Supreme Court Rejects Applications Regarding Prime Minister’s Disqualification!

[Norwegian]

ISLAMABAD – Supreme Court of Pakistan reject all four plea against regarding Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s disqualification, PakistanTribe reported.

Seven judge larger bench of the supreme court, headed by Chief Justice Nasirul Mulk hear four different pleas, filed by Pakistan Tehrrek -e- Insaf (PTI) leader Ishaq Khan Khakwani, PML-Q chief Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain, Insaaf Lawyers wing’s Gohar Nawaz Sindhu and Muhammad Azhar Siddiqui.

Earlier, The petitioners claimed that the premier had first asked army chief General Raheel Sharif to act as a ‘mediator’ between the government and protesting parties PTI and PAT and to serve as a ‘guarantor’ to any agreement with the parties.

They alleged that the premier had later lied in front of parliament and denied making any such request to the army chief and should therefore be disqualified in view of Article 63 of the constitution. Irfan Qadir advocate is representing the PTI as well as PML-Q leaders in this case.

The larger bench will also adjudicate the questions raised by a three-judge bench headed by Justice Jawwad S Khawaja in its four-page written order, while hearing senior vice president of the Insaf Lawyers wing’s Gohar Nawaz Sindhu’s appeal against the Lahore High Court’s September 2, 2014, order to reject the writ petition.

The top court office has already issued notices to PTI Vice President Hamid Khan, PPP’s Senator Raza Rabbani and senior counsel Khawaja Haris to assist the court as amicus curiae (friends of the court) in this matter.

The bench had formulated a number of questions for consideration, with an emphasis to lay down a law suggesting what should be the minimum threshold for attracting Articles 62(1 f) and 63(1 g) of the Constitution, requiring a conviction by a court against a member of parliament.
Supreme Court Rejects Applications Regarding Prime Miniter’s Disqualification | Pakistan Tribe

So once again: RO IMRAN RO!

@SBD-3 @cb4 @AsianUnion @Aether @xyxmt @Proudpakistaniguy @WishLivePak @Waffen SS @FaujHistorian @Fracker @Ranches @ghoul @Jf Thunder @GreenFalcon @genmirajborgza786 @orangzaib @Pakistani Exile @KURUMAYA @Irfan Baloch @ali_raza @Syed.Ali.Haider @dexter @Patriots @muslim_pakistani @W.11 @Meengla @zaid butt @ajpirzada @Shoaib Rathore @OrionHunter @CHARGER @Major Sam @yesboss @TheFlyingPretzel @TheNoob @Bratva @ghazaliy2k @Viny @StormShadow @suresh1773 @SOHEIL @venu309 @danish_vij @Force-India @faisal6309 @SpArK @S.U.R.B. @vsdave2302 @jarves @WAJsal @pursuit of happiness @Winchester @janon @pak-marine @AgNoStiC MuSliM @420canada @sathya @HughSlaman @slapshot @raza_888 @Donatello

 

[osama zafar]

We need a revolution accept it or not it will happen with or without you.

 

[WAJsal]

wow ,WTH looks biased to me.

 

[Norwegian]

wow ,WTH looks biased to me.

Its Pakistani courts. What did you expect? That's why we need Tehreek Insaf to fix Pakistani justice system that is run by crooks!

 

[WAJsal]

Its Pakistani courts. What did you expect? That's why we need Tehreek Insaf to fix Pakistani justice system that is run by crooks!

this is as biased as it get,PM lied in front of the whole country and supreme court does nothing WOW

 

[Norwegian]

this is as biased as it get,PM lied in front of the whole country and supreme court does nothing WOW

PM said on floor of the House that COAS asked to act as a facilitator between PAT / PTI. Then ISPR contradicted this claim of PM by tweeting that it wasn't COAS but PM himself who asked COAS to facilitate in the first place! A ten year old can understand this but these 60+ year old Supreme Judges? Hell NO! They even said this case is politically motivated. Isn't SC politically motivated by not reaching to correct judgment that PM indeed lied?

 

[WAJsal]

PM said on floor of the House that COAS asked to act as a facilitator between PAT / PTI. Then ISPR contradicted this claim of PM by tweeting that it wasn't COAS but PM himself who asked COAS to facilitate in the first place! A ten year old can understand this but these 60+ year old Supreme Judges? Hell NO! They even said this case is politically motivated. Isn't SC politically motivated by not reaching to correct judgment that PM indeed lied?

OMG no comments,explains our situation i guess

 

[Jzaib]

can we sell Supreme court on OXL they only give justice to sharif family

 

[expert]

How much?

 

[PurpleButcher]

Hence Proved, The theorem of injustice of Pakistan

can we sell Supreme court on OXL they only give justice to sharif family

baich day

 

[SBD-3]

Chalo sahabash apni party policy par ajao sab....Galian!

 

[vsdave2302]

ISLAMABAD – Supreme Court of Pakistan reject all four plea against regarding Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s disqualification, PakistanTribe reported.

Seven judge larger bench of the supreme court, headed by Chief Justice Nasirul Mulk hear four different pleas, filed by Pakistan Tehrrek -e- Insaf (PTI) leader Ishaq Khan Khakwani, PML-Q chief Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain, Insaaf Lawyers wing’s Gohar Nawaz Sindhu and Muhammad Azhar Siddiqui.

Earlier, The petitioners claimed that the premier had first asked army chief General Raheel Sharif to act as a ‘mediator’ between the government and protesting parties PTI and PAT and to serve as a ‘guarantor’ to any agreement with the parties.

They alleged that the premier had later lied in front of parliament and denied making any such request to the army chief and should therefore be disqualified in view of Article 63 of the constitution. Irfan Qadir advocate is representing the PTI as well as PML-Q leaders in this case.

The larger bench will also adjudicate the questions raised by a three-judge bench headed by Justice Jawwad S Khawaja in its four-page written order, while hearing senior vice president of the Insaf Lawyers wing’s Gohar Nawaz Sindhu’s appeal against the Lahore High Court’s September 2, 2014, order to reject the writ petition.

The top court office has already issued notices to PTI Vice President Hamid Khan, PPP’s Senator Raza Rabbani and senior counsel Khawaja Haris to assist the court as amicus curiae (friends of the court) in this matter.

The bench had formulated a number of questions for consideration, with an emphasis to lay down a law suggesting what should be the minimum threshold for attracting Articles 62(1 f) and 63(1 g) of the Constitution, requiring a conviction by a court against a member of parliament.
Supreme Court Rejects Applications Regarding Prime Miniter’s Disqualification | Pakistan Tribe

So once again: RO IMRAN RO!

@SBD-3 @cb4 @AsianUnion @Aether @xyxmt @Proudpakistaniguy @WishLivePak @Waffen SS @FaujHistorian @Fracker @Ranches @ghoul @Jf Thunder @GreenFalcon @genmirajborgza786 @orangzaib @Pakistani Exile @KURUMAYA @Irfan Baloch @ali_raza @Syed.Ali.Haider @dexter @Patriots @muslim_pakistani @W.11 @Meengla @zaid butt @ajpirzada @Shoaib Rathore @OrionHunter @CHARGER @Major Sam @yesboss @TheFlyingPretzel @TheNoob @Bratva @ghazaliy2k @Viny @StormShadow @suresh1773 @SOHEIL @venu309 @danish_vij @Force-India @faisal6309 @SpArK @S.U.R.B. @vsdave2302 @jarves @WAJsal @pursuit of happiness @Winchester @janon @pak-marine @AgNoStiC MuSliM @420canada @sathya @HughSlaman @slapshot @raza_888 @Donatello

Very good Judgement and befitting reply to this moron IK.

 

[Norwegian]

Very good Judgement and befitting reply to this moron IK.

LOLZ. Indian?

 

[Proudpakistaniguy]

Supreme court biki bi tu kitne main lol

Roo idiot Khan Roo..

As i said imran will only accept those courts or chief justices who will give decision according to his wishes otherwise he will issue his own fatwa

 

[Dubious]

Hence Proved, The theorem of injustice of Pakistan


baich day

I read that as Biaachh

Supreme court biki bi tu kitne main lol

Roo idiot Khan Roo..

As i said imran will only accept those courts or chief justices who will give decision according to his wishes otherwise he will issue his own fatwa

1 Mercedes wali gari ho....
Wonder how many judges will get Mercedes after this