navtrek
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2009
- Messages
- 3,169
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
This is a logic trap.
If you bring China-Tibet up as an example of illegality, and draw parallels to the MacMahon line then you are automatically ceding the point because if such claims are illegal by your definition, India would be breaking her own laws by conspicuously taking up Britain claim verbatim.
All beside the point, no future border negotiations between India and China will reference China's reestablishment of central control in Tibet. (I really prefer this term over invasion)
ha ha ok ill accept that even though i know it will be difficult to base my claims by accepting that fact ill still accept the fact.
Ill accept that it was reestablishment of central control (even tough its very biased and tilted heavily towards you). But reality coz India has accepted it to be so.
But still i can prove your claims on Arunachal Pradesh and Aksai Chin wrong and misguided.