Stop random arrests of Muslim men on IS pretext: Muslim organisations

[vayuputhra]

Fan of modi? It's terrorism, sir. :p

Who said that to you? Maulana musharraf, or maulana masoodh azhar, you may feel terrorised by modi but not for us

 

[Moonlight]

Who said that to you? Maulana musharraf, or maulana masoodh azhar, you may feel terrorised by modi but not for us

Yeah why would you feel terrorized? You have accepted the fact by now. :p and when you accept it, things become very easy.

 

[vayuputhra]

Fan of modi? It's terrorism, sir. :p

Who said that to you? Maulana musharraf, or maulana masoodh azhar, you may feel terrorised by modi but not for us

 

[jamahir]

okay, if people like shahrukh khan and myself are arrested for being "sleeper cells of isis" then there is a serious problem... otherwise any tableegh jamaati arrested using any excuse is good.... these tableeghis are nato agents who since 2011 have been going to syria and libya to murder/massacre/behead/lynch/spear/electrocute/etc the people of those two countries.

This is on the expected line and was bound to happen - Hamla on Islam. Thanks to Pesudo Seculars, Bindi Brigade and Presttitues.

can you tell me, ma'am, who is the "bindi brigade"??

It was going on for centuries anyway. Didn't stop in 1947.

ISIS is new to West; we have been dealing with ISIS types for centuries.

Whether it is Hindus or us or the Sikhs, we all know that kind too well.

Plus, with the kind of taglines you keep quoting a holy text from yours, it doesn't really convince others about your peaceful intentions.

on february 8th or 7th i presented you with a extract from a article ( that i had re-posted as thread ) written by a christian lady ( a feminist herself ) on how islami socialistic wedding/marriage procedures brought relief to the condition of the females of the world and india in particular.

you never replied back to me about that thread.

now imagine if the islami prohibition of interest-based economics was considered in 1947 india and used to champion a socialist system... would 300,000+ farmers have suicided in india just between 1995 and 2016?? would india have been declared "suicide capital of the world" in 2014?? would rohith vemula have suicided only a few days ago??

and here you are, championing sangh-defended brahminical capitalist and reactionary rubbish that has caused oppression and injustice in india for 2900 years... and you claim to be a buddhist, why??

reported your post.

i had decided to not indulge in political discussions for some time... i was fatigued of constantly replying to anti-human posts that repeat the same things in a seemingly infinite loop, never to learn... do you especially the indian nationalists have nothing to do in life except jobs, mba/software college degrees kirket, drinking alcohol, war-mongering and hatred of islam and socialism??

 

[Tshering22]

Here is typical fan of Modi.

So what?

What's wrong with a person wearing tilak?

BTW this picture is of a sadhu agitating on a social issue here.

Not abrogating the constitution.

 

[AnnoyingOrange]

Muslim Leaders Salim, Arshad Ashihad, Rasheedi Naved Hamid ,AB Hamid Numani at the press conference in new Delhi on Monday. (Express photo)

Six Muslim organisations have come together to denounce the Islamic State (IS) as “unIslamic” and “terrorist” but have also exhibited concern over what they called a conspiracy to target and arrest educated young Muslim men under the “pretext of IS”.

This, they apprehend, is a ploy to create terror among the community, which will create a problem for the country in the long run. “Arrest of innocent Muslim youths on one hand, and steps for release of the accused in big Hindutva terror cases (on the other), prove that the ruling party is implementing its communal agenda and its slogan of ‘sabka saath sabka vikas’ was a mirage,” the organisations said Monday.


The six groups are Jamaat-e-Islami Hind, Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind, Ahle Hadees, All-India Majlis-e-Mushawarat, Milli Council, and the Welfare Party.


Alleging that there appears to be a motive behind demonising the community, S Q R T Ilyas of All-India Muslim Personal Law Board and Welfare Party said Home Minister Rajnath Singh had said at a counter-terror conference held in March last year that there was no IS in India. “What explains the vacillations since,” he asked. “Has one year suddenly made most educated young (Muslims) suspects?”

The group claimed that in 2014 only 18 of 141 people apprehended were chargesheeted, and the remaining 123 were found innocent.

Most of these people, too, would probably be released by higher courts, they said, alleging that young men from the community are picked up randomly and charged with being either terrorists or sympathisers.

They made seven demands of the NDA government, including “full expose of the Hindutva terror network uncovered by slain (Mumbai Police) ATS chief Hemant Karkare, and cases brought to light by admissions of Swami Aseemanand”. Thy also demanded formation of a panel to work as “watchdog” and look into cases of arrests made on “mere suspicion”.

Stop random arrests of Muslim men on IS pretext: Muslim organisations | The Indian Express

@nair @GURU DUTT @MilSpec @Water Car Engineer @hellfire @third eye @Horus @waz @Khafee @Irfan Baloch

Four Words:

Uttar Pradesh Assembly Elections.....


Rings a bell...anyone?

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

So what?

What's wrong with a person wearing tilak?

BTW this picture is of a sadhu agitating on a social issue here.

Not abrogating the constitution.

Apparently the man was protesting against the Govt for july 5th 2005 Ayodhya attack

Ayodhya Blast

Guess protesting against terrorism is wrong and something that should be mocked in the eyes of some people

2005 Ram Janmabhoomi attack - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Tshering22]

Apparently the man was protesting against the Govt for july 5th 2005 Ayodhya attack

Ayodhya Blast

Guess protesting against terrorism is wrong in the eyes of some people

2005 Ram Janmabhoomi attack - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

That's why I said, protesting against a social issue (terrorism is anti-social remember?).

Media is in cohorts with terrorists. And you Hindus are their favourite boxing bag.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

That's why I said, protesting against a social issue (terrorism is anti-social remember?).

Media is in cohorts with terrorists. And you Hindus are their favourite boxing bag.

Interesting that pic has mostly been found, in missionaries and Islamist wordpress site claiming Hindu atrocities against Muslims or Christians.

https://www.google.co.in/search?biw...H4fJblh&ei=dfu6VoUPjYi4BIzmpcAK&start=60&sa=N

 

[Tshering22]

The day the local pandit forces me to come to a mandir every Tuesday or any other day, the Hindu belief system will reach that stage wherein your doomsday prophecy will hold true. We are still at least a century from that point. I will really have to scratch my head if you would ask me the last time I had been to a mandir or a masjid!

Unlikely sir.

The Hindu, Buddhist, Sikh and Jain faiths are not organized religions. That is what separates our system in India (and all non-Indians practising them around the world) from the organized religions of middle east.

 

[mpk1988]

This was bound to happen after the Hindutva govt is cracking down on Muslims while using an assumed ISIS threat, never miss a chance do ya.

Why did you bomb and hang a lot of accused in the name 'Zarb-eAzb'? Never miss a chance to stomp on the Pashtun and Baloch do ya??

 

[jamahir]

BTW this picture is of a sadhu agitating on a social issue here.

social issue - you mean "honor killing", dog attacks, "india the suicide capital" etc??

Not abrogating the constitution.

the indian constitution guarantees the citizen the right to form employee unions... now most of the employees in the indian software/services industry support bjp and the sangh and always talk about constitution ( like you just did ), yet these employees have not formed a single employee union since the industry began in a big way 1995 onwards... a contradiction.

Unlikely sir.

The Hindu, Buddhist, Sikh and Jain faiths are not organized religions. That is what separates our system in India (and all non-Indians practising them around the world) from the organized religions of middle east.

islam is not a religion for the sake of constant worship of divinity through countless rituals and festivals done throughout the year... among all the older religions islam is the closest to atheism/agnosticism - look at the shahada ( declaration of faith ) itself - "there is no other god but god and muhammad is his messenger"... do you not see the simplicity in this?? further, as i have told you a few times already, socialism is inherent to true islam and true islam came about to simplify life and bring justice and due human rights.

and how is hinduism not a organized religion??

what do you say, @Mentee ??

 

[Jaanbaz]

What's wrong with a person wearing tilak?

Terrorist.

 

[Mentee]

social issue - you mean "honor killing", dog attacks, "india the suicide capital" etc??



the indian constitution guarantees the citizen the right to form employee unions... now most of the employees in the indian software/services industry support bjp and the sangh and always talk about constitution ( like you just did ), yet these employees have not formed a single employee union since the industry began in a big way 1995 onwards... a contradiction.



islam is not a religion for the sake of constant worship of divinity through countless rituals and festivals done throughout the year... among all the older religions islam is the closest to atheism/agnosticism - look at the shahada ( declaration of faith ) itself - "there is no other god but god and muhammad is his messenger"... do you not see the simplicity in this?? further, as i have told you a few times already, socialism is inherent to true islam and true islam came about to simplify life and bring justice and due human rights.

and how is hinduism not a organized religion??

what do you say, @Mentee ??

lets just assume that Islam is not in accordance with the modern cultural and social values. it endorses savage practices towards woman kind e.g law of inheritance , polygami---------and now try to raise the veil of 7th century A.D. can anyone even imagine in his/her noblest dreams that a woman 1400 years back can inherit propert or any other valuable thing in her own name, or could she have the authority to just go to a judge to get her self divorced just because she does not like her husband's facial features,

Islam is not just a religion rather a socio economic system which gives you policy guide lines. which does not just rely upon good rehtoric, instead shows its pupil how to get your self to the end result. the first religion which gave the concept of social security even to its non muslim citizens by establishing baitul mal( an Islamic treasury)

declaring usury (mother of all financial evils), gambling, prostitution, drinking--------- absoultely illegal.

folks use to taunt the word Dhimmi infact its a blessing for non muslim citizens----- that they wont have to empty their pockets to the extent, as a Musalman shall have to do . dhimmis only pay some specified taxes depending on their social status like, jizya (having a lot of exceptions)---- even that is negotiable and can enjoy almost every same facility which a musalman enjoys while Zakat and usher is mandatory upon musalmans and lot of other other taxes which the government can impose if it deems fit.

polygami is allowed--- but in certain times, like war, drought e.t.c. to help widows or those ladies which could not get themselves married due to social constraints, so they would get respect, social security---- it does not give someone a liscence to have as many brides as he pleases.
Even Quran implies that you wont be able to do justice with as many wives-----

coming to hinduism, its not a religion , a cultural phenomenon though, synonymous to vedic religion butt it isn't a religion, tries to assimilate every other religion which comes into a contact with it. even cultural norms of natives and of foreigners and presents you a modified thing.
like dowry ( started by rajpoot princes ) and satti are some of cultural curses , no where it is written in vedas that you wont go to swarg if you shall not bring dowry with you. but we can see these things in practice in the name of hinduism

sir i hope these lines may satisfy you. , iam still a 20 years old and honestly penned, what i have experienced.might have done some blunders in this post