Ottoman-Turk
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2011
- Messages
- 2,145
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
lol thats true nobody has mongol culture now or they had no civilization
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
New Recruit
-------------------------------------------------------------------------Overall I think the best 2 empires in history have been the Mongols and the British. These 2 managed to grab land more than anyother, and kept it for a good while, while also imposing their language and culture on others. Success I say, lol
New Recruit
Buddy you should know that the roman army was one of the most disciplined.Yea the Indian kings could have troubled them a bit however they would have been victorious cause of better technology with them.Just think if they weren't near Mediterranean but lived near us then??The Roman civilisation was powerful amongst the countries surrounding it. I doubt it could have won against the massive armies fielded by the Indian and Chinese kingdoms.
New Recruit
You see, outsides might think otherwise, but once Islam came, and Punjab and Sindh accepted it, we (I'm Punjabi) no longer though of the Muslim rulers as outsides or foreign people who are imposing their rule on us, they technically became our people or should I say we became theirs
Can you elaborate on how or who accepted mongol civilization?
Such words can be spoken by only those who value their freedom very lightly.When US fought for independence from the English both were Christians.By your analogy if Iran conquers KSA or vice versa would the enslaved people live happily?Freedom and liberty are among the most cherished human traits no matter which religion you belong to!
New Recruit
Apart from surnames I don't think they have left anything.For the Turkish part I think some one from turkey could spread light on that.Turkic cultures, if I'm not mistaken, takes alot from Mongol culture.
Khans. They're everywhere, Pakistan, Afghanistan, India, Bangladesh, West Asian "Stans". Where does this khan title (or surname as it is today) come from?
That's what I'm saying bro, in general the only ones that rebelled against the foreign Muslim invaders were you (no offence) Hindus and Sikhs. Call it wanting freedom or whatever, point is us Muslims didn't feel like our freedom was taken, and as I said, we essentially became one of them.
Don't compare us with the US, also the Saudi Arabians won't be happy because Iran is "Shia".
Moreover why can't I compare with US.Of KSA and Iran I said so because at the end of the day both are Islamic countries.Correct me if I am wrong.
Buddy you should know that the roman army was one of the most disciplined.Yea the Indian kings could have troubled them a bit however they would have been victorious cause of better technology with them.Just think if they weren't near Mediterranean but lived near us then??
Reason you can't compare the Subcontinental Muslims and Muslim Conquerors to USA and Brit. Emp. is because the USA was essentially a colony to the UK whereas the Subcontinent became the home for these "invaders" later on.
For example the, they extracted all resources and invested them within the Subcontinent whereas the Brits extracted American resources and (largely) used them back home in Britain. I know it's not the best example lol, but just to give you an idea
New Recruit
The Indian armies of the Mauryan and Gupta empires were also quite disciplined. And the Romans did held little if any technological advantage over them.
I'd love to see the ancient Roman army deal with several thousand elephants.
It's a little harder to compare the Chinese to the Romans. Technologically, China was nearly always superior to anyone else, but to what extent it was able to put its technology to good practical use is an open question.