirya seem to invite the US with the same foolishness Sadam did.
 
Syria along with 6 other nations including Israel are non-signatories to the Chemical Weapons Convention of 1993, which is basically a treaty/guideline on chemical weapons usage. Everyone knows Syria has chemical weapons, and Syria recently admitted to it also, and i dont see where is the problem with it.

Whether you like it or not, all countries capable of producing these type of weapons, call them WMD's if you like, will make and use them in a situation where their country is at stake, regardless of what treaty they signed earlier. So if you have countries with stockpiles of nuclear weapons, what is the problem with chemical weapons? Also, with USA crying foul-play with this chemical weapon thing is funny, because they used the Agent Orange in Vietnam, and only God knows what they will use if some country attacks them in their homeland, so why this cry of outrage? It seems to me this is only being done to scare people regarding Syria who dont have much idea about these things.
 
I am not too surprised to hear that a sovereign country would use all the weapons they could muster to fight an invader! Do any of you think the usa would not nuke if a powerful force attacked intending to invade our counrty?


As long as the enemy doesn't use WMDs, we can handle any conventional invasion.
 
Giving the ammunition they need to intervene, stupid, stupid, stupid.
Just resign Assad and give the country back to the Syrians
 
They are already facing massive Mexican invasion.

I heard many retreated because of the U.S. economy lol.:meeting: What a way to turn back the invasion. Got a couple of friends leaving because of no jobs to send some money back to their families. No point in staying.
 

Back
Top Bottom