Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"No offense but many civilian also died in NATO and US bombing runs. I never saw you saying that it was a sad incident."
Nobody has accused the U.S. or ISAF of ever intentionally targeting civilians. No offense, but I'd suggest your own armed forces have experienced the same. Civilians dying needlessly is always a tragedy. So's war and, as such, often unavoidable.
OTOH, last year over 2400 afghan civilians died because of this war. UNAMA has identified over 1600 of them at the hand of the taliban while all of ISAF (to include America) was less than 596. Nearly 3:1 ratio. Worse, HRW has documented the deliberate attack on civilians by the taliban while also documenting the use of civilians by the taliban as human shields.
There's frankly no comparison. Today was just another example of what the afghans know all too well.
Thanks.
Had the U.S. actually hit a major city with a Daisy Cutter the devastation and loss of life would have been in the tens of thousands and we would have heard about it every day in the media for years. Why do you make such a patently false assertion?US also targeted major cities of Afghanistan through Tomo Hawk and Desi Cutter during their invasion of Afghanistan
.
The bottom line is that they are not targeting civilians.
The bottom line is that shopping centres are packed with innocent shopers and they are civilians, another bottom line is that school children are also highly innocent and civilian and they delibrately targeted them 2 years ago and killed them in dozens, the third bottom line is that they masacared thousands of shias in north before 9/11, the fourth bottom line is that they masacared thousands in Parwan, Kapisa, the fifth bottom line is that they masacared men, women, children in central parts of the country, the other bottom line is that they compleltely destroyed people's houses and cut down all of their fruitful trees and livelihoods, there are many many many bottom lines about your beloved killer taliban. you are such a hypocrate man, you dont want your house to burn but cheer when the taliban burn our house.
Afghan mujahdeen wanted to liberate their home from US occupation and all muslims except northern alliance are supporting their cause .If this is hypocracy , i love it
Had the U.S. actually hit a major city with a Daisy Cutter the devastation and loss of life would have been in the tens of thousands and we would have heard about it every day in the media for years. Why do you make such a patently false assertion?
Around 50 Tomahawk cruise missiles were also used. The strikes initially focused on the area in and around the cities of Kabul, Jalalabad, and Kandahar.
Northern Alliance forces, possibly with the approval of nearby U.S Special Forces, packed captured Taliban fighters into trucks with no ventilation for transport to the Afghan prisons and executed many on the spot. Nearly 2000 captured Taliban died, either by suffocation or execution. This was only a precursor of one of the war�s bloodiest battles.
Yes we all remember it, and there were many pakistani fighters as well among those prisoners. But here is a difference, they killed the taliban fighters and the taliban killed women, kids, men in their homes and on the street, hope you see the difference. by the way, i dont care about NA , or Taliban, they are all the same. but presently it is the taliban busy killing people.
100-200 civilians were reported killed when 25 bombs struck a village at the foot of the Tora Bora and White Mountains region. The Pentagon initially denied the reports and maintains a policy of not counting civilian deaths
everybody is killing the afghans, including the coalition forces, it is us who are paying the price for this proxy war which has got nothing to do with us. you should also know that there is every parallel to the situation of afghanistn and pakistan. what do you make up of those civilian casualties in pakistan in the hands of pakistani army?
Brother , in the end Afghan nation has to resolve their internal differences and think about their future , We will continue to help Afghan Rafugees and ready to provide help but real problem is occupation which is biggest curse , why US is not giving any time frame for exit ? this is point of real concern , it means they have long term plan to stay in Afghanistan.
Nations have to sacrifice for their sovernity and independence.Read history of independence of Pakistan.Still we are facing lot of challenges , India had never accepted our independence and trying to weaken our national unity by supporting BLA and TTP.
Brother , in the end Afghan nation has to resolve their internal differences and think about their future , We will continue to help Afghan Rafugees and ready to provide help but real problem is occupation which is biggest curse , why US is not giving any time frame for exit ? this is point of real concern , it means they have long term plan to stay in Afghanistan.
Nations have to sacrifice for their sovernity and independence.Read history of independence of Pakistan.Still we are facing lot of challenges , India had never accepted our independence and trying to weaken our national unity by supporting BLA and TTP.
Brother why do you bring India into a discussion where an Afgan national is telling you that Afghanistanis want you Pakistanis to stop interfering in their issues? India does recognise your independence. If India is supporting the BLA and the TTP, which your government is yet to prove, then I wouldn't be surprised as the GoI may just label it "payback time". Doesnt have anything to do with your independence and shaving off some of your ego which makes you believe that India wants to reclaim Pakistan may just help you in the long run. Highly unlikely that they are nonetheless and your accusation remains just a suspicion.