Hasnain2009
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2009
- Messages
- 1,782
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Bharat Rakshak is reliable source!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Source:
Wings That Stay On - The Role of Fighter Aircraft in War
USAF Colonel (Ret) Edward V. "Cougar" Coggins Jr.
Published by Turner Publishing Company, 2000
ISBN 1563115689, 9781563115684
PAF Inventory
- 100 F-86F Sabres
- 25 B-57 Canberras
- 12 F-104A & F-104B Starfighters
- 12 T-33A trainer/fighter/bombers (two sear F-80s)
=199
The Indian Air Force (IAF) was larger than the PAF and had a myriad of equipment:
IAF
- 8 Mig-21 Fishbeds
- 118 Hawker Hunters
- 80 Mystere IV-As
- 50 Gnats
- 56 Ouragans
- 132 Vampires
Thats make 444!!
and dude change your friend circle all of your friends are mujahideen .
you lost me sir . you seem to read only pc's comment .
my father once told me a of a pakistani pilot which came on international media during the war of 65 . he on TV said he downed many indian planes and seemed very proud but after some reasearch it came out that he had not faced even a single indian fighter in air , he just destroyed indian fighters stationed on ground .
you dont believe anything until source is given to you . maybe i could give you . maybe i could give you the source that pakistanis in japan are calling themselves indian .
read this
Indian Air Force - Visiting the MiG-21 Bisons
india did not have even 6 mig-21 at 65 . they became operational after 65 .
and dude change your friend circle all of your friends are mujahideen .
wait.
IAF received its MiG-21F-13 batch in 1963 ..
Indian Air Force Losses -1965 War
and lol.. your own source claims that 3 Mig-21 were lost on the ground.
If you see how well radars are now compared to a decade ago then you would understand that there is a reason why Israeli and others are willing to replace their elephants...
The RCS of MKI is huge. Believe me. I do not have to share the technical details but if you read some on google you will understand. Just read the part I posted about RCS. That is more reliable then someone telling me that it is sleek or nice... If the design was that good then it would never have two vertical tails... No huge brake or those added features around the intake... Hell, those pylons or attached BVR's are even more funny... Just for discussion... How do you judge its RCS?
Ok it is official. You know nothing. I suggest you desist as warnings/banning are imminent. Leave this debate to the smarter members of your nationbelieve me rcs doesnt matter much until you have got f-22 or f-35 . you attach ammunition and fuel tanks - a jf-17 will be identified as early as a mki by ground based radars .
believe me rcs doesnt matter much until you have got f-22 or f-35 . you attach ammunition and fuel tanks - a jf-17 will be identified as early as a mki by ground based radars .
New Recruit
But you just proved you don't know anything because there IS a discussion about it. It has been shown that JF has every chance of taking out the big bad sukhoi from beyond visual range, the sukhoi has no significant advantage at that range when the JF is supported by AEW/C aircraft.There is no discussion. SU-30MKI beats JF-17 fair and square. Hell, the F16 Block 60 will beat the JF-17 anyday.